An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.

Dichotic-listening paradigms are widely accepted as non-invasive tests of hemispheric dominance for language processing and represent a standard diagnostic tool for the assessment of developmental auditory and language disorders. Despite its popularity in research and clinical settings, dichotic par...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: René Westerhausen, Fredrik Samuelsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234665
_version_ 1818587565470515200
author René Westerhausen
Fredrik Samuelsen
author_facet René Westerhausen
Fredrik Samuelsen
author_sort René Westerhausen
collection DOAJ
description Dichotic-listening paradigms are widely accepted as non-invasive tests of hemispheric dominance for language processing and represent a standard diagnostic tool for the assessment of developmental auditory and language disorders. Despite its popularity in research and clinical settings, dichotic paradigms show comparatively low reliability, significantly threatening the validity of conclusions drawn from the results. Thus, the aim of the present work was to design and evaluate a novel, highly reliable dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric differences. Based on an extensive literature review, the paradigm was optimized to account for the main experimental variables which are known to systematically bias task performance or affect random error variance. The main design principle was to minimize the relevance of higher cognitive functions on task performance in order to obtain stimulus-driven laterality estimates. To this end, the key design features of the paradigm were the use of stop-consonant vowel (CV) syllables as stimulus material, a single stimulus pair per trial presentation mode, and a free recall (single) response instruction. Evaluating a verbal and manual response-format version of the paradigm in a sample of N = 50 healthy participants, we yielded test-retest intra-class correlations of rICC = .91 and .93 for the two response format versions. These excellent reliability estimates suggest that the optimal paradigm may offer an effective and efficient alternative to currently used paradigms both in research and diagnostic.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:10:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca743fe09c56417183f7827f0179421f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:10:53Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ca743fe09c56417183f7827f0179421f2022-12-21T22:36:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023466510.1371/journal.pone.0234665An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.René WesterhausenFredrik SamuelsenDichotic-listening paradigms are widely accepted as non-invasive tests of hemispheric dominance for language processing and represent a standard diagnostic tool for the assessment of developmental auditory and language disorders. Despite its popularity in research and clinical settings, dichotic paradigms show comparatively low reliability, significantly threatening the validity of conclusions drawn from the results. Thus, the aim of the present work was to design and evaluate a novel, highly reliable dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric differences. Based on an extensive literature review, the paradigm was optimized to account for the main experimental variables which are known to systematically bias task performance or affect random error variance. The main design principle was to minimize the relevance of higher cognitive functions on task performance in order to obtain stimulus-driven laterality estimates. To this end, the key design features of the paradigm were the use of stop-consonant vowel (CV) syllables as stimulus material, a single stimulus pair per trial presentation mode, and a free recall (single) response instruction. Evaluating a verbal and manual response-format version of the paradigm in a sample of N = 50 healthy participants, we yielded test-retest intra-class correlations of rICC = .91 and .93 for the two response format versions. These excellent reliability estimates suggest that the optimal paradigm may offer an effective and efficient alternative to currently used paradigms both in research and diagnostic.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234665
spellingShingle René Westerhausen
Fredrik Samuelsen
An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.
PLoS ONE
title An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.
title_full An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.
title_fullStr An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.
title_full_unstemmed An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.
title_short An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing.
title_sort optimal dichotic listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric dominance for speech processing
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234665
work_keys_str_mv AT renewesterhausen anoptimaldichoticlisteningparadigmfortheassessmentofhemisphericdominanceforspeechprocessing
AT fredriksamuelsen anoptimaldichoticlisteningparadigmfortheassessmentofhemisphericdominanceforspeechprocessing
AT renewesterhausen optimaldichoticlisteningparadigmfortheassessmentofhemisphericdominanceforspeechprocessing
AT fredriksamuelsen optimaldichoticlisteningparadigmfortheassessmentofhemisphericdominanceforspeechprocessing