Long Follow-Up Times Weaken Observational Diet–Cancer Study Outcomes: Evidence from Studies of Meat and Cancer Risk
For years, prospective cohort studies of diet and cancer incidence have reported smaller effects than do retrospective case–control (CC) studies. The differences have been attributed to problems with CC studies, including dietary recall bias, poor matching of cases and controls, and confounding. The...
Main Author: | William B. Grant |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/1/26 |
Similar Items
-
Forecasting the Incidence of Breast, Colorectal and Bladder Cancers in North of Iran Using Time Series Models; Comparing Bayesian, ARIMA and Bootstrap Approaches
by: Ghasem Janbabaee, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
HER3 Alterations in Cancer and Potential Clinical Implications
by: Mary Kate Kilroy, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Description of the 5-Year Performance on Population Level
by: Audrius Dulskas, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
A Cohort Study Investigating Zearalenone Concentrations and Selected Steroid Levels in Patients with Sigmoid Colorectal Cancer or Colorectal Cancer
by: Sylwia Lisieska-Żołnierczyk, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
A Metabolomic Signature of Obesity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Two Nested Case–Control Studies
by: Mingjia Yang, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)