Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion
As AI deployment has broadened, so too has an awareness for the ethical implications and problems that may ensue from this deployment. In response, groups across multiple domains have issued AI ethics standards that rely on vague, high-level principles to find consensus. One such high-level principl...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | AI |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/4/4/43 |
| _version_ | 1797382338248704000 |
|---|---|
| author | Eryn Rigley Adriane Chapman Christine Evers Will McNeill |
| author_facet | Eryn Rigley Adriane Chapman Christine Evers Will McNeill |
| author_sort | Eryn Rigley |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As AI deployment has broadened, so too has an awareness for the ethical implications and problems that may ensue from this deployment. In response, groups across multiple domains have issued AI ethics standards that rely on vague, high-level principles to find consensus. One such high-level principle that is common across the AI landscape is ‘human-centredness’, though oftentimes it is applied without due investigation into its merits and limitations and without a clear, common definition. This paper undertakes a scoping review of AI ethics standards to examine the commitment to ‘human-centredness’ and how this commitment interacts with other ethical concerns, namely, concerns for nonhumans animals and environmental wellbeing. We found that human-centred AI ethics standards tend to prioritise humans over nonhumans more so than nonhuman-centred standards. A critical analysis of our findings suggests that a commitment to human-centredness within AI ethics standards accords with the definition of anthropocentrism in moral philosophy: that humans have, at least, more intrinsic moral value than nonhumans. We consider some of the limitations of anthropocentric AI ethics, which include permitting harm to the environment and animals and undermining the stability of ecosystems. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:03:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ca84cff2d4654c13a085b5dd544f85b3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2673-2688 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:03:58Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | AI |
| spelling | doaj.art-ca84cff2d4654c13a085b5dd544f85b32023-12-22T13:46:56ZengMDPI AGAI2673-26882023-10-014484487410.3390/ai4040043Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and DiscussionEryn Rigley0Adriane Chapman1Christine Evers2Will McNeill3School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BF, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BF, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BF, UKSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BF, UKAs AI deployment has broadened, so too has an awareness for the ethical implications and problems that may ensue from this deployment. In response, groups across multiple domains have issued AI ethics standards that rely on vague, high-level principles to find consensus. One such high-level principle that is common across the AI landscape is ‘human-centredness’, though oftentimes it is applied without due investigation into its merits and limitations and without a clear, common definition. This paper undertakes a scoping review of AI ethics standards to examine the commitment to ‘human-centredness’ and how this commitment interacts with other ethical concerns, namely, concerns for nonhumans animals and environmental wellbeing. We found that human-centred AI ethics standards tend to prioritise humans over nonhumans more so than nonhuman-centred standards. A critical analysis of our findings suggests that a commitment to human-centredness within AI ethics standards accords with the definition of anthropocentrism in moral philosophy: that humans have, at least, more intrinsic moral value than nonhumans. We consider some of the limitations of anthropocentric AI ethics, which include permitting harm to the environment and animals and undermining the stability of ecosystems.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/4/4/43AI ethicshuman-centred AIenvironmental ethicsscoping reviewAI ethics standardsanthropocentrism |
| spellingShingle | Eryn Rigley Adriane Chapman Christine Evers Will McNeill Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion AI AI ethics human-centred AI environmental ethics scoping review AI ethics standards anthropocentrism |
| title | Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion |
| title_full | Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion |
| title_fullStr | Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion |
| title_short | Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion |
| title_sort | anthropocentrism and environmental wellbeing in ai ethics standards a scoping review and discussion |
| topic | AI ethics human-centred AI environmental ethics scoping review AI ethics standards anthropocentrism |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/4/4/43 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT erynrigley anthropocentrismandenvironmentalwellbeinginaiethicsstandardsascopingreviewanddiscussion AT adrianechapman anthropocentrismandenvironmentalwellbeinginaiethicsstandardsascopingreviewanddiscussion AT christineevers anthropocentrismandenvironmentalwellbeinginaiethicsstandardsascopingreviewanddiscussion AT willmcneill anthropocentrismandenvironmentalwellbeinginaiethicsstandardsascopingreviewanddiscussion |