Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report

Key Clinical Message With conventional mechanics to protract the upper posterior teeth for correcting Class III molar relationships, such as intra‐arch mechanics, face mask reverse‐pull headgear protraction, and interarch Class III elastics, there are some adverse effects, including diminished patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saud Alotaibi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:Clinical Case Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7394
_version_ 1797791767908581376
author Saud Alotaibi
author_facet Saud Alotaibi
author_sort Saud Alotaibi
collection DOAJ
description Key Clinical Message With conventional mechanics to protract the upper posterior teeth for correcting Class III molar relationships, such as intra‐arch mechanics, face mask reverse‐pull headgear protraction, and interarch Class III elastics, there are some adverse effects, including diminished patient compliance, the possibility of losing anchorage, and extrusion of upper molars and lower incisors with counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane. Protraction force should be directed through the center of resistance of the upper posterior teeth to prevent these side effects.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:23:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca48b4f1773748b69aea01a1bef56aa8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-0904
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:23:27Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical Case Reports
spelling doaj.art-ca48b4f1773748b69aea01a1bef56aa82023-06-30T07:34:07ZengWileyClinical Case Reports2050-09042023-06-01116n/an/a10.1002/ccr3.7394Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case reportSaud Alotaibi0Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry Majmaah University Al‐Majmaah Saudi ArabiaKey Clinical Message With conventional mechanics to protract the upper posterior teeth for correcting Class III molar relationships, such as intra‐arch mechanics, face mask reverse‐pull headgear protraction, and interarch Class III elastics, there are some adverse effects, including diminished patient compliance, the possibility of losing anchorage, and extrusion of upper molars and lower incisors with counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane. Protraction force should be directed through the center of resistance of the upper posterior teeth to prevent these side effects.https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7394class III malocclusionimpacted canineorthodontic appliance designsorthodontic camouflagetemporary anchorage devices
spellingShingle Saud Alotaibi
Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
Clinical Case Reports
class III malocclusion
impacted canine
orthodontic appliance designs
orthodontic camouflage
temporary anchorage devices
title Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
title_full Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
title_fullStr Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
title_short Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
title_sort orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo class iii malocclusion on skeletal class iii base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices a case report
topic class III malocclusion
impacted canine
orthodontic appliance designs
orthodontic camouflage
temporary anchorage devices
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7394
work_keys_str_mv AT saudalotaibi orthodonticcamouflagetreatmentofpseudoclassiiimalocclusiononskeletalclassiiibasecomplicatedwithcanineimpactiontreatedwithtemporaryanchoragedevicesacasereport