Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal hematologic neoplasm, driven, in almost all cases, by the activating <i>KIT</i> D816V mutation that leads to the growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells. While patients with advanced forms of SM have a poor prognosis, the introduction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William Shomali, Jason Gotlib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/6/2983
_version_ 1797541290773053440
author William Shomali
Jason Gotlib
author_facet William Shomali
Jason Gotlib
author_sort William Shomali
collection DOAJ
description Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal hematologic neoplasm, driven, in almost all cases, by the activating <i>KIT</i> D816V mutation that leads to the growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells. While patients with advanced forms of SM have a poor prognosis, the introduction of KIT inhibitors (e.g., midostaurin, and avapritinib) has changed their outlook. Because of the heterogenous nature of advanced SM (advSM), successive iterations of response criteria have tried to capture different dimensions of the disease, including measures of mast cell burden (percentage of bone marrow mast cells and serum tryptase level), and mast cell-related organ damage (referred to as C findings). Historically, response criteria have been anchored to reversion of one or more organ damage finding(s) as a minimal criterion for response. This is a central principle of the Valent criteria, Mayo criteria, and International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment and European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (IWG-MRT-ECNM) consensus criteria. Irrespective of the response criteria, an ever-present challenge is how to apply response criteria in patients with SM and an associated hematologic neoplasm, where the presence of both diseases complicates assignment of organ damage and adjudication of response. In the context of trials with the selective <i>KIT</i> D816V inhibitor avapritinib, pure pathologic response (PPR) criteria, which rely solely on measures of mast cell burden and exclude consideration of organ damage findings, are being explored as more robust surrogate of overall survival. In addition, the finding that avapritinib can elicit complete molecular responses of <i>KIT</i> D816V allele burden, establishes a new benchmark for advSM and motivates the inclusion of definitions for molecular response in future criteria. Herein, we also outline how the concept of PPR can inform a proposal for new response criteria which use a tiered evaluation of pathologic, molecular, and clinical responses.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:13:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca550198ca044145b200727da32b877a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:13:51Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ca550198ca044145b200727da32b877a2023-11-21T10:35:26ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672021-03-01226298310.3390/ijms22062983Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT InhibitorsWilliam Shomali0Jason Gotlib1Division of Hematology, School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute/Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-6555, USADivision of Hematology, School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute/Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-6555, USASystemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal hematologic neoplasm, driven, in almost all cases, by the activating <i>KIT</i> D816V mutation that leads to the growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells. While patients with advanced forms of SM have a poor prognosis, the introduction of KIT inhibitors (e.g., midostaurin, and avapritinib) has changed their outlook. Because of the heterogenous nature of advanced SM (advSM), successive iterations of response criteria have tried to capture different dimensions of the disease, including measures of mast cell burden (percentage of bone marrow mast cells and serum tryptase level), and mast cell-related organ damage (referred to as C findings). Historically, response criteria have been anchored to reversion of one or more organ damage finding(s) as a minimal criterion for response. This is a central principle of the Valent criteria, Mayo criteria, and International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment and European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (IWG-MRT-ECNM) consensus criteria. Irrespective of the response criteria, an ever-present challenge is how to apply response criteria in patients with SM and an associated hematologic neoplasm, where the presence of both diseases complicates assignment of organ damage and adjudication of response. In the context of trials with the selective <i>KIT</i> D816V inhibitor avapritinib, pure pathologic response (PPR) criteria, which rely solely on measures of mast cell burden and exclude consideration of organ damage findings, are being explored as more robust surrogate of overall survival. In addition, the finding that avapritinib can elicit complete molecular responses of <i>KIT</i> D816V allele burden, establishes a new benchmark for advSM and motivates the inclusion of definitions for molecular response in future criteria. Herein, we also outline how the concept of PPR can inform a proposal for new response criteria which use a tiered evaluation of pathologic, molecular, and clinical responses.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/6/2983systemic mastocytosis<i>KIT</i> D816VmidostaurinavapritinibIWG-MRT-ECNM
spellingShingle William Shomali
Jason Gotlib
Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
systemic mastocytosis
<i>KIT</i> D816V
midostaurin
avapritinib
IWG-MRT-ECNM
title Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
title_full Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
title_fullStr Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
title_short Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
title_sort response criteria in advanced systemic mastocytosis evolution in the era of kit inhibitors
topic systemic mastocytosis
<i>KIT</i> D816V
midostaurin
avapritinib
IWG-MRT-ECNM
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/6/2983
work_keys_str_mv AT williamshomali responsecriteriainadvancedsystemicmastocytosisevolutionintheeraofkitinhibitors
AT jasongotlib responsecriteriainadvancedsystemicmastocytosisevolutionintheeraofkitinhibitors