Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment

Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ling Xu, Noelle L. Fields, Megan R. Westmore, Kathryn M. Daniel, Brooke A. Troutman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Behavioral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/9/767
_version_ 1797581259763875840
author Ling Xu
Noelle L. Fields
Megan R. Westmore
Kathryn M. Daniel
Brooke A. Troutman
author_facet Ling Xu
Noelle L. Fields
Megan R. Westmore
Kathryn M. Daniel
Brooke A. Troutman
author_sort Ling Xu
collection DOAJ
description Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:02:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-caa189913a5c4e6bac44dc0a3d92078f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-328X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:02:56Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Behavioral Sciences
spelling doaj.art-caa189913a5c4e6bac44dc0a3d92078f2023-11-19T09:35:29ZengMDPI AGBehavioral Sciences2076-328X2023-09-0113976710.3390/bs13090767Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive ImpairmentLing Xu0Noelle L. Fields1Megan R. Westmore2Kathryn M. Daniel3Brooke A. Troutman4School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76010, USASchool of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76010, USASchool of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76010, USACollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76010, USAMcDermott Library, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO 80840, USADecisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/9/767assessmentdecision-making capacityolder adults with cognitive impairmentUBACC
spellingShingle Ling Xu
Noelle L. Fields
Megan R. Westmore
Kathryn M. Daniel
Brooke A. Troutman
Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
Behavioral Sciences
assessment
decision-making capacity
older adults with cognitive impairment
UBACC
title Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_full Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_fullStr Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_full_unstemmed Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_short Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
title_sort application of a decisional capacity assessment for older research participants with cognitive impairment
topic assessment
decision-making capacity
older adults with cognitive impairment
UBACC
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/9/767
work_keys_str_mv AT lingxu applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT noellelfields applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT meganrwestmore applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT kathrynmdaniel applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment
AT brookeatroutman applicationofadecisionalcapacityassessmentforolderresearchparticipantswithcognitiveimpairment