Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center
PurposeReview the experience of redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in comparison to primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty (PLP) and redo open pyeloplasty (ROP), and determine the feasibility and effectiveness of RLP for recurrent UPJO...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Pediatrics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.997196/full |
| _version_ | 1798002183145259008 |
|---|---|
| author | Jiayi Li Yang Yang Zonghan Li Songqiao Fan Xinyu Wang Zhenzhen Yang Pei Liu Hongcheng Song Weiping Zhang |
| author_facet | Jiayi Li Yang Yang Zonghan Li Songqiao Fan Xinyu Wang Zhenzhen Yang Pei Liu Hongcheng Song Weiping Zhang |
| author_sort | Jiayi Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | PurposeReview the experience of redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in comparison to primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty (PLP) and redo open pyeloplasty (ROP), and determine the feasibility and effectiveness of RLP for recurrent UPJO in children.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients treated with transperitoneal PLP, RLP, and ROP for UPJO from December 2015 to December 2022. The Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding variables. RLP patients were 1:4 matched with PLP and 1:3 matched with ROP. The primary outcomes were failure and post-operative complications. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system.ResultsThe study included ten patients who underwent RLP, 43 patients who underwent ROP, and 412 patients who underwent PLP. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 36 months in the RLP group, 12 to 60 months in the PLP group, and 24 to 54 months in the ROP group. In the RLP group, no failure but three post-operative complications (Clavien grade II) were observed during the follow-up. Compared with the PLP group, the older age, higher weight, larger pre-operative anteroposterior diameter (APD) and APD/cortical thickness (P/C ratio), longer operation time, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer operation time and post-operative LOS were observed in the RLP group (P < 0.05). Compared with the ROP group, the older age, higher weight, and longer post-operative LOS in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer post-operative LOS was observed in the ROP group (P < 0.05). The failure and complication rates were comparable between RLP and PLP or RLP and ROP (P > 0.05).ConclusionsOur result demonstrated that RLP performed as well as PLP except for a longer operation time. Compared with ROP, RLP has the advantages of a clearer surgical view, sufficient exposure, clearer anatomical landmark position, and minor trauma with a comparable clinical outcome. On experienced hands, RLP for recurrent UPJO after is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered an excellent alternative to the more commonly recommended ROP in select patients. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T11:49:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c9d35cf5124247bc86517ab335db03e7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-2360 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T11:49:03Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Pediatrics |
| spelling | doaj.art-c9d35cf5124247bc86517ab335db03e72022-12-22T04:25:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602022-09-011010.3389/fped.2022.997196997196Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume centerJiayi LiYang YangZonghan LiSongqiao FanXinyu WangZhenzhen YangPei LiuHongcheng SongWeiping ZhangPurposeReview the experience of redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in comparison to primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty (PLP) and redo open pyeloplasty (ROP), and determine the feasibility and effectiveness of RLP for recurrent UPJO in children.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients treated with transperitoneal PLP, RLP, and ROP for UPJO from December 2015 to December 2022. The Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding variables. RLP patients were 1:4 matched with PLP and 1:3 matched with ROP. The primary outcomes were failure and post-operative complications. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system.ResultsThe study included ten patients who underwent RLP, 43 patients who underwent ROP, and 412 patients who underwent PLP. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 36 months in the RLP group, 12 to 60 months in the PLP group, and 24 to 54 months in the ROP group. In the RLP group, no failure but three post-operative complications (Clavien grade II) were observed during the follow-up. Compared with the PLP group, the older age, higher weight, larger pre-operative anteroposterior diameter (APD) and APD/cortical thickness (P/C ratio), longer operation time, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer operation time and post-operative LOS were observed in the RLP group (P < 0.05). Compared with the ROP group, the older age, higher weight, and longer post-operative LOS in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer post-operative LOS was observed in the ROP group (P < 0.05). The failure and complication rates were comparable between RLP and PLP or RLP and ROP (P > 0.05).ConclusionsOur result demonstrated that RLP performed as well as PLP except for a longer operation time. Compared with ROP, RLP has the advantages of a clearer surgical view, sufficient exposure, clearer anatomical landmark position, and minor trauma with a comparable clinical outcome. On experienced hands, RLP for recurrent UPJO after is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered an excellent alternative to the more commonly recommended ROP in select patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.997196/fullureteropelvic junction obstructionredo laparoscopic pyeloplastyprimary laparoscopic pyeloplastyredo open pyeloplastychildren |
| spellingShingle | Jiayi Li Yang Yang Zonghan Li Songqiao Fan Xinyu Wang Zhenzhen Yang Pei Liu Hongcheng Song Weiping Zhang Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center Frontiers in Pediatrics ureteropelvic junction obstruction redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty redo open pyeloplasty children |
| title | Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center |
| title_full | Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center |
| title_fullStr | Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center |
| title_full_unstemmed | Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center |
| title_short | Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center |
| title_sort | redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction propensity score matched analyses of a high volume center |
| topic | ureteropelvic junction obstruction redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty redo open pyeloplasty children |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.997196/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jiayili redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT yangyang redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT zonghanli redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT songqiaofan redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT xinyuwang redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT zhenzhenyang redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT peiliu redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT hongchengsong redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter AT weipingzhang redolaparoscopicpyeloplastyforrecurrentureteropelvicjunctionobstructionpropensityscorematchedanalysesofahighvolumecenter |