Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain

Background: The degree of tooth enamel wear is an important aspect of the clinical acceptability of all-ceramic restorations. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of enamel wear by feldspathic porcelain and polymer-infiltrated ceramic. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 10...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani, Mohammad Azizian, Ali Rohani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2019;volume=16;issue=2;spage=71;epage=75;aulast=Ashtiani
_version_ 1818501795536699392
author Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani
Mohammad Azizian
Ali Rohani
author_facet Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani
Mohammad Azizian
Ali Rohani
author_sort Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani
collection DOAJ
description Background: The degree of tooth enamel wear is an important aspect of the clinical acceptability of all-ceramic restorations. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of enamel wear by feldspathic porcelain and polymer-infiltrated ceramic. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 10 polymer-infiltrated ceramics were prepared by creating the sections of Vita Enamic® blocks (18 mm × 14 mm × 4 mm). A total of 10 porcelain cylinders were built, and feldspathic porcelain (VMK 95, Vita) was used and fired over the metal discs. A total of 20 human maxillary premolars were assigned as antagonist. Then, 10 teeth were arranged and placed oppose to porcelain samples and 10 others were placed oppose to polymer-infiltrated-ceramic specimens in the chewing simulator. The samples were photographed before and after the chewing simulation. The difference between the two photograph was measured by stereomicroscope and Motic Image plus software 2.0 three times, and then, the mean of these three times was recorded as the amount of wear. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and SPSS version 16. The level of significancy was 0.05. Results: The mean wear rate teeth oppose to the feldspathic porcelain group (377.294 μ) was significantly higher than that of the polymer-infiltrated ceramic group (101.755 μ) (P = 0.002). Conclusion: In the present study, the amount of enamel wear of the natural teeth opposed to polymer-infiltrated ceramic was significantly lower than feldspathic porcelain.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:01:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9accff18b8546bf9d27e3cce9172488
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:01:08Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Dental Research Journal
spelling doaj.art-c9accff18b8546bf9d27e3cce91724882022-12-22T01:33:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552019-01-01162717510.4103/1735-3327.250972Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelainAlireza Hashemi AshtianiMohammad AzizianAli RohaniBackground: The degree of tooth enamel wear is an important aspect of the clinical acceptability of all-ceramic restorations. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of enamel wear by feldspathic porcelain and polymer-infiltrated ceramic. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 10 polymer-infiltrated ceramics were prepared by creating the sections of Vita Enamic® blocks (18 mm × 14 mm × 4 mm). A total of 10 porcelain cylinders were built, and feldspathic porcelain (VMK 95, Vita) was used and fired over the metal discs. A total of 20 human maxillary premolars were assigned as antagonist. Then, 10 teeth were arranged and placed oppose to porcelain samples and 10 others were placed oppose to polymer-infiltrated-ceramic specimens in the chewing simulator. The samples were photographed before and after the chewing simulation. The difference between the two photograph was measured by stereomicroscope and Motic Image plus software 2.0 three times, and then, the mean of these three times was recorded as the amount of wear. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and SPSS version 16. The level of significancy was 0.05. Results: The mean wear rate teeth oppose to the feldspathic porcelain group (377.294 μ) was significantly higher than that of the polymer-infiltrated ceramic group (101.755 μ) (P = 0.002). Conclusion: In the present study, the amount of enamel wear of the natural teeth opposed to polymer-infiltrated ceramic was significantly lower than feldspathic porcelain.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2019;volume=16;issue=2;spage=71;epage=75;aulast=AshtianiEnamel wearfeldspathic porcelainpolymer-infiltrated ceramic
spellingShingle Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani
Mohammad Azizian
Ali Rohani
Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
Dental Research Journal
Enamel wear
feldspathic porcelain
polymer-infiltrated ceramic
title Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
title_full Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
title_fullStr Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
title_full_unstemmed Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
title_short Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
title_sort comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to polymer infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain
topic Enamel wear
feldspathic porcelain
polymer-infiltrated ceramic
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2019;volume=16;issue=2;spage=71;epage=75;aulast=Ashtiani
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezahashemiashtiani comparisonthedegreeofenamelwearbehavioropposedtopolymerinfiltratedceramicandfeldspathicporcelain
AT mohammadazizian comparisonthedegreeofenamelwearbehavioropposedtopolymerinfiltratedceramicandfeldspathicporcelain
AT alirohani comparisonthedegreeofenamelwearbehavioropposedtopolymerinfiltratedceramicandfeldspathicporcelain