Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective
The vast volume of documents available in legal databases demands effective information retrieval approaches which take into consideration the intricacies of the legal domain. Relevant document retrieval is the backbone of the legal domain. The concept of relevance in the legal domain is very comple...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020-03-01
|
Series: | PeerJ Computer Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/cs-262.pdf |
_version_ | 1818601657461637120 |
---|---|
author | Rupali S. Wagh Deepa Anand |
author_facet | Rupali S. Wagh Deepa Anand |
author_sort | Rupali S. Wagh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The vast volume of documents available in legal databases demands effective information retrieval approaches which take into consideration the intricacies of the legal domain. Relevant document retrieval is the backbone of the legal domain. The concept of relevance in the legal domain is very complex and multi-faceted. In this work, we propose a novel approach of concept based similarity estimation among court judgments. We use a graph-based method, to identify prominent concepts present in a judgment and extract sentences representative of these concepts. The sentences and concepts so mined are used to express/visualize likeness among concepts between a pair of documents from different perspectives. We also propose to aggregate the different levels of matching so obtained into one measure quantifying the level of similarity between a judgment pair. We employ the ordered weighted average (OWA) family of aggregation operators for obtaining the similarity value. The experimental results suggest that the proposed approach of concept based similarity is effective in the extraction of relevant legal documents and performs better than other competing techniques. Additionally, the proposed two-level abstraction of similarity enables informative visualization for deeper insights into case relevance. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T12:54:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c9974d5c3b8e4677b136de0bd0f984d3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2376-5992 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T12:54:52Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | Article |
series | PeerJ Computer Science |
spelling | doaj.art-c9974d5c3b8e4677b136de0bd0f984d32022-12-21T22:31:03ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ Computer Science2376-59922020-03-016e26210.7717/peerj-cs.262Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspectiveRupali S. Wagh0Deepa Anand1Department of Computer Science, JAIN Deemed to be University, Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Information Science and Engineering, CMR Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaThe vast volume of documents available in legal databases demands effective information retrieval approaches which take into consideration the intricacies of the legal domain. Relevant document retrieval is the backbone of the legal domain. The concept of relevance in the legal domain is very complex and multi-faceted. In this work, we propose a novel approach of concept based similarity estimation among court judgments. We use a graph-based method, to identify prominent concepts present in a judgment and extract sentences representative of these concepts. The sentences and concepts so mined are used to express/visualize likeness among concepts between a pair of documents from different perspectives. We also propose to aggregate the different levels of matching so obtained into one measure quantifying the level of similarity between a judgment pair. We employ the ordered weighted average (OWA) family of aggregation operators for obtaining the similarity value. The experimental results suggest that the proposed approach of concept based similarity is effective in the extraction of relevant legal documents and performs better than other competing techniques. Additionally, the proposed two-level abstraction of similarity enables informative visualization for deeper insights into case relevance.https://peerj.com/articles/cs-262.pdfLegal Information RetrievalConcept Based SimilarityMulti-Dimensional SimilarityOWAConcept interaction graph |
spellingShingle | Rupali S. Wagh Deepa Anand Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective PeerJ Computer Science Legal Information Retrieval Concept Based Similarity Multi-Dimensional Similarity OWA Concept interaction graph |
title | Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective |
title_full | Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective |
title_fullStr | Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective |
title_short | Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective |
title_sort | legal document similarity a multi criteria decision making perspective |
topic | Legal Information Retrieval Concept Based Similarity Multi-Dimensional Similarity OWA Concept interaction graph |
url | https://peerj.com/articles/cs-262.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rupaliswagh legaldocumentsimilarityamulticriteriadecisionmakingperspective AT deepaanand legaldocumentsimilarityamulticriteriadecisionmakingperspective |