The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age

Plant biomass is still the main raw material in the production of energy from renewable sources. Virginia fanpetals may be an alternative and complementary source of solid biomass to that obtained from forests and the wood industry. In this respect, it is important to assess the variability of the q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacek Kwiatkowski, Łukasz Graban, Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/218
_version_ 1797358894726512640
author Jacek Kwiatkowski
Łukasz Graban
Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski
author_facet Jacek Kwiatkowski
Łukasz Graban
Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski
author_sort Jacek Kwiatkowski
collection DOAJ
description Plant biomass is still the main raw material in the production of energy from renewable sources. Virginia fanpetals may be an alternative and complementary source of solid biomass to that obtained from forests and the wood industry. In this respect, it is important to assess the variability of the qualitative characteristics of Sida biomass as a solid biofuel over a long period of use of a plantation of this species. Three types of propagating material were used to establish the plantation: seeds, root cuttings (rhizomes), and seedlings, at two sowing/planting densities. The quality of the biomass, obtained during 14 consecutive years of harvest, was tested, including the moisture content, ash content, higher heating value (HHV), lower heating value (LHV), and the carbon, hydrogen, sulfur, and nitrogen content. It was found that both thermophysical properties and elemental composition were mostly determined by the years of vegetation. An important role in this respect was played by the juvenile period of the plants’ development. The biomass obtained after 1 year of vegetation contained a larger concentration of ash, nitrogen, and sulfur and less carbon and hydrogen, which reduced its energy value. The results confirm the possibility of obtaining biomass with low moisture, which favorably places it from an energy point of view.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:07:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9a2e56a3477430486c62fcfb34ea449
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:07:49Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-c9a2e56a3477430486c62fcfb34ea4492024-01-10T14:56:16ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-12-0117121810.3390/en17010218The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation AgeJacek Kwiatkowski0Łukasz Graban1Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski2Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, PolandDepartment of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, PolandDepartment of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-724 Olsztyn, PolandPlant biomass is still the main raw material in the production of energy from renewable sources. Virginia fanpetals may be an alternative and complementary source of solid biomass to that obtained from forests and the wood industry. In this respect, it is important to assess the variability of the qualitative characteristics of Sida biomass as a solid biofuel over a long period of use of a plantation of this species. Three types of propagating material were used to establish the plantation: seeds, root cuttings (rhizomes), and seedlings, at two sowing/planting densities. The quality of the biomass, obtained during 14 consecutive years of harvest, was tested, including the moisture content, ash content, higher heating value (HHV), lower heating value (LHV), and the carbon, hydrogen, sulfur, and nitrogen content. It was found that both thermophysical properties and elemental composition were mostly determined by the years of vegetation. An important role in this respect was played by the juvenile period of the plants’ development. The biomass obtained after 1 year of vegetation contained a larger concentration of ash, nitrogen, and sulfur and less carbon and hydrogen, which reduced its energy value. The results confirm the possibility of obtaining biomass with low moisture, which favorably places it from an energy point of view.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/218Virginia fanpetals<i>Sida hermaphrodita</i>herbaceous cropslignocellulosic biomassash contentsulfur content
spellingShingle Jacek Kwiatkowski
Łukasz Graban
Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski
The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age
Energies
Virginia fanpetals
<i>Sida hermaphrodita</i>
herbaceous crops
lignocellulosic biomass
ash content
sulfur content
title The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age
title_full The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age
title_fullStr The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age
title_full_unstemmed The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age
title_short The Quality of Virginia Fanpetals Biomass as an Energy Source, Depending on the Type of Propagating Material and Plantation Age
title_sort quality of virginia fanpetals biomass as an energy source depending on the type of propagating material and plantation age
topic Virginia fanpetals
<i>Sida hermaphrodita</i>
herbaceous crops
lignocellulosic biomass
ash content
sulfur content
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/218
work_keys_str_mv AT jacekkwiatkowski thequalityofvirginiafanpetalsbiomassasanenergysourcedependingonthetypeofpropagatingmaterialandplantationage
AT łukaszgraban thequalityofvirginiafanpetalsbiomassasanenergysourcedependingonthetypeofpropagatingmaterialandplantationage
AT mariuszjerzystolarski thequalityofvirginiafanpetalsbiomassasanenergysourcedependingonthetypeofpropagatingmaterialandplantationage
AT jacekkwiatkowski qualityofvirginiafanpetalsbiomassasanenergysourcedependingonthetypeofpropagatingmaterialandplantationage
AT łukaszgraban qualityofvirginiafanpetalsbiomassasanenergysourcedependingonthetypeofpropagatingmaterialandplantationage
AT mariuszjerzystolarski qualityofvirginiafanpetalsbiomassasanenergysourcedependingonthetypeofpropagatingmaterialandplantationage