Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review

Abstract Background Seeking assent from children for participation in medical research is an ethical imperative of numerous institutions globally. However, none of these organizations provide specific guidance on the criteria or process to be used when obtaining assent. The primary objective of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florence Cayouette, Katie O’Hearn, Shira Gertsman, Kusum Menon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00844-2
_version_ 1797984709120098304
author Florence Cayouette
Katie O’Hearn
Shira Gertsman
Kusum Menon
author_facet Florence Cayouette
Katie O’Hearn
Shira Gertsman
Kusum Menon
author_sort Florence Cayouette
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Seeking assent from children for participation in medical research is an ethical imperative of numerous institutions globally. However, none of these organizations provide specific guidance on the criteria or process to be used when obtaining assent. The primary objective of this scoping review was to determine the descriptions of assent discussed in the literature and the reported criteria used for seeking assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched until November 2020 using the term “assent” in the title or abstract. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies enrolling children which specifically described operationalization of the assent process and (2) studies of the assent process which provided a description of assent. Data collected included participant information, patient criteria for seeking assent, guidelines referenced, description of assent reported, how assent was obtained and assent information presented, and reported assent rate. For qualitative articles focusing on the assent process, important themes were identified. Results A total of 116 articles were included of which 79 (68.9%) operationalized assent and 57 studies (%) described the assent process. The most commonly reported criterion used to determine the ability of a child to assent was age (35.4%, 28/79). The reported minimal age for obtaining pediatric assent varied considerably across and within jurisdictions (5–13 years; median 7.5 years, IQR 7.0, 9.75). Cognitive ability was reported as a criterion for obtaining assent in 5.1% (4/79) of studies. Assent rates were only reported in 17.7% (14/79) of citations and ranged from 32.0 to 100%. Analysis of the 57 studies describing the assent process identified several themes, including age thresholds, assessment of capacity, variable knowledge of pediatric assent and parental roles. Conclusion We found significant variation in criteria used for assessment of patient capacity, delivery of information used to obtain assent and documentation of the assent process. While we acknowledge that individual children, settings and jurisdictions may require different approaches to obtaining assent, there should be agreement on important principles to be followed with resulting common guidance on assessing capacity, delivering information and documentation of the assent process for publication.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:06:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca278a6e2da545f9ab4006f10bf9fbd3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6939
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:06:04Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Ethics
spelling doaj.art-ca278a6e2da545f9ab4006f10bf9fbd32022-12-22T04:38:23ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392022-11-0123111010.1186/s12910-022-00844-2Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping reviewFlorence Cayouette0Katie O’Hearn1Shira Gertsman2Kusum Menon3Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of OttawaCHEO Research Institute, Children’s Hospital of Eastern OntarioCHEO Research Institute, Children’s Hospital of Eastern OntarioDivision of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of OttawaAbstract Background Seeking assent from children for participation in medical research is an ethical imperative of numerous institutions globally. However, none of these organizations provide specific guidance on the criteria or process to be used when obtaining assent. The primary objective of this scoping review was to determine the descriptions of assent discussed in the literature and the reported criteria used for seeking assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched until November 2020 using the term “assent” in the title or abstract. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies enrolling children which specifically described operationalization of the assent process and (2) studies of the assent process which provided a description of assent. Data collected included participant information, patient criteria for seeking assent, guidelines referenced, description of assent reported, how assent was obtained and assent information presented, and reported assent rate. For qualitative articles focusing on the assent process, important themes were identified. Results A total of 116 articles were included of which 79 (68.9%) operationalized assent and 57 studies (%) described the assent process. The most commonly reported criterion used to determine the ability of a child to assent was age (35.4%, 28/79). The reported minimal age for obtaining pediatric assent varied considerably across and within jurisdictions (5–13 years; median 7.5 years, IQR 7.0, 9.75). Cognitive ability was reported as a criterion for obtaining assent in 5.1% (4/79) of studies. Assent rates were only reported in 17.7% (14/79) of citations and ranged from 32.0 to 100%. Analysis of the 57 studies describing the assent process identified several themes, including age thresholds, assessment of capacity, variable knowledge of pediatric assent and parental roles. Conclusion We found significant variation in criteria used for assessment of patient capacity, delivery of information used to obtain assent and documentation of the assent process. While we acknowledge that individual children, settings and jurisdictions may require different approaches to obtaining assent, there should be agreement on important principles to be followed with resulting common guidance on assessing capacity, delivering information and documentation of the assent process for publication.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00844-2AssentChildrenCapacity
spellingShingle Florence Cayouette
Katie O’Hearn
Shira Gertsman
Kusum Menon
Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review
BMC Medical Ethics
Assent
Children
Capacity
title Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review
title_full Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review
title_fullStr Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review
title_short Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review
title_sort operationalization of assent for research participation in pre adolescent children a scoping review
topic Assent
Children
Capacity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00844-2
work_keys_str_mv AT florencecayouette operationalizationofassentforresearchparticipationinpreadolescentchildrenascopingreview
AT katieohearn operationalizationofassentforresearchparticipationinpreadolescentchildrenascopingreview
AT shiragertsman operationalizationofassentforresearchparticipationinpreadolescentchildrenascopingreview
AT kusummenon operationalizationofassentforresearchparticipationinpreadolescentchildrenascopingreview