Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have become omnipresent and adequate tools to generate high-resolution spatial data of agricultural cropland. Their implementation into remote sensing approaches of weeds provides suitable applications for a site-specific herbicide management. In general, an increasing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pflanz, Michael, Nordmeyer, Henning
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Julius Kühn-Institut 2016-02-01
Series:Julius-Kühn-Archiv
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6174/5856
_version_ 1818611779149758464
author Pflanz, Michael
Nordmeyer, Henning
author_facet Pflanz, Michael
Nordmeyer, Henning
author_sort Pflanz, Michael
collection DOAJ
description Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have become omnipresent and adequate tools to generate high-resolution spatial data of agricultural cropland. Their implementation into remote sensing approaches of weeds provides suitable applications for a site-specific herbicide management. In general, an increasingly use of innovative technologies gradually leads from agricultural research into the practical application. This requires an evaluation of possibilities and limits of UAV-based remote sensing procedures. While spectrals from UAVs are being used already for mapping needs of nutrient or water, the image supported weed detection is much more complex and at the moment not relevant in practice. In this regard, there is a lack of weed and crop differentiation through spectral analyses and object-based approaches separate different plants not species-specific or are not adapted to morphologic changes of the growth. Moreover, there is a need for alternative positioning techniques without GPS, as it is required for a precise optical imaging analysis at low altitudes. To evaluate the possibilities and limitations of automated weed identification regarding the optical and sampling requirements, flights were carried out with a hexacopter at an altitude of 5 m over agricultural crop land with variable weed patches. The altitude was controlled by the GPS-autopilot. Images were captured at geo-referenced points and the number of different weed species was simultaneously determined by manually counting. The required optical resolution on the ground was estimated by comparing the number of weeds between image analysis on the PC and with the field rating data.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T15:35:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9d95c5afccf457583bb8bf5c853aa4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1868-9892
1868-9892
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-16T15:35:45Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Julius Kühn-Institut
record_format Article
series Julius-Kühn-Archiv
spelling doaj.art-c9d95c5afccf457583bb8bf5c853aa4b2022-12-21T22:26:12ZdeuJulius Kühn-InstitutJulius-Kühn-Archiv1868-98921868-98922016-02-0145224124810.5073/jka.2016.452.033Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limitsPflanz, Michael0Nordmeyer, Henning1Julius-Kühn-Institut, Institut für Pflanzenschutz in Ackerbau und Grünland, Braunschweig, GermanyJulius-Kühn-Institut, Institut für Pflanzenschutz in Ackerbau und Grünland, Braunschweig, GermanyUnmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have become omnipresent and adequate tools to generate high-resolution spatial data of agricultural cropland. Their implementation into remote sensing approaches of weeds provides suitable applications for a site-specific herbicide management. In general, an increasingly use of innovative technologies gradually leads from agricultural research into the practical application. This requires an evaluation of possibilities and limits of UAV-based remote sensing procedures. While spectrals from UAVs are being used already for mapping needs of nutrient or water, the image supported weed detection is much more complex and at the moment not relevant in practice. In this regard, there is a lack of weed and crop differentiation through spectral analyses and object-based approaches separate different plants not species-specific or are not adapted to morphologic changes of the growth. Moreover, there is a need for alternative positioning techniques without GPS, as it is required for a precise optical imaging analysis at low altitudes. To evaluate the possibilities and limitations of automated weed identification regarding the optical and sampling requirements, flights were carried out with a hexacopter at an altitude of 5 m over agricultural crop land with variable weed patches. The altitude was controlled by the GPS-autopilot. Images were captured at geo-referenced points and the number of different weed species was simultaneously determined by manually counting. The required optical resolution on the ground was estimated by comparing the number of weeds between image analysis on the PC and with the field rating data.http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6174/5856herbicide applicationhexacopterprecision farmingUAVsite-specific weed managementweed distributionweeds
spellingShingle Pflanz, Michael
Nordmeyer, Henning
Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits
Julius-Kühn-Archiv
herbicide application
hexacopter
precision farming
UAV
site-specific weed management
weed distribution
weeds
title Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits
title_full Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits
title_fullStr Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits
title_full_unstemmed Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits
title_short Automated weed detection in the field - possibilities and limits
title_sort automated weed detection in the field possibilities and limits
topic herbicide application
hexacopter
precision farming
UAV
site-specific weed management
weed distribution
weeds
url http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6174/5856
work_keys_str_mv AT pflanzmichael automatedweeddetectioninthefieldpossibilitiesandlimits
AT nordmeyerhenning automatedweeddetectioninthefieldpossibilitiesandlimits