Developed pressure data may provide misinformation when used alone to evaluate systolic function in isovolumetric left ventricle preparations

We report data showing that developed pressure (DPmax) may lead to opposite conclusion with respect to maximal developed circumferential wall stress (<FONT FACE="Symbol">s</FONT>max) when used to assess contractile function in left ventricle isovolumic preparations. Isovolumetr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Murad, P.J.F. Tucci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 1999-06-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X1999000600014
Description
Summary:We report data showing that developed pressure (DPmax) may lead to opposite conclusion with respect to maximal developed circumferential wall stress (<FONT FACE="Symbol">s</FONT>max) when used to assess contractile function in left ventricle isovolumic preparations. Isovolumetric left ventricle preparations of rats with cardiac hypertrophy (H; N = 10) induced by isoproterenol administration showed higher DPmax (174 ± 14 mmHg) than control (C; N = 8) animals (155 ± 12 mmHg) or rats with regression (R; N = 8) of hypertrophy (144 ± 11 mmHg). In contrast, the estimated <FONT FACE="Symbol">s</FONT>max for C (145 ± 26 kdynes/cm2) and R (133 ± 17 kdynes/cm2) was higher than for H (110 ± 13 kdynes/cm2). According to Laplace's law, the opposite results of DPmax and <FONT FACE="Symbol">s</FONT>max may depend on the increased mass/volume left ventricle ratio of the hypertrophied hearts, which favored pressure generation. These results clearly show that DPmax should be used with caution to analyze systolic function.
ISSN:0100-879X
1414-431X