Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery

The evaluation of the effectiveness of the automatic computer diagnostic (ACD) systems developed based on two classifiers – HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost for the laparoscopic diagnostics of appendicitis and ovarian cysts in women with chronic pelvic pain is presented. The training of HAAR feat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Bayazitov, A. Liashenko, D. Bayazitov, T. Stoeva, T. Godlevska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kazimierz Wielki University 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Education, Health and Sport
Subjects:
Online Access:https://apcz.umk.pl/JEHS/article/view/39863
_version_ 1798001774002438144
author M. Bayazitov
A. Liashenko
D. Bayazitov
T. Stoeva
T. Godlevska
author_facet M. Bayazitov
A. Liashenko
D. Bayazitov
T. Stoeva
T. Godlevska
author_sort M. Bayazitov
collection DOAJ
description The evaluation of the effectiveness of the automatic computer diagnostic (ACD) systems developed based on two classifiers – HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost for the laparoscopic diagnostics of appendicitis and ovarian cysts in women with chronic pelvic pain is presented. The training of HAAR features cascade, and AdaBoost classifiers were performed with images/ frames, which have been extracted from video gained in laparoscopic diagnostics. Both gamma-corrected RGB and RGB converted into HSV frames were used for training. Descriptors were extracted from images with the method of Local Binary Pattern (LBP), which includes both data on color characteristics («modified color LBP» - MCLBP) and textural characteristics, which have been used later on for AdaBoost classifier training. Classification of test video images revealed that the highest recall for appendicitis diagnostics was achieved after training of AdaBoost with MCLBP descriptors extracted from RGB images – 0.708, and in the case of ovarian cysts diagnostics – for MCLBP gained from RGB images – 0.886. Developed AdaBoost-based ACD system achieved a 73.6% correct classification rate (accuracy) for appendicitis and 85.4% for ovarian cysts. The accuracy of the HAAR features classifier was highest in the case of ovarian cysts identification and achieved 0.653 (RGB) – 0.708 (HSV) values. It was concluded that the HAAR feature-based cascade classifier turned to be less effective when compared with the AdaBoost classifier trained with MCLBP descriptors. Ovarian cysts were better diagnosed when compared with appendicitis with the developed ACD.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:41:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca7bb4a7bd6e448782effedbe217a3bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-8306
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:41:40Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Kazimierz Wielki University
record_format Article
series Journal of Education, Health and Sport
spelling doaj.art-ca7bb4a7bd6e448782effedbe217a3bf2022-12-22T04:25:48ZengKazimierz Wielki UniversityJournal of Education, Health and Sport2391-83062022-03-0112310.12775/JEHS.2022.12.03.025Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgeryM. Bayazitov0A. Liashenko1D. Bayazitov2T. Stoeva3T. Godlevska4Odessa National Medical UniversityOdessa National Medical UniversityOdessa National Medical UniversityOdessa National Medical UniversityOdessa National Medical University The evaluation of the effectiveness of the automatic computer diagnostic (ACD) systems developed based on two classifiers – HAAR features cascade and AdaBoost for the laparoscopic diagnostics of appendicitis and ovarian cysts in women with chronic pelvic pain is presented. The training of HAAR features cascade, and AdaBoost classifiers were performed with images/ frames, which have been extracted from video gained in laparoscopic diagnostics. Both gamma-corrected RGB and RGB converted into HSV frames were used for training. Descriptors were extracted from images with the method of Local Binary Pattern (LBP), which includes both data on color characteristics («modified color LBP» - MCLBP) and textural characteristics, which have been used later on for AdaBoost classifier training. Classification of test video images revealed that the highest recall for appendicitis diagnostics was achieved after training of AdaBoost with MCLBP descriptors extracted from RGB images – 0.708, and in the case of ovarian cysts diagnostics – for MCLBP gained from RGB images – 0.886. Developed AdaBoost-based ACD system achieved a 73.6% correct classification rate (accuracy) for appendicitis and 85.4% for ovarian cysts. The accuracy of the HAAR features classifier was highest in the case of ovarian cysts identification and achieved 0.653 (RGB) – 0.708 (HSV) values. It was concluded that the HAAR feature-based cascade classifier turned to be less effective when compared with the AdaBoost classifier trained with MCLBP descriptors. Ovarian cysts were better diagnosed when compared with appendicitis with the developed ACD. https://apcz.umk.pl/JEHS/article/view/39863machine learningimages analysisHAAR features cascadeAdaBoost classifierlaparoscopic surgery
spellingShingle M. Bayazitov
A. Liashenko
D. Bayazitov
T. Stoeva
T. Godlevska
Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
Journal of Education, Health and Sport
machine learning
images analysis
HAAR features cascade
AdaBoost classifier
laparoscopic surgery
title Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
title_full Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
title_fullStr Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
title_short Machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
title_sort machine learning with different digital images classification in laparoscopic surgery
topic machine learning
images analysis
HAAR features cascade
AdaBoost classifier
laparoscopic surgery
url https://apcz.umk.pl/JEHS/article/view/39863
work_keys_str_mv AT mbayazitov machinelearningwithdifferentdigitalimagesclassificationinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT aliashenko machinelearningwithdifferentdigitalimagesclassificationinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT dbayazitov machinelearningwithdifferentdigitalimagesclassificationinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT tstoeva machinelearningwithdifferentdigitalimagesclassificationinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT tgodlevska machinelearningwithdifferentdigitalimagesclassificationinlaparoscopicsurgery