The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system

Abstract Background Climate mitigation is a major consideration when choosing bioenergy systems. Anaerobic digestion of biomass is a bioenergy system, which is normally used for the treatment of manure or other residues, but cultivated energy crops may also provide a potential feedstock. One of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vita Tilvikiene, Kestutis Venslauskas, Virmantas Povilaitis, Kestutis Navickas, Vidmantas Zuperka, Zydre Kadziuliene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:Energy, Sustainability and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-020-00245-6
_version_ 1828849304992743424
author Vita Tilvikiene
Kestutis Venslauskas
Virmantas Povilaitis
Kestutis Navickas
Vidmantas Zuperka
Zydre Kadziuliene
author_facet Vita Tilvikiene
Kestutis Venslauskas
Virmantas Povilaitis
Kestutis Navickas
Vidmantas Zuperka
Zydre Kadziuliene
author_sort Vita Tilvikiene
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Climate mitigation is a major consideration when choosing bioenergy systems. Anaerobic digestion of biomass is a bioenergy system, which is normally used for the treatment of manure or other residues, but cultivated energy crops may also provide a potential feedstock. One of the main crops for biogas production is still maize, but it may be desirable to replace it by perennial grasses, which also have high yields, but do not require as much management. The aim of this study was to analyse greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a biogas production system based on a perennial grass, cocksfoot, grown under different fertiliser application systems. Methods Field and laboratory experiments were carried out over a 7-year period to evaluate the influence of mineral nitrogen and digestate fertiliser application on cocksfoot biomass and biogas productivity. The obtained data were used to calculate GHG emissions and emission savings for the whole biogas production cycle, by use of the SimaPro v.8 software with the IMPACT 2002+ model, based on the climate change environmental impact category. Results Productivity of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) was influenced by the annual rate of nitrogen applied as fertiliser, the fertiliser type and year, as influenced by the weather conditions. The biomass yield of cocksfoot fertilised with 180 kg nitrogen ha−1 year−1 was similar regardless if the nitrogen was applied as digestate or mineral fertiliser. At higher rates of nitrogen application (360–450 kg ha−1 year−1), higher yields and lower net GHG emissions could be obtained from the biogas production cycle when the nitrogen was applied as digestate compared to mineral fertiliser, especially in dry years. Energy input over the whole cycle was mainly influenced by the type of fertiliser and the biomass yield. Mineral fertiliser generally caused higher levels of GHG emissions than organic digestate fertiliser, when the same amount of energy is produced. Conclusions The cocksfoot grass-based biogas production system showed that a significant GHG emission saving potential exists, if nitrogen is added as digestate instead of mineral fertiliser, for similar yields of biomass and energy from biogas. Cocksfoot grass fertilised with digestate is thus a promising feedstock for biogas production.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:49:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9b605be7d3c46799a5e41ae45764d1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2192-0567
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:49:19Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Energy, Sustainability and Society
spelling doaj.art-c9b605be7d3c46799a5e41ae45764d1f2022-12-22T00:09:07ZengBMCEnergy, Sustainability and Society2192-05672020-02-0110111510.1186/s13705-020-00245-6The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production systemVita Tilvikiene0Kestutis Venslauskas1Virmantas Povilaitis2Kestutis Navickas3Vidmantas Zuperka4Zydre Kadziuliene5Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Instituto al. 1Vytautas Magnus UniversityLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Instituto al. 1Vytautas Magnus UniversityVytautas Magnus UniversityLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Instituto al. 1Abstract Background Climate mitigation is a major consideration when choosing bioenergy systems. Anaerobic digestion of biomass is a bioenergy system, which is normally used for the treatment of manure or other residues, but cultivated energy crops may also provide a potential feedstock. One of the main crops for biogas production is still maize, but it may be desirable to replace it by perennial grasses, which also have high yields, but do not require as much management. The aim of this study was to analyse greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a biogas production system based on a perennial grass, cocksfoot, grown under different fertiliser application systems. Methods Field and laboratory experiments were carried out over a 7-year period to evaluate the influence of mineral nitrogen and digestate fertiliser application on cocksfoot biomass and biogas productivity. The obtained data were used to calculate GHG emissions and emission savings for the whole biogas production cycle, by use of the SimaPro v.8 software with the IMPACT 2002+ model, based on the climate change environmental impact category. Results Productivity of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) was influenced by the annual rate of nitrogen applied as fertiliser, the fertiliser type and year, as influenced by the weather conditions. The biomass yield of cocksfoot fertilised with 180 kg nitrogen ha−1 year−1 was similar regardless if the nitrogen was applied as digestate or mineral fertiliser. At higher rates of nitrogen application (360–450 kg ha−1 year−1), higher yields and lower net GHG emissions could be obtained from the biogas production cycle when the nitrogen was applied as digestate compared to mineral fertiliser, especially in dry years. Energy input over the whole cycle was mainly influenced by the type of fertiliser and the biomass yield. Mineral fertiliser generally caused higher levels of GHG emissions than organic digestate fertiliser, when the same amount of energy is produced. Conclusions The cocksfoot grass-based biogas production system showed that a significant GHG emission saving potential exists, if nitrogen is added as digestate instead of mineral fertiliser, for similar yields of biomass and energy from biogas. Cocksfoot grass fertilised with digestate is thus a promising feedstock for biogas production.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-020-00245-6BiogasEnergy cropsProductivityEnergy potentialGHG emission savings
spellingShingle Vita Tilvikiene
Kestutis Venslauskas
Virmantas Povilaitis
Kestutis Navickas
Vidmantas Zuperka
Zydre Kadziuliene
The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Biogas
Energy crops
Productivity
Energy potential
GHG emission savings
title The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system
title_full The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system
title_fullStr The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system
title_full_unstemmed The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system
title_short The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system
title_sort effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot based biogas production system
topic Biogas
Energy crops
Productivity
Energy potential
GHG emission savings
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-020-00245-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vitatilvikiene theeffectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT kestutisvenslauskas theeffectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT virmantaspovilaitis theeffectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT kestutisnavickas theeffectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT vidmantaszuperka theeffectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT zydrekadziuliene theeffectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT vitatilvikiene effectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT kestutisvenslauskas effectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT virmantaspovilaitis effectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT kestutisnavickas effectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT vidmantaszuperka effectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem
AT zydrekadziuliene effectofdigestateandmineralfertilisationofcocksfootgrassongreenhousegasemissionsinacocksfootbasedbiogasproductionsystem