Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery

Introduction: In most cases after periodontal surgery, the surgical area is covered with surgical packs. Recent studies suggest that use of periodontal packs after periodontal flap surgery is not necessary and some patients may be irritated by them. The aim of this study was to determine microbiolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Moghareh Abed, Jaber Yaghini, Narges Mazaheri Tehrani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2011-01-01
Series:مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/343
_version_ 1797727878802046976
author Ahmad Moghareh Abed
Jaber Yaghini
Narges Mazaheri Tehrani
author_facet Ahmad Moghareh Abed
Jaber Yaghini
Narges Mazaheri Tehrani
author_sort Ahmad Moghareh Abed
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In most cases after periodontal surgery, the surgical area is covered with surgical packs. Recent studies suggest that use of periodontal packs after periodontal flap surgery is not necessary and some patients may be irritated by them. The aim of this study was to determine microbiological contamination of a periodontal pack (Coe-pak) by determining microbial colony counts of surgical sutures after modified Widman flap surgery.Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, thirty-two patients needing periodontal surgeries at least in two quadrants of jaws were selected. In one quadrant, after surgery the surgical area was covered with periodontal pack randomly and the other quadrant was left without any dressing. After a week the sutures were removed and microbiological colony counts were determined. Finally microbial colony counts in the two groups were compared between the two groups by paired sample test using SPSS software (α=0.05). Results: The mean colony counts with and without periodontal pack were 10187±2900 and 9812±3042, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p value = 0.602).Conclusion: The results of this research showed that sutures have microbial contamination with or without use of periodontal packs and these materials have no effect on microbial contamination. Key words: Microbial colon, Modified Widman flap surgery, Periodontal pack (Coe-pak).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:05:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9e076219b7e4a9d92d6eb7d05c17713
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-255X
2008-6989
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:05:51Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
spelling doaj.art-c9e076219b7e4a9d92d6eb7d05c177132023-09-02T03:52:03ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciencesمجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان1735-255X2008-69892011-01-0173294299Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgeryAhmad Moghareh AbedJaber YaghiniNarges Mazaheri TehraniIntroduction: In most cases after periodontal surgery, the surgical area is covered with surgical packs. Recent studies suggest that use of periodontal packs after periodontal flap surgery is not necessary and some patients may be irritated by them. The aim of this study was to determine microbiological contamination of a periodontal pack (Coe-pak) by determining microbial colony counts of surgical sutures after modified Widman flap surgery.Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, thirty-two patients needing periodontal surgeries at least in two quadrants of jaws were selected. In one quadrant, after surgery the surgical area was covered with periodontal pack randomly and the other quadrant was left without any dressing. After a week the sutures were removed and microbiological colony counts were determined. Finally microbial colony counts in the two groups were compared between the two groups by paired sample test using SPSS software (α=0.05). Results: The mean colony counts with and without periodontal pack were 10187±2900 and 9812±3042, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p value = 0.602).Conclusion: The results of this research showed that sutures have microbial contamination with or without use of periodontal packs and these materials have no effect on microbial contamination. Key words: Microbial colon, Modified Widman flap surgery, Periodontal pack (Coe-pak).http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/343Key words: Microbial colonModified Widman flap surgeryPeriodontal pack (Coe-pak).
spellingShingle Ahmad Moghareh Abed
Jaber Yaghini
Narges Mazaheri Tehrani
Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
Key words: Microbial colon
Modified Widman flap surgery
Periodontal pack (Coe-pak).
title Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery
title_full Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery
title_short Comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified Widman flap surgery
title_sort comparative evaluation of microbial colony counts of sutures with and without use of periodontal pack after modified widman flap surgery
topic Key words: Microbial colon
Modified Widman flap surgery
Periodontal pack (Coe-pak).
url http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/343
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmogharehabed comparativeevaluationofmicrobialcolonycountsofsutureswithandwithoutuseofperiodontalpackaftermodifiedwidmanflapsurgery
AT jaberyaghini comparativeevaluationofmicrobialcolonycountsofsutureswithandwithoutuseofperiodontalpackaftermodifiedwidmanflapsurgery
AT nargesmazaheritehrani comparativeevaluationofmicrobialcolonycountsofsutureswithandwithoutuseofperiodontalpackaftermodifiedwidmanflapsurgery