SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE
Implantation of polymeric heart valves can solve the problems of existing valve substitutes – mechanical and biological. Objective: to comprehensively assess the hemocompatibility of styrene-isobutylene-styrene (SIBS) triblock copolymer, synthesized by controlled cationic polymerization in compariso...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I.Shumakov
2020-02-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1108 |
| _version_ | 1797871958737551360 |
|---|---|
| author | M. A. Rezvova E. A. Ovcharenko P. A. Nikishev S. V. Kostyuk L. V. Antonova T. N. Akent’eva T. V. Glushkova Y. G. Velikanova D. K. Shishkova E. O. Krivkina K. Yu. Klyshnikov Yu. A. Kudryavtseva L. S. Barbarash |
| author_facet | M. A. Rezvova E. A. Ovcharenko P. A. Nikishev S. V. Kostyuk L. V. Antonova T. N. Akent’eva T. V. Glushkova Y. G. Velikanova D. K. Shishkova E. O. Krivkina K. Yu. Klyshnikov Yu. A. Kudryavtseva L. S. Barbarash |
| author_sort | M. A. Rezvova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Implantation of polymeric heart valves can solve the problems of existing valve substitutes – mechanical and biological. Objective: to comprehensively assess the hemocompatibility of styrene-isobutylene-styrene (SIBS) triblock copolymer, synthesized by controlled cationic polymerization in comparison with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) used in clinical practice. Materials and methods. SIBS-based films were made by polymer solution casting method; in vitro biocompatibility assessment was performed using cell cultures, determining cell viability, cell adhesion and proliferation; tendency of materials to calcify was determined through in vitro accelerated calcification; in vivo biocompatibility assessment was performed by subcutaneous implantation of rat samples; hemocompatibility was determined ex vivo by assessing the degree of hemolysis, aggregation, and platelet adhesion. Results. The molecular weight of synthesized polymer was 33,000 g/mol with a polydispersity index of 1.3. When studying cell adhesion, no significant differences (p = 0.20) between the properties of the SIBS polymer (588 cells/mm2) and the properties of culture plastics (732 cells/mm2) were discovered. Cell adhesion for the ePTFE material was 212 cells/mm2. Percentage of dead cells on SIBS and ePTFE samples was 4.40 and 4.72% (p = 0.93), respectively, for culture plastic – 1.16% (p < 0.05). Cell proliferation on the ePTFE surface (0.10%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than for the same parameters for SIBS and culture plastic (62.04 and 44.00%). Implantation results (60 days) showed the formation of fibrous capsules with average thicknesses of 42 μm (ePTFE) and 58 μm (SIBS). Calcium content in the explanted samples was 0.39 mg/g (SIBS), 1.25 mg/g (ePTFE) and 93.79 mg/g (GA-xenopericardium) (p < 0.05). Hemolysis level of red blood cells after contact with SIBS was 0.35%, ePTFE – 0.40%, which is below positive control (p < 0.05). Maximum platelet aggregation of intact platelet-rich blood plasma was 8.60%, in contact with SIBS polymer – 18.11%, with ePTFE – 22.74%. Conclusion. In terms of hemocompatibility properties, the investigated SIBS polymer is not inferior to ePTFE and can be used as a basis for development of polymeric prosthetic heart valves. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:52:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ca5e8330600845c2bcdc6660c7335d1e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1995-1191 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:52:21Z |
| publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
| publisher | Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I.Shumakov |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov |
| spelling | doaj.art-ca5e8330600845c2bcdc6660c7335d1e2023-03-13T10:37:26ZrusFederal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I.ShumakovVestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov1995-11912020-02-01214678010.15825/1995-1191-2019-4-67-80827SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFEM. A. Rezvova0E. A. Ovcharenko1P. A. Nikishev2S. V. Kostyuk3L. V. Antonova4T. N. Akent’eva5T. V. Glushkova6Y. G. Velikanova7D. K. Shishkova8E. O. Krivkina9K. Yu. Klyshnikov10Yu. A. Kudryavtseva11L. S. Barbarash12Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Physical Chemical Problems; Faculty of Chemistry, Belarusian State UniversityResearch Institute for Physical Chemical Problems; Faculty of Chemistry, Belarusian State University; Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesResearch Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesImplantation