Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population

The present study attempted to identify sex of an individual using a fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas in the North Indian population. The study population consisted of 134 males and 136 females aged 17 to 25 years (mean age 19.34±2.12). Ridge density (RD) at radial, ulnar and pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaur Maninder, Kaur Mankamal, Yangchan Jigmath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lodz University Press 2020-12-01
Series:Anthropological Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0025
_version_ 1827843252487716864
author Kaur Maninder
Kaur Mankamal
Yangchan Jigmath
author_facet Kaur Maninder
Kaur Mankamal
Yangchan Jigmath
author_sort Kaur Maninder
collection DOAJ
description The present study attempted to identify sex of an individual using a fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas in the North Indian population. The study population consisted of 134 males and 136 females aged 17 to 25 years (mean age 19.34±2.12). Ridge density (RD) at radial, ulnar and proximal topological areas of the distal phalanges were determined on the surface area of 25mm2. Fingerprint ridge density in a defined area was significantly higher among females as compared to their male counterparts at radial, ulnar and proximal topological areas for both hands. Sexual dimorphic ratio also supported this trend for all three counting areas in right and left hands. Univariate discriminant function analysis explained that the left 2 radial (L2R) (88.1%) had the highest percentage of accuracy for sex identification, followed by the left 3 ulnar (L3U) (82.1%) and the right 2 ulnar (R2U) (81.6%). Multivariate discriminant function analysis showed that the radial topological area of the left hand was the best predictor of sex with the overall accuracy of 84.4%with following discriminant function equation −8.263 − 0.236(L1R) + + 0.321(L2R) + 0.269(L3R) + 0.268(L4R) − 0.067(L5R).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:22:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca3795ee0b0b4a1abab7e468c1ec936b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2083-4594
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:22:04Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Lodz University Press
record_format Article
series Anthropological Review
spelling doaj.art-ca3795ee0b0b4a1abab7e468c1ec936b2023-09-02T18:21:54ZengLodz University PressAnthropological Review2083-45942020-12-0183434936110.2478/anre-2020-0025anre-2020-0025Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian populationKaur Maninder0Kaur Mankamal1Yangchan Jigmath2Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaThe present study attempted to identify sex of an individual using a fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas in the North Indian population. The study population consisted of 134 males and 136 females aged 17 to 25 years (mean age 19.34±2.12). Ridge density (RD) at radial, ulnar and proximal topological areas of the distal phalanges were determined on the surface area of 25mm2. Fingerprint ridge density in a defined area was significantly higher among females as compared to their male counterparts at radial, ulnar and proximal topological areas for both hands. Sexual dimorphic ratio also supported this trend for all three counting areas in right and left hands. Univariate discriminant function analysis explained that the left 2 radial (L2R) (88.1%) had the highest percentage of accuracy for sex identification, followed by the left 3 ulnar (L3U) (82.1%) and the right 2 ulnar (R2U) (81.6%). Multivariate discriminant function analysis showed that the radial topological area of the left hand was the best predictor of sex with the overall accuracy of 84.4%with following discriminant function equation −8.263 − 0.236(L1R) + + 0.321(L2R) + 0.269(L3R) + 0.268(L4R) − 0.067(L5R).https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0025distal phalangespredictorsridge densitysex differences
spellingShingle Kaur Maninder
Kaur Mankamal
Yangchan Jigmath
Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population
Anthropological Review
distal phalanges
predictors
ridge density
sex differences
title Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population
title_full Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population
title_fullStr Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population
title_full_unstemmed Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population
title_short Identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among North Indian population
title_sort identification of sex using discriminant function analysis of fingerprint ridge density at three topological areas among north indian population
topic distal phalanges
predictors
ridge density
sex differences
url https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0025
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurmaninder identificationofsexusingdiscriminantfunctionanalysisoffingerprintridgedensityatthreetopologicalareasamongnorthindianpopulation
AT kaurmankamal identificationofsexusingdiscriminantfunctionanalysisoffingerprintridgedensityatthreetopologicalareasamongnorthindianpopulation
AT yangchanjigmath identificationofsexusingdiscriminantfunctionanalysisoffingerprintridgedensityatthreetopologicalareasamongnorthindianpopulation