Small-area estimates from consumer trace data

<b>Background</b>: Timely, accurate, and precise demographic estimates at various levels of geography are crucial for planning, policymaking, and analysis. In the United States, data from the decennial census and annual American Community Survey (ACS) serve as the main sources for subnat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arthur Acolin, Ari Decter-Frain, Matt Hall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2022-12-01
Series:Demographic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/47/27
_version_ 1797739431510147072
author Arthur Acolin
Ari Decter-Frain
Matt Hall
author_facet Arthur Acolin
Ari Decter-Frain
Matt Hall
author_sort Arthur Acolin
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b>: Timely, accurate, and precise demographic estimates at various levels of geography are crucial for planning, policymaking, and analysis. In the United States, data from the decennial census and annual American Community Survey (ACS) serve as the main sources for subnational demographic estimates. While estimates derived from these sources are widely regarded as accurate, their timeliness is limited and variability sizable for small geographic units like towns and neighborhoods. <b>Objective</b>: This paper investigates the potential for using nonrepresentative consumer trace data assembled by commercial vendors to produce valid and timely estimates. We focus on data purchased from Data Axle, which contains the names and addresses of over 150 million Americans annually. <b>Methods</b>: We identify the predictors of over- and undercounts of households as measured with consumer trace data and compare a range of calibration approaches to assess the extent to which systematic errors in the data can be adjusted for over time. We also demonstrate the utility of the data for predicting contemporaneous (nowcasting) tract-level household counts in the 2020 Decennial Census. <b>Results</b>: We find that adjusted counts at the county, ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA), and tract levels deviate from ACS survey-based estimates by an amount roughly equivalent to the ACS margins of error. Machine-learning methods perform best for calibration of county- and tract-level data. The estimates are stable over time and across regions of the country. We also find that when doing nowcasts, incorporating Data Axle estimates improved prediction bias relative to using the most recent ACS five-year estimates alone. <b>Contribution</b>: Despite its affordability and timeliness compared to survey-based measures, consumer trace data remains underexplored by demographers. This paper examines one consumer trace data source and demonstrates that challenges with representativeness can be overcome to produce household estimates that align with survey-based estimates and improve demographic forecasts. At the same time, the analysis also underscores the need for researchers to examine the limits of the data carefully before using them for specific applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:58:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9d78ae0b6b94c81b913d9a5bfdc5b1e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1435-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:58:09Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
record_format Article
series Demographic Research
spelling doaj.art-c9d78ae0b6b94c81b913d9a5bfdc5b1e2023-08-22T11:19:16ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712022-12-01472710.4054/DemRes.2022.47.275714Small-area estimates from consumer trace dataArthur Acolin0Ari Decter-Frain1Matt Hall2University of WashingtonCornell UniversityCornell University<b>Background</b>: Timely, accurate, and precise demographic estimates at various levels of geography are crucial for planning, policymaking, and analysis. In the United States, data from the decennial census and annual American Community Survey (ACS) serve as the main sources for subnational demographic estimates. While estimates derived from these sources are widely regarded as accurate, their timeliness is limited and variability sizable for small geographic units like towns and neighborhoods. <b>Objective</b>: This paper investigates the potential for using nonrepresentative consumer trace data assembled by commercial vendors to produce valid and timely estimates. We focus on data purchased from Data Axle, which contains the names and addresses of over 150 million Americans annually. <b>Methods</b>: We identify the predictors of over- and undercounts of households as measured with consumer trace data and compare a range of calibration approaches to assess the extent to which systematic errors in the data can be adjusted for over time. We also demonstrate the utility of the data for predicting contemporaneous (nowcasting) tract-level household counts in the 2020 Decennial Census. <b>Results</b>: We find that adjusted counts at the county, ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA), and tract levels deviate from ACS survey-based estimates by an amount roughly equivalent to the ACS margins of error. Machine-learning methods perform best for calibration of county- and tract-level data. The estimates are stable over time and across regions of the country. We also find that when doing nowcasts, incorporating Data Axle estimates improved prediction bias relative to using the most recent ACS five-year estimates alone. <b>Contribution</b>: Despite its affordability and timeliness compared to survey-based measures, consumer trace data remains underexplored by demographers. This paper examines one consumer trace data source and demonstrates that challenges with representativeness can be overcome to produce household estimates that align with survey-based estimates and improve demographic forecasts. At the same time, the analysis also underscores the need for researchers to examine the limits of the data carefully before using them for specific applications.https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/47/27calibration techniquesconsumer datanontraditional datasmall area estimation
spellingShingle Arthur Acolin
Ari Decter-Frain
Matt Hall
Small-area estimates from consumer trace data
Demographic Research
calibration techniques
consumer data
nontraditional data
small area estimation
title Small-area estimates from consumer trace data
title_full Small-area estimates from consumer trace data
title_fullStr Small-area estimates from consumer trace data
title_full_unstemmed Small-area estimates from consumer trace data
title_short Small-area estimates from consumer trace data
title_sort small area estimates from consumer trace data
topic calibration techniques
consumer data
nontraditional data
small area estimation
url https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/47/27
work_keys_str_mv AT arthuracolin smallareaestimatesfromconsumertracedata
AT aridecterfrain smallareaestimatesfromconsumertracedata
AT matthall smallareaestimatesfromconsumertracedata