Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States

Abstract Introduction Characteristics of patients in clinical trials may differ from those of real‐world patients. Our objective was to describe biomarker testing and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in a real‐world setting. Methods This retrospective cohort...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mo Yang, Joanna P. MacEwan, Sai Sriteja Boppudi, Monica R. McClain, Richard M. O'Hara Jr, Paul K. Paik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6694
_version_ 1827395173322063872
author Mo Yang
Joanna P. MacEwan
Sai Sriteja Boppudi
Monica R. McClain
Richard M. O'Hara Jr
Paul K. Paik
author_facet Mo Yang
Joanna P. MacEwan
Sai Sriteja Boppudi
Monica R. McClain
Richard M. O'Hara Jr
Paul K. Paik
author_sort Mo Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Characteristics of patients in clinical trials may differ from those of real‐world patients. Our objective was to describe biomarker testing and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in a real‐world setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC, and in the TEMPUS oncology dataset from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patient characteristics associated with biomarker testing were evaluated in patients with positive biomarkers using univariate logistic regression models. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate median survival. Results Of 9540 patients included, 41.7% had biomarker testing, and 2158 had a positive biomarker result. Men (vs women; odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74–0.91), Black patients (vs White; OR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72–0.97), patients with squamous (OR, 0.22; 95% CI: 0.19–0.25) or unknown histology (OR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45–0.61) (vs non‐squamous histology), and patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2+ (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57–0.84) or missing (OR, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.48–0.66) (vs ECOG PS of 0) were less likely to undergo biomarker testing. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN‐recommended treatment options (55.7%) had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75–0.95) and real‐world progression‐free survival (rwPFS) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62–0.75). Conclusion More than 50% of patients were untested for biomarkers. Patients who were less likely to be tested included men, Black patients, current smokers, patients with squamous aNSCLC, and patients with an ECOG PS of 2+. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN‐recommended treatment options had significantly longer OS and PFS.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:28:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cae17f97ca924a338f77e6f7e6945e2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:28:05Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-cae17f97ca924a338f77e6f7e6945e2f2023-12-30T08:53:25ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-12-011224216052161410.1002/cam4.6694Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United StatesMo Yang0Joanna P. MacEwan1Sai Sriteja Boppudi2Monica R. McClain3Richard M. O'Hara Jr4Paul K. Paik5EMD Serono Rockland Massachusetts USAGenesis Research Hoboken New Jersey USAGenesis Research Hoboken New Jersey USAGenesis Research Hoboken New Jersey USAEMD Serono Rockland Massachusetts USAMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USAAbstract Introduction Characteristics of patients in clinical trials may differ from those of real‐world patients. Our objective was to describe biomarker testing and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in a real‐world setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC, and in the TEMPUS oncology dataset from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patient characteristics associated with biomarker testing were evaluated in patients with positive biomarkers using univariate logistic regression models. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate median survival. Results Of 9540 patients included, 41.7% had biomarker testing, and 2158 had a positive biomarker result. Men (vs women; odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74–0.91), Black patients (vs White; OR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72–0.97), patients with squamous (OR, 0.22; 95% CI: 0.19–0.25) or unknown histology (OR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45–0.61) (vs non‐squamous histology), and patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2+ (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57–0.84) or missing (OR, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.48–0.66) (vs ECOG PS of 0) were less likely to undergo biomarker testing. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN‐recommended treatment options (55.7%) had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75–0.95) and real‐world progression‐free survival (rwPFS) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62–0.75). Conclusion More than 50% of patients were untested for biomarkers. Patients who were less likely to be tested included men, Black patients, current smokers, patients with squamous aNSCLC, and patients with an ECOG PS of 2+. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN‐recommended treatment options had significantly longer OS and PFS.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6694advanced NSCLCbiomarker testingoutcomesreal‐world datatargeted therapy
spellingShingle Mo Yang
Joanna P. MacEwan
Sai Sriteja Boppudi
Monica R. McClain
Richard M. O'Hara Jr
Paul K. Paik
Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States
Cancer Medicine
advanced NSCLC
biomarker testing
outcomes
real‐world data
targeted therapy
title Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States
title_full Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States
title_fullStr Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States
title_short Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in the United States
title_sort diagnosis testing treatment and outcomes among patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer in the united states
topic advanced NSCLC
biomarker testing
outcomes
real‐world data
targeted therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6694
work_keys_str_mv AT moyang diagnosistestingtreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerintheunitedstates
AT joannapmacewan diagnosistestingtreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerintheunitedstates
AT saisritejaboppudi diagnosistestingtreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerintheunitedstates
AT monicarmcclain diagnosistestingtreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerintheunitedstates
AT richardmoharajr diagnosistestingtreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerintheunitedstates
AT paulkpaik diagnosistestingtreatmentandoutcomesamongpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerintheunitedstates