Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone

The most common feather sampling method for feather corticosterone measurement is by plucking the feathers from the bird’s skin. This procedure performed on living, restrained birds is qualified as an animal experiment according to German/European legislation, which has to be applied for from the co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marielu Voit, Roswitha Merle, Katrin Baumgartner, Lorenzo von Fersen, Lukas Reese, Mechthild Ladwig-Wiegard, Hermann Will, Oriol Tallo-Parra, Annaïs Carbajal, Manel Lopez-Bejar, Christa Thöne-Reineke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/11/2054
_version_ 1797548704224247808
author Marielu Voit
Roswitha Merle
Katrin Baumgartner
Lorenzo von Fersen
Lukas Reese
Mechthild Ladwig-Wiegard
Hermann Will
Oriol Tallo-Parra
Annaïs Carbajal
Manel Lopez-Bejar
Christa Thöne-Reineke
author_facet Marielu Voit
Roswitha Merle
Katrin Baumgartner
Lorenzo von Fersen
Lukas Reese
Mechthild Ladwig-Wiegard
Hermann Will
Oriol Tallo-Parra
Annaïs Carbajal
Manel Lopez-Bejar
Christa Thöne-Reineke
author_sort Marielu Voit
collection DOAJ
description The most common feather sampling method for feather corticosterone measurement is by plucking the feathers from the bird’s skin. This procedure performed on living, restrained birds is qualified as an animal experiment according to German/European legislation, which has to be applied for from the competent authorities. The Directive 2010/63/EU requires the full implementation of the 3-R Principle of Russel and Burch in animal experiments, which means not only to replace the use of animals, but also to reduce the number of animals used and to refine procedures whenever possible. In response to this issue, the aim of this study was to validate an alternative, less invasive sampling method by cutting feathers close to the skin in comparison to the gold standard of plucking them. For this proof-of-principle study, a conventional poultry husbandry with trial groups of geese (<i>Anser anser domesticus</i>) and ducks (<i>Anas sterilis</i>) was selected. All birds were kept under the same living conditions to standardize the influencing factors regarding husbandry, and thus, their stress levels. Feather samples were collected between the shoulders from 46 geese and 51 ducks, both by cutting as well as by plucking, directly after slaughter for meat production. Feather corticosterone levels were measured with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Results were compared using Bland–Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). It could be seen that concordance between corticosterone levels in cut and plucked feathers was rather poor: 0.38 for <i>Anser</i>, and 0.57 for <i>Anas</i>. However, comparing the mean corticosterone values in pg/mm of each species with their respective standard deviations, the differences between the methods were negligible. As the results showed that the differences between the individuals were markedly greater than the differences between the methods, the determination of corticosterone levels in cut feathers is valid compared to using plucked feathers. The validation tests of ELISA showed only acceptable repeatability and reliability. Hence, the results should be verified in further studies. In conclusion, it is recommended for future research to use cut instead of plucked feathers for corticosterone measurement.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:03:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca9de105999f49a2bb4a00a359fa67cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:03:25Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-ca9de105999f49a2bb4a00a359fa67cf2023-11-20T19:59:48ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-11-011011205410.3390/ani10112054Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure CorticosteroneMarielu Voit0Roswitha Merle1Katrin Baumgartner2Lorenzo von Fersen3Lukas Reese4Mechthild Ladwig-Wiegard5Hermann Will6Oriol Tallo-Parra7Annaïs Carbajal8Manel Lopez-Bejar9Christa Thöne-Reineke10Animal Behaviour and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute of Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, GermanyInstitute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, GermanyTiergarten Nürnberg, Am Tiergarten 30, D-90480 Nuremberg, GermanyTiergarten Nürnberg, Am Tiergarten 30, D-90480 Nuremberg, GermanyAnimal Behaviour and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute of Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, GermanyAnimal Behaviour and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute of Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, GermanyInstitute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, GermanyVeterinary Faculty, Campus UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, SpainVeterinary Faculty, Campus UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, SpainVeterinary Faculty, Campus UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, SpainAnimal Behaviour and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute of Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, GermanyThe most common feather sampling method for feather corticosterone measurement is by plucking the feathers from the bird’s skin. This procedure performed on living, restrained birds is qualified as an animal experiment according to German/European legislation, which has to be applied for from the competent authorities. The Directive 2010/63/EU requires the full implementation of the 3-R Principle of Russel and Burch in animal experiments, which means not only to replace the use of animals, but also to reduce the number of animals used and to refine procedures whenever possible. In response to this issue, the aim of this study was to validate an alternative, less invasive sampling method by cutting feathers close to the skin in comparison to the gold standard of plucking them. For this proof-of-principle study, a conventional poultry husbandry with trial groups of geese (<i>Anser anser domesticus</i>) and ducks (<i>Anas sterilis</i>) was selected. All birds were kept under the same living conditions to standardize the influencing factors regarding husbandry, and thus, their stress levels. Feather samples were collected between the shoulders from 46 geese and 51 ducks, both by cutting as well as by plucking, directly after slaughter for meat production. Feather corticosterone levels were measured with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Results were compared using Bland–Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). It could be seen that concordance between corticosterone levels in cut and plucked feathers was rather poor: 0.38 for <i>Anser</i>, and 0.57 for <i>Anas</i>. However, comparing the mean corticosterone values in pg/mm of each species with their respective standard deviations, the differences between the methods were negligible. As the results showed that the differences between the individuals were markedly greater than the differences between the methods, the determination of corticosterone levels in cut feathers is valid compared to using plucked feathers. The validation tests of ELISA showed only acceptable repeatability and reliability. Hence, the results should be verified in further studies. In conclusion, it is recommended for future research to use cut instead of plucked feathers for corticosterone measurement.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/11/2054feather corticosteronecomparative studyplucked featherscut feathersDomestic GooseMulard Duck
spellingShingle Marielu Voit
Roswitha Merle
Katrin Baumgartner
Lorenzo von Fersen
Lukas Reese
Mechthild Ladwig-Wiegard
Hermann Will
Oriol Tallo-Parra
Annaïs Carbajal
Manel Lopez-Bejar
Christa Thöne-Reineke
Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone
Animals
feather corticosterone
comparative study
plucked feathers
cut feathers
Domestic Goose
Mulard Duck
title Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone
title_full Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone
title_fullStr Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone
title_short Validation of an Alternative Feather Sampling Method to Measure Corticosterone
title_sort validation of an alternative feather sampling method to measure corticosterone
topic feather corticosterone
comparative study
plucked feathers
cut feathers
Domestic Goose
Mulard Duck
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/11/2054
work_keys_str_mv AT marieluvoit validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT roswithamerle validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT katrinbaumgartner validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT lorenzovonfersen validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT lukasreese validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT mechthildladwigwiegard validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT hermannwill validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT orioltalloparra validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT annaiscarbajal validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT manellopezbejar validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone
AT christathonereineke validationofanalternativefeathersamplingmethodtomeasurecorticosterone