Contradicting/negative results in clinical research: Why (do we get these)? Why not (get these published)? Where (to publish)?
Obtaining negative or contradicting results, whereas conducting a study has always been overlooked as inadequacies on the part of the researcher. Many-a-times, negative results are arrived at even after conducting the study with great care and effort. This cannot be considered, a flaw, always. Contr...
Main Authors: | S Kannan, S Gowri |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2014;volume=5;issue=4;spage=151;epage=153;aulast=Kannan |
Similar Items
-
Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture
by: Natalie Matosin, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Where Are the fMRI Correlates of Phosphene Perception?
by: Tom A. de Graaf, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Neglecting the null: the pitfalls of underreporting negative results in preclinical research
by: William Foster, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01) -
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.
by: Meredith T Niles, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Why You Should Report Bayes Factors in Your Transcranial Brain Stimulation Studies
by: Anna Lena Biel, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)