La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING
Is BE + -ING compatible or not with stative processes? In the literature, various answers are given to the question, and they usually appear with lists of exceptions. This article is about a hypothesis according to which, in any BE + -ING utterance, the aspectual point of view filters the prototypic...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
|
| Series: | Corela |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/418 |
| _version_ | 1797313876746829824 |
|---|---|
| author | Laurence Vincent-Durroux |
| author_facet | Laurence Vincent-Durroux |
| author_sort | Laurence Vincent-Durroux |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Is BE + -ING compatible or not with stative processes? In the literature, various answers are given to the question, and they usually appear with lists of exceptions. This article is about a hypothesis according to which, in any BE + -ING utterance, the aspectual point of view filters the prototypical properties associated with the notion, temporarily giving the process a stative value; the subject becomes thus the seat of the property expressed by the predicate with -ING. Used with stative processes, BE + -ING induces redundancy, and is therefore chosen by the utterer only when the context requires it. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:37:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c9da9b1c541446f384945ba717b01628 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1638-573X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:37:57Z |
| publisher | Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Corela |
| spelling | doaj.art-c9da9b1c541446f384945ba717b016282024-02-13T13:53:03ZengCercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICOCorela1638-573X4110.4000/corela.418La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -INGLaurence Vincent-DurrouxIs BE + -ING compatible or not with stative processes? In the literature, various answers are given to the question, and they usually appear with lists of exceptions. This article is about a hypothesis according to which, in any BE + -ING utterance, the aspectual point of view filters the prototypical properties associated with the notion, temporarily giving the process a stative value; the subject becomes thus the seat of the property expressed by the predicate with -ING. Used with stative processes, BE + -ING induces redundancy, and is therefore chosen by the utterer only when the context requires it.https://journals.openedition.org/corela/418BE + -INGprocessstateeventaspect |
| spellingShingle | Laurence Vincent-Durroux La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING Corela BE + -ING process state event aspect |
| title | La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING |
| title_full | La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING |
| title_fullStr | La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING |
| title_full_unstemmed | La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING |
| title_short | La nature du procès dans les énoncés en BE + -ING |
| title_sort | la nature du proces dans les enonces en be ing |
| topic | BE + -ING process state event aspect |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/418 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT laurencevincentdurroux lanatureduprocesdanslesenoncesenbeing |