Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2
Abstract Background In clinical settings and research studies, childbirth experience is often measured using a single-item question about overall experience. Little is known about what women include in this rating, which complicates the design of adequate follow-up, as well as the interpretation of...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5 |
_version_ | 1797863293932535808 |
---|---|
author | Frida Viirman Susanne Hesselman Inger Sundström Poromaa Agneta Skoog Svanberg Anna Wikman |
author_facet | Frida Viirman Susanne Hesselman Inger Sundström Poromaa Agneta Skoog Svanberg Anna Wikman |
author_sort | Frida Viirman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background In clinical settings and research studies, childbirth experience is often measured using a single-item question about overall experience. Little is known about what women include in this rating, which complicates the design of adequate follow-up, as well as the interpretation of research findings based on ratings of overall childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to examine which known dimensions of childbirth experience women include in the rating on a single-item measure. Methods Ratings of overall childbirth experience on a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 2953 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labour at two Swedish hospitals were evaluated against the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2), completed on one of the first days postpartum. The CEQ2 measures four childbirth experience domains: own capacity, perceived safety, professional support and participation. Internal consistency for CEQ2 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha. NRS ratings were explored in relation to CEQ2 using empirical cumulative distribution function graphs, where childbirth experience was defined as negative (NRS ratings 1–4), mixed (NRS ratings 5–6) or positive (NRS ratings 7–10). A multiple linear regression analysis, presented as beta coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was also performed to explore the relationship between the four domains of the CEQ2 and overall childbirth experience. Results The prevalence of negative childbirth experience was 6.3%. All CEQ2-subscales reached high or acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78; 0.81; 0.69 and 0.66, respectively). Regardless of overall childbirth experience, the majority of respondents scored high on the CEQ2 subscale representing professional support. Overall childbirth experience was mainly explained by perceived safety (B = 1.60, CI 1.48–1.73), followed by own capacity (B = 0.65, CI 0.53–0.77) and participation (B = 0.43, CI 0.29–0.56). Conclusions In conclusion, overall childbirth experience rated by a single-item measurement appears to mainly capture experiences of perceived safety, and to a lesser extent own capacity and participation, but appears not to reflect professional support. CEQ2 shows good psychometric properties for use shortly after childbirth, and among women with induced onset of labour, which increases the usability of the instrument. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T22:33:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ca8c3330519e4453abe94297eda610e6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2393 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T22:33:16Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
spelling | doaj.art-ca8c3330519e4453abe94297eda610e62023-03-22T12:38:46ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932023-03-0123111010.1186/s12884-023-05498-5Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2Frida Viirman0Susanne Hesselman1Inger Sundström Poromaa2Agneta Skoog Svanberg3Anna Wikman4Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityAbstract Background In clinical settings and research studies, childbirth experience is often measured using a single-item question about overall experience. Little is known about what women include in this rating, which complicates the design of adequate follow-up, as well as the interpretation of research findings based on ratings of overall childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to examine which known dimensions of childbirth experience women include in the rating on a single-item measure. Methods Ratings of overall childbirth experience on a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 2953 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labour at two Swedish hospitals were evaluated against the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2), completed on one of the first days postpartum. The CEQ2 measures four childbirth experience domains: own capacity, perceived safety, professional support and participation. Internal consistency for CEQ2 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha. NRS ratings were explored in relation to CEQ2 using empirical cumulative distribution function graphs, where childbirth experience was defined as negative (NRS ratings 1–4), mixed (NRS ratings 5–6) or positive (NRS ratings 7–10). A multiple linear regression analysis, presented as beta coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was also performed to explore the relationship between the four domains of the CEQ2 and overall childbirth experience. Results The prevalence of negative childbirth experience was 6.3%. All CEQ2-subscales reached high or acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78; 0.81; 0.69 and 0.66, respectively). Regardless of overall childbirth experience, the majority of respondents scored high on the CEQ2 subscale representing professional support. Overall childbirth experience was mainly explained by perceived safety (B = 1.60, CI 1.48–1.73), followed by own capacity (B = 0.65, CI 0.53–0.77) and participation (B = 0.43, CI 0.29–0.56). Conclusions In conclusion, overall childbirth experience rated by a single-item measurement appears to mainly capture experiences of perceived safety, and to a lesser extent own capacity and participation, but appears not to reflect professional support. CEQ2 shows good psychometric properties for use shortly after childbirth, and among women with induced onset of labour, which increases the usability of the instrument.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5Childbirth experienceBirth satisfactionLabourPsychological birth traumaCEQ2Questionnaires |
spellingShingle | Frida Viirman Susanne Hesselman Inger Sundström Poromaa Agneta Skoog Svanberg Anna Wikman Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Childbirth experience Birth satisfaction Labour Psychological birth trauma CEQ2 Questionnaires |
title | Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 |
title_full | Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 |
title_fullStr | Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 |
title_short | Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 |
title_sort | overall childbirth experience what does it mean a comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the childbirth experience questionnaire 2 |
topic | Childbirth experience Birth satisfaction Labour Psychological birth trauma CEQ2 Questionnaires |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fridaviirman overallchildbirthexperiencewhatdoesitmeanacomparisonbetweenanoverallchildbirthexperienceratingandthechildbirthexperiencequestionnaire2 AT susannehesselman overallchildbirthexperiencewhatdoesitmeanacomparisonbetweenanoverallchildbirthexperienceratingandthechildbirthexperiencequestionnaire2 AT ingersundstromporomaa overallchildbirthexperiencewhatdoesitmeanacomparisonbetweenanoverallchildbirthexperienceratingandthechildbirthexperiencequestionnaire2 AT agnetaskoogsvanberg overallchildbirthexperiencewhatdoesitmeanacomparisonbetweenanoverallchildbirthexperienceratingandthechildbirthexperiencequestionnaire2 AT annawikman overallchildbirthexperiencewhatdoesitmeanacomparisonbetweenanoverallchildbirthexperienceratingandthechildbirthexperiencequestionnaire2 |