Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Previous studies have indicated a need for increased psychosocial focus on children and their families to improve children’s wellbeing and mental health. Child developmental assessments could be a place to implement changes to achieve this. A standardised record might be helpful...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah de Voss, Philip Wilson, Sofie Saxild, Gritt Overbeck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-01-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03849-x
_version_ 1828051614347296768
author Sarah de Voss
Philip Wilson
Sofie Saxild
Gritt Overbeck
author_facet Sarah de Voss
Philip Wilson
Sofie Saxild
Gritt Overbeck
author_sort Sarah de Voss
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Previous studies have indicated a need for increased psychosocial focus on children and their families to improve children’s wellbeing and mental health. Child developmental assessments could be a place to implement changes to achieve this. A standardised record might be helpful to clinicians trying to increase psychosocial focus. The aim of this study is to investigate clinical barriers and facilitators when introducing standardised child records with increased focus on psychosocial wellbeing and mental health into child developmental assessments. Methods This is a qualitative study based on 12 semi-structured interviews with four midwives and nine doctors who carry out child developmental assessments in general practice. Data is analysed in the framework of Normalisation Process Theory. Results General practice-based clinicians were positive towards increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments. The main barriers when clinicians used the standardised child records were: feeling forced to ask certain questions, in turn making the conversation rigid; leaving less room for parents to bring up other issues; making clinicians feel awkward when addressing problems that they cannot solve; the need for extended consultation time; and medico-legal concerns when registering findings. The experience of positive aspects when using the standardised child records facilitated continuous use of the records. Positive aspects included having a standardised approach to recording important findings, thereby uncovering psychosocial problems that could potentially be overlooked. Additionally, structured observation of parent–child interaction and gaining a new vocabulary to describe the findings were valued by clinicians. Balancing a standardised approach with clinicians’ ability to steer the consultation and explore topics in depth while preserving the potential for patients to bring up other issues became an important theme. Conclusion Clinicians need to be well-equipped to handle psychosocial problems through coping strategies, referral options and communication techniques in the psychosocial domain. The parent–child-interaction assessment might expose potentially dysfunctional parenting behaviours and could improve communication between health professionals. Implementing standardised child development records with an increased psychosocial focus is feasible but improvements could optimise the use of the records. Parental views on an increased psychosocial focus during child developmental assessments should be investigated prior to further implementation. Trial registration Trial registry number for the FamilieTrivsel (Family Wellbeing) trial: NCT04129359.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:41:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cad50da9b77d4ed2a59a14e1c0fe3b0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:41:22Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-cad50da9b77d4ed2a59a14e1c0fe3b0c2023-01-29T12:22:04ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312023-01-0123111110.1186/s12887-023-03849-xIncreasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative studySarah de Voss0Philip Wilson1Sofie Saxild2Gritt Overbeck3Department of Public Health, Centre for General Practice, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Public Health, Centre for General Practice, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Public Health, Centre for General Practice, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Public Health, Centre for General Practice, University of CopenhagenAbstract Background Previous studies have indicated a need for increased psychosocial focus on children and their families to improve children’s wellbeing and mental health. Child developmental assessments could be a place to implement changes to achieve this. A standardised record might be helpful to clinicians trying to increase psychosocial focus. The aim of this study is to investigate clinical barriers and facilitators when introducing standardised child records with increased focus on psychosocial wellbeing and mental health into child developmental assessments. Methods This is a qualitative study based on 12 semi-structured interviews with four midwives and nine doctors who carry out child developmental assessments in general practice. Data is analysed in the framework of Normalisation Process Theory. Results General practice-based clinicians were positive towards increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments. The main barriers when clinicians used the standardised child records were: feeling forced to ask certain questions, in turn making the conversation rigid; leaving less room for parents to bring up other issues; making clinicians feel awkward when addressing problems that they cannot solve; the need for extended consultation time; and medico-legal concerns when registering findings. The experience of positive aspects when using the standardised child records facilitated continuous use of the records. Positive aspects included having a standardised approach to recording important findings, thereby uncovering psychosocial problems that could potentially be overlooked. Additionally, structured observation of parent–child interaction and gaining a new vocabulary to describe the findings were valued by clinicians. Balancing a standardised approach with clinicians’ ability to steer the consultation and explore topics in depth while preserving the potential for patients to bring up other issues became an important theme. Conclusion Clinicians need to be well-equipped to handle psychosocial problems through coping strategies, referral options and communication techniques in the psychosocial domain. The parent–child-interaction assessment might expose potentially dysfunctional parenting behaviours and could improve communication between health professionals. Implementing standardised child development records with an increased psychosocial focus is feasible but improvements could optimise the use of the records. Parental views on an increased psychosocial focus during child developmental assessments should be investigated prior to further implementation. Trial registration Trial registry number for the FamilieTrivsel (Family Wellbeing) trial: NCT04129359.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03849-xPsychosocialMental wellbeingMental healthPreventive careChildChildren
spellingShingle Sarah de Voss
Philip Wilson
Sofie Saxild
Gritt Overbeck
Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study
BMC Pediatrics
Psychosocial
Mental wellbeing
Mental health
Preventive care
Child
Children
title Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study
title_full Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study
title_short Increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments: a qualitative study
title_sort increasing the psychosocial focus in child developmental assessments a qualitative study
topic Psychosocial
Mental wellbeing
Mental health
Preventive care
Child
Children
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03849-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahdevoss increasingthepsychosocialfocusinchilddevelopmentalassessmentsaqualitativestudy
AT philipwilson increasingthepsychosocialfocusinchilddevelopmentalassessmentsaqualitativestudy
AT sofiesaxild increasingthepsychosocialfocusinchilddevelopmentalassessmentsaqualitativestudy
AT grittoverbeck increasingthepsychosocialfocusinchilddevelopmentalassessmentsaqualitativestudy