Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?

ntroduction: Prevalence of aortic valve disease increases with a population’s aging. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in cardiac surgery centres. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is believed by some authors to be a significant clinical problem. The a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sławomir Jander, Mirosław Bitner, Bogdan Jegier, Stanisław Ostrowski, Ryszard Jaszewski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2007-03-01
Series:Archives of Medical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.termedia.pl/magazine.php?magazine_id=19&article_id=7865&magazine_subpage=FULL_TEXT
_version_ 1818695357355261952
author Sławomir Jander
Mirosław Bitner
Bogdan Jegier
Stanisław Ostrowski
Ryszard Jaszewski
author_facet Sławomir Jander
Mirosław Bitner
Bogdan Jegier
Stanisław Ostrowski
Ryszard Jaszewski
author_sort Sławomir Jander
collection DOAJ
description ntroduction: Prevalence of aortic valve disease increases with a population’s aging. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in cardiac surgery centres. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is believed by some authors to be a significant clinical problem. The aim of the present study was to assess early results of AVR in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis, with special regard to haemodynamic parameters and PPM. Material and methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients (28 men and 20 women) aged mean 59.3±12.1 years, who underwent AVR with a mechanical prosthesis, in the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Poland in 2003, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The in-hospital postoperative mortality in the study group was 4.2%. The most common postoperative complications were arrhythmia and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), which occurred in 5 patients (10.4%) each. At discharge from hospital no patient met the criterion of PPM (effective orifice area index – EOAI of 0.85 cm2/m2 or lower). Significant improvement was observed in mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and mean maximal valvular gradient (respectively 2.3±0.5 vs. 1.4±0.7 and 87.1±19.1mmHg vs. 26.4±6.5 mmHg, p<0.05 for both values). Conclusions: In the analyzed group the early results of AVR with mechanical prosthesis are good and no case of PPM was observed.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T13:44:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9c37bc4751c40a3baa0c5e95c5ae835
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1734-1922
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T13:44:11Z
publishDate 2007-03-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Archives of Medical Science
spelling doaj.art-c9c37bc4751c40a3baa0c5e95c5ae8352022-12-21T21:46:13ZengTermedia Publishing HouseArchives of Medical Science1734-19222007-03-01315760Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?Sławomir JanderMirosław BitnerBogdan JegierStanisław OstrowskiRyszard Jaszewskintroduction: Prevalence of aortic valve disease increases with a population’s aging. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in cardiac surgery centres. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is believed by some authors to be a significant clinical problem. The aim of the present study was to assess early results of AVR in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis, with special regard to haemodynamic parameters and PPM. Material and methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients (28 men and 20 women) aged mean 59.3±12.1 years, who underwent AVR with a mechanical prosthesis, in the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Poland in 2003, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The in-hospital postoperative mortality in the study group was 4.2%. The most common postoperative complications were arrhythmia and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), which occurred in 5 patients (10.4%) each. At discharge from hospital no patient met the criterion of PPM (effective orifice area index – EOAI of 0.85 cm2/m2 or lower). Significant improvement was observed in mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and mean maximal valvular gradient (respectively 2.3±0.5 vs. 1.4±0.7 and 87.1±19.1mmHg vs. 26.4±6.5 mmHg, p<0.05 for both values). Conclusions: In the analyzed group the early results of AVR with mechanical prosthesis are good and no case of PPM was observed.http://www.termedia.pl/magazine.php?magazine_id=19&article_id=7865&magazine_subpage=FULL_TEXTaortic valve replacementpatient-prosthesis mismatch
spellingShingle Sławomir Jander
Mirosław Bitner
Bogdan Jegier
Stanisław Ostrowski
Ryszard Jaszewski
Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
Archives of Medical Science
aortic valve replacement
patient-prosthesis mismatch
title Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
title_full Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
title_fullStr Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
title_full_unstemmed Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
title_short Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
title_sort early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis is patient prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem
topic aortic valve replacement
patient-prosthesis mismatch
url http://www.termedia.pl/magazine.php?magazine_id=19&article_id=7865&magazine_subpage=FULL_TEXT
work_keys_str_mv AT sławomirjander earlyoutcomeofaorticvalvereplacementwithmechanicalprosthesisinpatientswithaorticstenosisispatientprosthesismismatchasignificantclinicalproblem
AT mirosławbitner earlyoutcomeofaorticvalvereplacementwithmechanicalprosthesisinpatientswithaorticstenosisispatientprosthesismismatchasignificantclinicalproblem
AT bogdanjegier earlyoutcomeofaorticvalvereplacementwithmechanicalprosthesisinpatientswithaorticstenosisispatientprosthesismismatchasignificantclinicalproblem
AT stanisławostrowski earlyoutcomeofaorticvalvereplacementwithmechanicalprosthesisinpatientswithaorticstenosisispatientprosthesismismatchasignificantclinicalproblem
AT ryszardjaszewski earlyoutcomeofaorticvalvereplacementwithmechanicalprosthesisinpatientswithaorticstenosisispatientprosthesismismatchasignificantclinicalproblem