The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
The author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of informal fallacies. While informal, the results provide presumptive evidence that those committing informal fallacies may tacitly reason as predicted by CRM. Davis has argued persuasively that Gricea...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2002-01-01
|
| Series: | Informal Logic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577 |
| _version_ | 1818536676808458240 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel N. Boone |
| author_facet | Daniel N. Boone |
| author_sort | Daniel N. Boone |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of informal fallacies. While informal, the results provide presumptive evidence that those committing informal fallacies may tacitly reason as predicted by CRM. Davis has argued persuasively that Gricean theory has not lived up to expectations, In light of his critique, the CRM analyses of Begging the Question and Equivocation are amended. Johnson has provided standards for judging any theory of informal fallacies. It is argued that CRM survives the Standard Critique and sufficiently meets Johnson's other criteria. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:41:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ca86e92160a4455388dd8a930740d556 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0824-2577 2293-734X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:41:01Z |
| publishDate | 2002-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Windsor |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Informal Logic |
| spelling | doaj.art-ca86e92160a4455388dd8a930740d5562022-12-22T00:54:36ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2002-01-0122210.22329/il.v22i2.2577The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies RevisitedDaniel N. BooneThe author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of informal fallacies. While informal, the results provide presumptive evidence that those committing informal fallacies may tacitly reason as predicted by CRM. Davis has argued persuasively that Gricean theory has not lived up to expectations, In light of his critique, the CRM analyses of Begging the Question and Equivocation are amended. Johnson has provided standards for judging any theory of informal fallacies. It is argued that CRM survives the Standard Critique and sufficiently meets Johnson's other criteria.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577cogent reasoning model of informal fallaciesReasoning Analysis Testad baculumWayne A. DavisGricebegging the question fallacy |
| spellingShingle | Daniel N. Boone The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited Informal Logic cogent reasoning model of informal fallacies Reasoning Analysis Test ad baculum Wayne A. Davis Grice begging the question fallacy |
| title | The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited |
| title_full | The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited |
| title_fullStr | The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited |
| title_short | The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited |
| title_sort | cogent reasoning model of informal fallacies revisited |
| topic | cogent reasoning model of informal fallacies Reasoning Analysis Test ad baculum Wayne A. Davis Grice begging the question fallacy |
| url | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielnboone thecogentreasoningmodelofinformalfallaciesrevisited AT danielnboone cogentreasoningmodelofinformalfallaciesrevisited |