Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement

commonly, in the third party funding arrangments, the parties undertake not to disclose the contractual information. On the other hand, some legal systems consider transparency and access to the information of these contracts necessary in order to prevent the abuse of the third party funding, includ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: golnar banijamali, Morteza Shahbazinia
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tarbiat Modares University 2022-12-01
Series:پژوهش های حقوق تطبیقی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-54796-en.pdf
_version_ 1797216996761272320
author golnar banijamali
Morteza Shahbazinia
author_facet golnar banijamali
Morteza Shahbazinia
author_sort golnar banijamali
collection DOAJ
description commonly, in the third party funding arrangments, the parties undertake not to disclose the contractual information. On the other hand, some legal systems consider transparency and access to the information of these contracts necessary in order to prevent the abuse of the third party funding, including the prevention of Champerty. Consequently, it appears that the contractual obligation of non-disclosure is in conflict with the mandatory obligation to disclose the TPF arrangement. The main question that this article deals with is the relationship between these two contractual and legal requirements and how to balance them. In order to resolve the conflict between these two obligations, it seems that the scope of the obligation to disclose information should be narrowly interpreted and considered to be exclusive to the disclosure of the existence of theTPF contract. On the other hand, the obligation of non-disclosure includes contract details and those types of information - such as trade secrets - that are not legally required to be disclosed. Another question is whether, like the international investment arbitration, Iran's legal system also deems it necessary to disclose the TPF contract. In response to this question, it should be said that in Iran's legal system, the principle is to prohibit the disclosure of private information of persons without their consent, which includes TPF contract information. However, in cases where there are legal reasons for disclosing information, including suspicious transactions, according to Article 7 of the Anti-Money Laundering Amendment Law, the parties to the TPF contract must disclose contractual information.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:54:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca2f2ce36c9444f6853c96840f393134
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-6751
2476-6801
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:54:50Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Tarbiat Modares University
record_format Article
series پژوهش های حقوق تطبیقی
spelling doaj.art-ca2f2ce36c9444f6853c96840f3931342024-04-09T05:58:02ZfasTarbiat Modares Universityپژوهش های حقوق تطبیقی2251-67512476-68012022-12-01264137152Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangementgolnar banijamali0Morteza Shahbazinia1 University student Associate Professor of Law, Tarbiat Modares University commonly, in the third party funding arrangments, the parties undertake not to disclose the contractual information. On the other hand, some legal systems consider transparency and access to the information of these contracts necessary in order to prevent the abuse of the third party funding, including the prevention of Champerty. Consequently, it appears that the contractual obligation of non-disclosure is in conflict with the mandatory obligation to disclose the TPF arrangement. The main question that this article deals with is the relationship between these two contractual and legal requirements and how to balance them. In order to resolve the conflict between these two obligations, it seems that the scope of the obligation to disclose information should be narrowly interpreted and considered to be exclusive to the disclosure of the existence of theTPF contract. On the other hand, the obligation of non-disclosure includes contract details and those types of information - such as trade secrets - that are not legally required to be disclosed. Another question is whether, like the international investment arbitration, Iran's legal system also deems it necessary to disclose the TPF contract. In response to this question, it should be said that in Iran's legal system, the principle is to prohibit the disclosure of private information of persons without their consent, which includes TPF contract information. However, in cases where there are legal reasons for disclosing information, including suspicious transactions, according to Article 7 of the Anti-Money Laundering Amendment Law, the parties to the TPF contract must disclose contractual information.http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-54796-en.pdfthird-party fundingdisclosure of tpf contractdisclosure obligationconfidentialityinvestment arbitration.
spellingShingle golnar banijamali
Morteza Shahbazinia
Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement
پژوهش های حقوق تطبیقی
third-party funding
disclosure of tpf contract
disclosure obligation
confidentiality
investment arbitration.
title Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement
title_full Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement
title_fullStr Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement
title_full_unstemmed Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement
title_short Mandatory Disclosure of Third-Party Funding (TPF) Arrangement
title_sort mandatory disclosure of third party funding tpf arrangement
topic third-party funding
disclosure of tpf contract
disclosure obligation
confidentiality
investment arbitration.
url http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-54796-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT golnarbanijamali mandatorydisclosureofthirdpartyfundingtpfarrangement
AT mortezashahbazinia mandatorydisclosureofthirdpartyfundingtpfarrangement