A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws

The principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: syed hosein vaseghi, ghavam karimi, Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2022-03-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_14800_8baf26155b637fe3cda39965d64e0218.pdf
_version_ 1797375824521854976
author syed hosein vaseghi
ghavam karimi
Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia
author_facet syed hosein vaseghi
ghavam karimi
Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia
author_sort syed hosein vaseghi
collection DOAJ
description The principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential to effectively investigate the matter. In view of the French Code of Civil Procedure, the mentioned principle is compared in the Iranian and French legal systems. A comparative study of the two legal systems indicates that Article 564 of the French Code of Civil Procedure and the two subsequent Articles, after mentioning the said principle, specify the exceptions by pointing out the criterion. The criteria mentioned in similar instances can be generalized to reach a united criterion to be applied. After mentioning the said principle as an instance, Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure states the exception and asserts that the said instances cannot be taken as criteria and the instances under Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure should be viewed exclusively, judicial procedure has not reached the unity of procedure and the deficiency shall be amended through enacting appropriate regulations
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:29:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9f7d654c5c1423582ea683e8ff2b112
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-3583
2476-6232
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:29:49Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
spelling doaj.art-c9f7d654c5c1423582ea683e8ff2b1122023-12-26T07:49:31ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832476-62322022-03-011038456710.22054/jplr.2022.59898.255014800A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Lawssyed hosein vaseghi0ghavam karimi1Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia2Department of Law-yasooj Branch- Islamic Azad University-Yasooj- IranDepartment of Law-yasooj Branch- Islamic Azad University-Yasooj- IranDepartment of Law,yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University,Yasooj, IranThe principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential to effectively investigate the matter. In view of the French Code of Civil Procedure, the mentioned principle is compared in the Iranian and French legal systems. A comparative study of the two legal systems indicates that Article 564 of the French Code of Civil Procedure and the two subsequent Articles, after mentioning the said principle, specify the exceptions by pointing out the criterion. The criteria mentioned in similar instances can be generalized to reach a united criterion to be applied. After mentioning the said principle as an instance, Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure states the exception and asserts that the said instances cannot be taken as criteria and the instances under Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure should be viewed exclusively, judicial procedure has not reached the unity of procedure and the deficiency shall be amended through enacting appropriate regulationshttps://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_14800_8baf26155b637fe3cda39965d64e0218.pdfnew claimchange of claimancillary claimappeal hearingadditional claim
spellingShingle syed hosein vaseghi
ghavam karimi
Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia
A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
new claim
change of claim
ancillary claim
appeal hearing
additional claim
title A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
title_full A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
title_short A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
title_sort comparative study on new claim in the appeal process in iranian and french laws
topic new claim
change of claim
ancillary claim
appeal hearing
additional claim
url https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_14800_8baf26155b637fe3cda39965d64e0218.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT syedhoseinvaseghi acomparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws
AT ghavamkarimi acomparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws
AT mohamadbagheramerinia acomparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws
AT syedhoseinvaseghi comparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws
AT ghavamkarimi comparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws
AT mohamadbagheramerinia comparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws