A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws
The principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_14800_8baf26155b637fe3cda39965d64e0218.pdf |
_version_ | 1797375824521854976 |
---|---|
author | syed hosein vaseghi ghavam karimi Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia |
author_facet | syed hosein vaseghi ghavam karimi Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia |
author_sort | syed hosein vaseghi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential to effectively investigate the matter. In view of the French Code of Civil Procedure, the mentioned principle is compared in the Iranian and French legal systems. A comparative study of the two legal systems indicates that Article 564 of the French Code of Civil Procedure and the two subsequent Articles, after mentioning the said principle, specify the exceptions by pointing out the criterion. The criteria mentioned in similar instances can be generalized to reach a united criterion to be applied. After mentioning the said principle as an instance, Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure states the exception and asserts that the said instances cannot be taken as criteria and the instances under Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure should be viewed exclusively, judicial procedure has not reached the unity of procedure and the deficiency shall be amended through enacting appropriate regulations |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:29:49Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c9f7d654c5c1423582ea683e8ff2b112 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2345-3583 2476-6232 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:29:49Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī |
spelling | doaj.art-c9f7d654c5c1423582ea683e8ff2b1122023-12-26T07:49:31ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832476-62322022-03-011038456710.22054/jplr.2022.59898.255014800A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Lawssyed hosein vaseghi0ghavam karimi1Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia2Department of Law-yasooj Branch- Islamic Azad University-Yasooj- IranDepartment of Law-yasooj Branch- Islamic Azad University-Yasooj- IranDepartment of Law,yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University,Yasooj, IranThe principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential to effectively investigate the matter. In view of the French Code of Civil Procedure, the mentioned principle is compared in the Iranian and French legal systems. A comparative study of the two legal systems indicates that Article 564 of the French Code of Civil Procedure and the two subsequent Articles, after mentioning the said principle, specify the exceptions by pointing out the criterion. The criteria mentioned in similar instances can be generalized to reach a united criterion to be applied. After mentioning the said principle as an instance, Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure states the exception and asserts that the said instances cannot be taken as criteria and the instances under Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure should be viewed exclusively, judicial procedure has not reached the unity of procedure and the deficiency shall be amended through enacting appropriate regulationshttps://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_14800_8baf26155b637fe3cda39965d64e0218.pdfnew claimchange of claimancillary claimappeal hearingadditional claim |
spellingShingle | syed hosein vaseghi ghavam karimi Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī new claim change of claim ancillary claim appeal hearing additional claim |
title | A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws |
title_full | A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws |
title_short | A Comparative Study on New Claim in the Appeal Process in Iranian and French Laws |
title_sort | comparative study on new claim in the appeal process in iranian and french laws |
topic | new claim change of claim ancillary claim appeal hearing additional claim |
url | https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_14800_8baf26155b637fe3cda39965d64e0218.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT syedhoseinvaseghi acomparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws AT ghavamkarimi acomparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws AT mohamadbagheramerinia acomparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws AT syedhoseinvaseghi comparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws AT ghavamkarimi comparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws AT mohamadbagheramerinia comparativestudyonnewclaimintheappealprocessiniranianandfrenchlaws |