Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concordance of the physical examination (PE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison with arthroscopy, in diagnosing knee injuries. METHODS: Prospective study on 72 patients, with evaluation and comparison of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nilton Orlando Júnior, Marcos George de Souza Leão, Nelson Henrique Carvalho de Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2015-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000600712&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797225236913979392
author Nilton Orlando Júnior
Marcos George de Souza Leão
Nelson Henrique Carvalho de Oliveira
author_facet Nilton Orlando Júnior
Marcos George de Souza Leão
Nelson Henrique Carvalho de Oliveira
author_sort Nilton Orlando Júnior
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concordance of the physical examination (PE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison with arthroscopy, in diagnosing knee injuries. METHODS: Prospective study on 72 patients, with evaluation and comparison of PE, MRI and arthroscopic findings, to determine the concordance, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: PE showed sensitivity of 75.00%, specificity of 62.50% and accuracy of 69.44% for medial meniscal (MM) lesions, while it showed sensitivity of 47.82%, specificity of 93.87% and accuracy of 79.16% for lateral meniscal (LM) lesions. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, PE showed sensitivity of 88.67%, specificity of 94.73% and accuracy of 90.27%. For MM lesions, MRI showed sensitivity of 92.50%, specificity of 62.50% and accuracy of 69.44%, while for LM injuries, it showed sensitivity of 65.00%, specificity of 88.46% and accuracy of 81.94%. For ACL injuries, MRI showed sensitivity of 86.79%, specificity of 73.68% and accuracy of 83.33%. For ACL injuries, the best concordance was with PE, while for MM and LM lesions, it was with MRI ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal and ligament injuries can be diagnosed through careful physical examination, while requests for MRI are reserved for complex or doubtful cases. PE and MRI used together have high sensitivity for ACL and MM lesions, while for LM lesions the specificity is higher. Level of evidence II - Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:09:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca62cb46a78d489e844f6d827d28182f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-4378
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:05:49Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
spelling doaj.art-ca62cb46a78d489e844f6d827d28182f2024-04-03T10:36:04ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782015-12-0150671271910.1016/j.rboe.2015.10.007S0102-36162015000600712Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopyNilton Orlando JúniorMarcos George de Souza LeãoNelson Henrique Carvalho de OliveiraABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concordance of the physical examination (PE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison with arthroscopy, in diagnosing knee injuries. METHODS: Prospective study on 72 patients, with evaluation and comparison of PE, MRI and arthroscopic findings, to determine the concordance, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: PE showed sensitivity of 75.00%, specificity of 62.50% and accuracy of 69.44% for medial meniscal (MM) lesions, while it showed sensitivity of 47.82%, specificity of 93.87% and accuracy of 79.16% for lateral meniscal (LM) lesions. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, PE showed sensitivity of 88.67%, specificity of 94.73% and accuracy of 90.27%. For MM lesions, MRI showed sensitivity of 92.50%, specificity of 62.50% and accuracy of 69.44%, while for LM injuries, it showed sensitivity of 65.00%, specificity of 88.46% and accuracy of 81.94%. For ACL injuries, MRI showed sensitivity of 86.79%, specificity of 73.68% and accuracy of 83.33%. For ACL injuries, the best concordance was with PE, while for MM and LM lesions, it was with MRI ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal and ligament injuries can be diagnosed through careful physical examination, while requests for MRI are reserved for complex or doubtful cases. PE and MRI used together have high sensitivity for ACL and MM lesions, while for LM lesions the specificity is higher. Level of evidence II - Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000600712&lng=en&tlng=enTraumatismos do joelho/diagnósticoTraumatismos do joelho/terapiaMeniscos tibiais
spellingShingle Nilton Orlando Júnior
Marcos George de Souza Leão
Nelson Henrique Carvalho de Oliveira
Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Traumatismos do joelho/diagnóstico
Traumatismos do joelho/terapia
Meniscos tibiais
title Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
title_full Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
title_fullStr Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
title_short Diagnosis of knee injuries: comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
title_sort diagnosis of knee injuries comparison of the physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging with the findings from arthroscopy
topic Traumatismos do joelho/diagnóstico
Traumatismos do joelho/terapia
Meniscos tibiais
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000600712&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT niltonorlandojunior diagnosisofkneeinjuriescomparisonofthephysicalexaminationandmagneticresonanceimagingwiththefindingsfromarthroscopy
AT marcosgeorgedesouzaleao diagnosisofkneeinjuriescomparisonofthephysicalexaminationandmagneticresonanceimagingwiththefindingsfromarthroscopy
AT nelsonhenriquecarvalhodeoliveira diagnosisofkneeinjuriescomparisonofthephysicalexaminationandmagneticresonanceimagingwiththefindingsfromarthroscopy