Empirical evidence of study design biases in nutrition randomised controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study
Abstract Background Instruments to critically appraise randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are based on evidence from meta-epidemiological studies. We aim to conduct a meta-epidemiological study on the average bias associated with reported methodological trial characteristics such as random sequence...
Main Authors: | Julia Stadelmaier, Isabelle Roux, Maria Petropoulou, Lukas Schwingshackl |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02540-9 |
Similar Items
-
Evaluating agreement between individual nutrition randomised controlled trials and cohort studies - a meta-epidemiological study
by: Julia Stadelmaier, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
An empirical evaluation of the impact scenario of pooling bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research
by: Nils Bröckelmann, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study
by: Nils Bröckelmann, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Biases in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies using cohort design
by: Suneth Agampodi, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
The Raine study had no evidence of significant perinatal selection bias after two decades of follow up: a longitudinal pregnancy cohort study
by: Scott W. White, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)