of polymeric heart valves can solve the problems of existing valve substitutes – mechanical and biological. Objective: to comprehensively assess the hemocompatibility of styrene-isobutylene-styrene (SIBS) triblock copolymer, synthesized by controlled cationic polymerization in comparison with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) used in clinical practice. Materials and methods. SIBS-based films were made by polymer solution casting method; in vitro biocompatibility assessment was performed using cell cultures, determining cell viability, cell adhesion and proliferation; tendency of materials to calcify was determined through in vitro accelerated calcification; in vivo biocompatibility assessment was performed by subcutaneous implantation of rat samples; hemocompatibility was determined ex vivo by assessing the degree of hemolysis, aggregation, and platelet adhesion. Results. The molecular weight of synthesized polymer was 33,000 g/mol with a polydispersity index of 1.3. When studying cell adhesion, no significant differences (p = 0.20) between the properties of the SIBS polymer (588 cells/mm2) and the properties of culture plastics (732 cells/mm2) were discovered. Cell adhesion for the ePTFE material was 212 cells/mm2. Percentage of dead cells on SIBS and ePTFE samples was 4.40 and 4.72% (p = 0.93), respectively, for culture plastic – 1.16% (p < 0.05). Cell proliferation on the ePTFE surface (0.10%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than for the same parameters for SIBS and culture plastic (62.04 and 44.00%). Implantation results (60 days) showed the formation of fibrous capsules with average thicknesses of 42 μm (ePTFE) and 58 μm (SIBS). Calcium content in the explanted samples was 0.39 mg/g (SIBS), 1.25 mg/g (ePTFE) and 93.79 mg/g (GA-xenopericardium) (p < 0.05). Hemolysis level of red blood cells after contact with SIBS was 0.35%, ePTFE – 0.40%, which is below positive control (p < 0.05). Maximum platelet aggregation of intact platelet-rich blood plasma was 8.60%, in contact with SIBS polymer – 18.11%, with ePTFE – 22.74%. Conclusion. In terms of hemocompatibility properties, the investigated SIBS polymer is not inferior to ePTFE and can be used as a basis for development of polymeric prosthetic heart valves.https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1108polymeric heart valve prosthesespoly(styrene‑b‑isobutylene‑b‑styrene)polytetrafluoroethylenehemocompatibility |
| spellingShingle | M. A. Rezvova E. A. Ovcharenko P. A. Nikishev S. V. Kostyuk L. V. Antonova T. N. Akent’eva T. V. Glushkova Y. G. Velikanova D. K. Shishkova E. O. Krivkina K. Yu. Klyshnikov Yu. A. Kudryavtseva L. S. Barbarash SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE Vestnik Transplantologii i Iskusstvennyh Organov polymeric heart valve prostheses poly(styrene‑b‑isobutylene‑b‑styrene) polytetrafluoroethylene hemocompatibility |
| title | SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE |
| title_full | SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE |
| title_fullStr | SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE |
| title_full_unstemmed | SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE |
| title_short | SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies in comparison with ePTFE |
| title_sort | sibs triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery i in vitro i and i in vivo i studies in comparison with eptfe |
| topic | polymeric heart valve prostheses poly(styrene‑b‑isobutylene‑b‑styrene) polytetrafluoroethylene hemocompatibility |
| url | https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1108 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marezvova sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT eaovcharenko sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT panikishev sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT svkostyuk sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT lvantonova sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT tnakenteva sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT tvglushkova sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT ygvelikanova sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT dkshishkova sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT eokrivkina sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT kyuklyshnikov sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT yuakudryavtseva sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe AT lsbarbarash sibstriblockcopolymersincardiacsurgeryiinvitroiandiinvivoistudiesincomparisonwitheptfe |