Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

The comparison of two paired binomial proportions is a topic of interest in statistics, with important applications in medicine. There are different methods in the statistical literature to solve this problem, and the McNemar test is the best known of all of them. The problem has been solved from a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes, Tulsi Sagar Sheth, José Fernando Vera-Vera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/190
_version_ 1797343090371985408
author José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes
Tulsi Sagar Sheth
José Fernando Vera-Vera
author_facet José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes
Tulsi Sagar Sheth
José Fernando Vera-Vera
author_sort José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes
collection DOAJ
description The comparison of two paired binomial proportions is a topic of interest in statistics, with important applications in medicine. There are different methods in the statistical literature to solve this problem, and the McNemar test is the best known of all of them. The problem has been solved from a conditioned perspective, only considering the discordant pairs, and from an unconditioned perspective, considering all of the observed values. This manuscript reviews the existing methods to solve the hypothesis test of equality for the two paired proportions and proposes new methods. Monte Carlo simulation methods were carried out to study the asymptotic behaviour of the methods studied, giving some general rules of application depending on the sample size. In general terms, the Wald test, the likelihood-ratio test, and two tests based on association measures in 2 × 2 tables can always be applied, whatever the sample size is, and if the sample size is large, then the McNemar test without a continuity correction and the modified Wald test can also be applied. The results have been applied to a real example on the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:42:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c9fdde72ab1d47a2804afe4054c50f97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:42:39Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-c9fdde72ab1d47a2804afe4054c50f972024-01-26T17:31:02ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902024-01-0112219010.3390/math12020190Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 MethodsJosé Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes0Tulsi Sagar Sheth1José Fernando Vera-Vera2Department of Statistics and Operations Research, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, SpainDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, SpainDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, SpainThe comparison of two paired binomial proportions is a topic of interest in statistics, with important applications in medicine. There are different methods in the statistical literature to solve this problem, and the McNemar test is the best known of all of them. The problem has been solved from a conditioned perspective, only considering the discordant pairs, and from an unconditioned perspective, considering all of the observed values. This manuscript reviews the existing methods to solve the hypothesis test of equality for the two paired proportions and proposes new methods. Monte Carlo simulation methods were carried out to study the asymptotic behaviour of the methods studied, giving some general rules of application depending on the sample size. In general terms, the Wald test, the likelihood-ratio test, and two tests based on association measures in 2 × 2 tables can always be applied, whatever the sample size is, and if the sample size is large, then the McNemar test without a continuity correction and the modified Wald test can also be applied. The results have been applied to a real example on the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/190hypothesis testpaired binomial proportionspowersample sizetype I error rate
spellingShingle José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes
Tulsi Sagar Sheth
José Fernando Vera-Vera
Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods
Mathematics
hypothesis test
paired binomial proportions
power
sample size
type I error rate
title Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods
title_full Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods
title_fullStr Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods
title_full_unstemmed Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods
title_short Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods
title_sort hypothesis test to compare two paired binomial proportions assessment of 24 methods
topic hypothesis test
paired binomial proportions
power
sample size
type I error rate
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/2/190
work_keys_str_mv AT joseantonioroldannofuentes hypothesistesttocomparetwopairedbinomialproportionsassessmentof24methods
AT tulsisagarsheth hypothesistesttocomparetwopairedbinomialproportionsassessmentof24methods
AT josefernandoveravera hypothesistesttocomparetwopairedbinomialproportionsassessmentof24methods