Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems

Abstract Background Whilst traditional strategies to increase transfection efficiency of non-viral systems aimed at modifying the vector or the polyplexes/lipoplexes, biomaterial-mediated gene delivery has recently sparked increased interest. This review aims at discussing biomaterial properties and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Valeria Graceffa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00194-3
_version_ 1797205246475239424
author Valeria Graceffa
author_facet Valeria Graceffa
author_sort Valeria Graceffa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Whilst traditional strategies to increase transfection efficiency of non-viral systems aimed at modifying the vector or the polyplexes/lipoplexes, biomaterial-mediated gene delivery has recently sparked increased interest. This review aims at discussing biomaterial properties and unravelling underlying mechanisms of action, for biomaterial-mediated gene delivery. DNA internalisation and cytoplasmic transport are initially discussed. DNA immobilisation, encapsulation and surface-mediated gene delivery (SMD), the role of extracellular matrix (ECM) and topographical cues, biomaterial stiffness and mechanical stimulation are finally outlined. Main text Endocytic pathways and mechanisms to escape the lysosomal network are highly variable. They depend on cell and DNA complex types but can be diverted using appropriate biomaterials. 3D scaffolds are generally fabricated via DNA immobilisation or encapsulation. Degradation rate and interaction with the vector affect temporal patterns of DNA release and transgene expression. In SMD, DNA is instead coated on 2D surfaces. SMD allows the incorporation of topographical cues, which, by inducing cytoskeletal re-arrangements, modulate DNA endocytosis. Incorporation of ECM mimetics allows cell type-specific transfection, whereas in spite of discordances in terms of optimal loading regimens, it is recognised that mechanical loading facilitates gene transfection. Finally, stiffer 2D substrates enhance DNA internalisation, whereas in 3D scaffolds, the role of stiffness is still dubious. Conclusion Although it is recognised that biomaterials allow the creation of tailored non-viral gene delivery systems, there still are many outstanding questions. A better characterisation of endocytic pathways would allow the diversion of cell adhesion processes and cytoskeletal dynamics, in order to increase cellular transfection. Further research on optimal biomaterial mechanical properties, cell ligand density and loading regimens is limited by the fact that such parameters influence a plethora of other different processes (e.g. cellular adhesion, spreading, migration, infiltration, and proliferation, DNA diffusion and release) which may in turn modulate gene delivery. Only a better understanding of these processes may allow the creation of novel robust engineered systems, potentially opening up a whole new area of biomaterial-guided gene delivery for non-viral systems.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:48:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9726e6e45fa4e449e9328d77a07490b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-5920
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:48:04Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-c9726e6e45fa4e449e9328d77a07490b2024-04-16T13:12:29ZengElsevierJournal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology2090-59202021-06-0119112110.1186/s43141-021-00194-3Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systemsValeria Graceffa0Cellular Health and Toxicology Research Group (CHAT), Institute of Technology SligoAbstract Background Whilst traditional strategies to increase transfection efficiency of non-viral systems aimed at modifying the vector or the polyplexes/lipoplexes, biomaterial-mediated gene delivery has recently sparked increased interest. This review aims at discussing biomaterial properties and unravelling underlying mechanisms of action, for biomaterial-mediated gene delivery. DNA internalisation and cytoplasmic transport are initially discussed. DNA immobilisation, encapsulation and surface-mediated gene delivery (SMD), the role of extracellular matrix (ECM) and topographical cues, biomaterial stiffness and mechanical stimulation are finally outlined. Main text Endocytic pathways and mechanisms to escape the lysosomal network are highly variable. They depend on cell and DNA complex types but can be diverted using appropriate biomaterials. 3D scaffolds are generally fabricated via DNA immobilisation or encapsulation. Degradation rate and interaction with the vector affect temporal patterns of DNA release and transgene expression. In SMD, DNA is instead coated on 2D surfaces. SMD allows the incorporation of topographical cues, which, by inducing cytoskeletal re-arrangements, modulate DNA endocytosis. Incorporation of ECM mimetics allows cell type-specific transfection, whereas in spite of discordances in terms of optimal loading regimens, it is recognised that mechanical loading facilitates gene transfection. Finally, stiffer 2D substrates enhance DNA internalisation, whereas in 3D scaffolds, the role of stiffness is still dubious. Conclusion Although it is recognised that biomaterials allow the creation of tailored non-viral gene delivery systems, there still are many outstanding questions. A better characterisation of endocytic pathways would allow the diversion of cell adhesion processes and cytoskeletal dynamics, in order to increase cellular transfection. Further research on optimal biomaterial mechanical properties, cell ligand density and loading regimens is limited by the fact that such parameters influence a plethora of other different processes (e.g. cellular adhesion, spreading, migration, infiltration, and proliferation, DNA diffusion and release) which may in turn modulate gene delivery. Only a better understanding of these processes may allow the creation of novel robust engineered systems, potentially opening up a whole new area of biomaterial-guided gene delivery for non-viral systems.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00194-3Biomaterial-mediated gene deliverySurface-mediated gene deliveryNon-viral gene delivery systemsMechanical cuesExtracellular matrix cuesTopographic cues
spellingShingle Valeria Graceffa
Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Biomaterial-mediated gene delivery
Surface-mediated gene delivery
Non-viral gene delivery systems
Mechanical cues
Extracellular matrix cues
Topographic cues
title Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems
title_full Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems
title_fullStr Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems
title_full_unstemmed Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems
title_short Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems
title_sort physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial mediated plasmid dna delivery insights into non viral delivery systems
topic Biomaterial-mediated gene delivery
Surface-mediated gene delivery
Non-viral gene delivery systems
Mechanical cues
Extracellular matrix cues
Topographic cues
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00194-3
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriagraceffa physicalandmechanicalcuesaffectingbiomaterialmediatedplasmiddnadeliveryinsightsintononviraldeliverysystems