Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
Key Clinical Message With conventional mechanics to protract the upper posterior teeth for correcting Class III molar relationships, such as intra‐arch mechanics, face mask reverse‐pull headgear protraction, and interarch Class III elastics, there are some adverse effects, including diminished patie...
Main Author: | Saud Alotaibi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Clinical Case Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7394 |
Similar Items
-
Efficient Distalization of Maxillary Molars with Temporary Anchorage Devices for the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion
by: Moschos A. Papadopoulos
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Orthodontic camouflage as a treatment alternative for skeletal Class III
by: Monica Tirre de Souza ARAUJO, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Orthodontic retreatment using anchorage with miniplate to camouflage a Class III skeletal pattern
by: Marcel Marchiori Farret -
Dental Class III Camouflage Treatment Using Miniscrew Anchorage
by: Kadir Beycan, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Orthodontic camouflage treatment using a passive self-ligating system in skeletal Class III malocclusion
by: Fransiska Monika, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)