Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression

Abstract The role of lithospheric heterogeneities, presence or absence of melt, local and regional stresses, and gravitational potential energy in strain localization in continental rifts remains debated. We use new seismic and geodetic data to identify the location and orientation of the modern Nub...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: M. Musila, C. J. Ebinger, I. D. Bastow, G. Sullivan, S. J. Oliva, E. Knappe, M. Perry, R. Kounoudis, C. S. Ogden, R. Bendick, S. Mwangi, N. Mariita, G. Kianji, E. Kraus, F. Illsley‐Kemp
Materyal Türü: Makale
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Wiley 2023-09-01
Seri Bilgileri:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Konular:
Online Erişim:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC010982
_version_ 1827771558797508608
author M. Musila
C. J. Ebinger
I. D. Bastow
G. Sullivan
S. J. Oliva
E. Knappe
M. Perry
R. Kounoudis
C. S. Ogden
R. Bendick
S. Mwangi
N. Mariita
G. Kianji
E. Kraus
F. Illsley‐Kemp
author_facet M. Musila
C. J. Ebinger
I. D. Bastow
G. Sullivan
S. J. Oliva
E. Knappe
M. Perry
R. Kounoudis
C. S. Ogden
R. Bendick
S. Mwangi
N. Mariita
G. Kianji
E. Kraus
F. Illsley‐Kemp
author_sort M. Musila
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The role of lithospheric heterogeneities, presence or absence of melt, local and regional stresses, and gravitational potential energy in strain localization in continental rifts remains debated. We use new seismic and geodetic data to identify the location and orientation of the modern Nubia‐Somalia plate boundary in the 300‐km‐wide zone between the southern Main Ethiopian Rift (MER) and Eastern Rift (ER) across the Mesozoic Anza rift in the Turkana Depression. This region exhibits lithospheric heterogeneity, 45 Ma‐Recent magmatism, and more than 1,500 m of base‐level elevation change, enabling the assessment of strain localization mechanisms. We relocate 1716 earthquakes using a new 1‐D velocity model. Using a new local magnitude scaling with station corrections, we find 1 ≤ ML ≤ 4.5, and a b‐value of 1.22 ± 0.06. We present 59 first motion and 3 full moment tensor inversions, and invert for opening directions. We use complementary geodetic displacement vectors and strain rates to describe the geodetic strain field. Our seismic and geodetic strain zones demonstrate that only a small part of the 300 km‐wide region is currently active; low elevation and high‐elevation regions are active, as are areas with and without Holocene magmatism. Variations in the active plate boundary's location, orientation and strain rate appear to correspond to lithospheric heterogeneities. In the MER‐ER linkage zone, a belt of seismically fast mantle lithosphere generally lacking Recent magmatism is coincident with diffuse crustal deformation, whereas seismically slow mantle lithosphere and Recent magmatism are characterized by localized crustal strain; lithospheric heterogeneity drives strain localization.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:56:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca5a8266de9b4dc488b45e41d16c93b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:56:52Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-ca5a8266de9b4dc488b45e41d16c93b92023-11-03T17:01:04ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272023-09-01249n/an/a10.1029/2023GC010982Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana DepressionM. Musila0C. J. Ebinger1I. D. Bastow2G. Sullivan3S. J. Oliva4E. Knappe5M. Perry6R. Kounoudis7C. S. Ogden8R. Bendick9S. Mwangi10N. Mariita11G. Kianji12E. Kraus13F. Illsley‐Kemp14Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Tulane University New Orleans LA USADepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences Tulane University New Orleans LA USADepartment of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London UKDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences Tulane University New Orleans LA USASchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Victoria Victoria BC CanadaScripps Institution of Oceanography San Diego CA USAEarth Observatory of Singapore Nanyang Technical University Singapore SingaporeDepartment of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London UKSchool of Geography Geology and the Environment University of Leicester Leicester UKDepartment of Geosciences University of Montana Missoula MT USADepartment of Earth and Climate Sciences University of Nairobi Nairobi KenyaGeothermal Energy Training and Research Institute Dedan Kimathi University of Technology Nyeri KenyaDepartment of Earth and Climate Sciences University of Nairobi Nairobi KenyaDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences Tulane University New Orleans LA USASchool of Geography Environment and Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New ZealandAbstract The role of lithospheric heterogeneities, presence or absence of melt, local and regional stresses, and gravitational potential energy in strain localization in continental rifts remains debated. We use new seismic and geodetic data to identify the location and orientation of the modern Nubia‐Somalia plate boundary in the 300‐km‐wide zone between the southern Main Ethiopian Rift (MER) and Eastern Rift (ER) across the Mesozoic Anza rift in the Turkana Depression. This region exhibits lithospheric heterogeneity, 45 Ma‐Recent magmatism, and more than 1,500 m of base‐level elevation change, enabling the assessment of strain localization mechanisms. We relocate 1716 earthquakes using a new 1‐D velocity model. Using a new local magnitude scaling with station corrections, we find 1 ≤ ML ≤ 4.5, and a b‐value of 1.22 ± 0.06. We present 59 first motion and 3 full moment tensor inversions, and invert for opening directions. We use complementary geodetic displacement vectors and strain rates to describe the geodetic strain field. Our seismic and geodetic strain zones demonstrate that only a small part of the 300 km‐wide region is currently active; low elevation and high‐elevation regions are active, as are areas with and without Holocene magmatism. Variations in the active plate boundary's location, orientation and strain rate appear to correspond to lithospheric heterogeneities. In the MER‐ER linkage zone, a belt of seismically fast mantle lithosphere generally lacking Recent magmatism is coincident with diffuse crustal deformation, whereas seismically slow mantle lithosphere and Recent magmatism are characterized by localized crustal strain; lithospheric heterogeneity drives strain localization.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC010982straincrustheterogeneityseismicgeodeticmantle‐lithosphere
spellingShingle M. Musila
C. J. Ebinger
I. D. Bastow
G. Sullivan
S. J. Oliva
E. Knappe
M. Perry
R. Kounoudis
C. S. Ogden
R. Bendick
S. Mwangi
N. Mariita
G. Kianji
E. Kraus
F. Illsley‐Kemp
Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
strain
crust
heterogeneity
seismic
geodetic
mantle‐lithosphere
title Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression
title_full Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression
title_fullStr Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression
title_full_unstemmed Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression
title_short Active Deformation Constraints on the Nubia‐Somalia Plate Boundary Through Heterogenous Lithosphere of the Turkana Depression
title_sort active deformation constraints on the nubia somalia plate boundary through heterogenous lithosphere of the turkana depression
topic strain
crust
heterogeneity
seismic
geodetic
mantle‐lithosphere
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC010982
work_keys_str_mv AT mmusila activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT cjebinger activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT idbastow activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT gsullivan activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT sjoliva activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT eknappe activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT mperry activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT rkounoudis activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT csogden activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT rbendick activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT smwangi activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT nmariita activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT gkianji activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT ekraus activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression
AT fillsleykemp activedeformationconstraintsonthenubiasomaliaplateboundarythroughheterogenouslithosphereoftheturkanadepression