Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein
Dennis Patterson, modern American legal theorist, is one of the active supporters of the importance and significance of later Wittgenstein’s ideas for resolving legal philosophy problems, including legal indeterminacy problem. On the basis of Wittgenstein’s ideas about rule-following and acting i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2021/%D0%A2.%206,%20%E2%84%96%202%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/99-106%20%D0%9E%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%20%D0%92..pdf |
_version_ | 1818934025168879616 |
---|---|
author | V. V. Ogleznev |
author_facet | V. V. Ogleznev |
author_sort | V. V. Ogleznev |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Dennis Patterson, modern American legal theorist, is one of the active supporters
of the importance and significance of later Wittgenstein’s ideas for resolving legal
philosophy problems, including legal indeterminacy problem. On the basis of
Wittgenstein’s ideas about rule-following and acting in accordance with rule, he
developed his own special approach to law and legal interpretation. Although
there are some doubts and possible objections that he understood and interpreted
«Philosophical Investigations» correctly, it should be recognized that Patterson made
a full-scale (and sometimes very convincing) attempt to explicate Wittgenstein’s
thoughts in a quite different context, namely, in the context of legal theory. His
treatment of wittgensteinian philosophy of language continues to be interesting
and sound, despite the criticisms that have been made against his approach. It is in
fact very hard to find among modern legal philosophers or theorists someone who
could interpret Wittgenstein in a more sophisticated way than Patterson has done |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T04:57:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c97f6461f83541339ee9e36933018fd7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T04:57:43Z |
publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
publisher | Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education |
record_format | Article |
series | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
spelling | doaj.art-c97f6461f83541339ee9e36933018fd72022-12-21T19:52:41ZengOmsk State Technical University, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher EducationОмский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"2542-04882541-79832021-05-01629910610.25206/2542-0488-2021-6-2-99-106Dennis Patterson on WittgensteinV. V. Ogleznev0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-6543Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesDennis Patterson, modern American legal theorist, is one of the active supporters of the importance and significance of later Wittgenstein’s ideas for resolving legal philosophy problems, including legal indeterminacy problem. On the basis of Wittgenstein’s ideas about rule-following and acting in accordance with rule, he developed his own special approach to law and legal interpretation. Although there are some doubts and possible objections that he understood and interpreted «Philosophical Investigations» correctly, it should be recognized that Patterson made a full-scale (and sometimes very convincing) attempt to explicate Wittgenstein’s thoughts in a quite different context, namely, in the context of legal theory. His treatment of wittgensteinian philosophy of language continues to be interesting and sound, despite the criticisms that have been made against his approach. It is in fact very hard to find among modern legal philosophers or theorists someone who could interpret Wittgenstein in a more sophisticated way than Patterson has donehttps://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2021/%D0%A2.%206,%20%E2%84%96%202%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/99-106%20%D0%9E%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%20%D0%92..pdfrule-followinglegal indeterminacyinterpretationunderstandinglegal rulewittgensteinpatterson |
spellingShingle | V. V. Ogleznev Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" rule-following legal indeterminacy interpretation understanding legal rule wittgenstein patterson |
title | Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein |
title_full | Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein |
title_fullStr | Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein |
title_full_unstemmed | Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein |
title_short | Dennis Patterson on Wittgenstein |
title_sort | dennis patterson on wittgenstein |
topic | rule-following legal indeterminacy interpretation understanding legal rule wittgenstein patterson |
url | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2021/%D0%A2.%206,%20%E2%84%96%202%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/99-106%20%D0%9E%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%20%D0%92..pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vvogleznev dennispattersononwittgenstein |