Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study was to compare surgical and refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy (P-Trab) and phaco with Ex-PRESS (P-Ex-PRESS) for glaucoma at a 6-month follow-up. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 81 eyes; 43 eyes (53%) and 38 eyes (47%) were assigned to the P-E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanna Konopińska, Anna Byszewska, Emil Saeed, Zofia Mariak, Marek Rękas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/424
_version_ 1797408265165864960
author Joanna Konopińska
Anna Byszewska
Emil Saeed
Zofia Mariak
Marek Rękas
author_facet Joanna Konopińska
Anna Byszewska
Emil Saeed
Zofia Mariak
Marek Rękas
author_sort Joanna Konopińska
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to compare surgical and refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy (P-Trab) and phaco with Ex-PRESS (P-Ex-PRESS) for glaucoma at a 6-month follow-up. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 81 eyes; 43 eyes (53%) and 38 eyes (47%) were assigned to the P-Ex-PRESS and P-Trab groups, respectively. Refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), and best-corrected visual acuity were measured. Refractive change was analyzed using the cylinder’s magnitude, and polar analysis assessed the change in the trend of astigmatism [with-the-rule, against-the-rule (ATR), oblique (OBL)], evaluating mean astigmatism in centroid form. All patients showed a statistically significant postoperative decrease in IOP (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in terms of postoperative IOP and visual outcomes or in astigmatism preoperatively or postoperatively (<i>P</i> = 0.61, <i>P</i> = 0.74). In both groups, the mean preoperative and postoperative astigmatism were ATR and OBL, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative centroids in the P-Ex-PRESS group were 0.44 ± 1.32 D at 177° and 0.35 ± 1 D at 8°, respectively, (<i>P</i> = 0.5) and in the P-Trab group were 0.16 ± 1.5 D at 141° and 0.39 ± 1.38 D at 29°, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.38). Both P-Ex-PRESS and P-Trab showed comparable antihypertensive efficacy in treating open-angle glaucoma over 6 months. Preoperative and postoperative astigmatism did not differ between groups. The groups showed comparable results for final visual acuity.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:55:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cae996927f714c2abca907a19095bb24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:55:56Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-cae996927f714c2abca907a19095bb242023-12-03T14:20:28ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-01-0110342410.3390/jcm10030424Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled TrialJoanna Konopińska0Anna Byszewska1Emil Saeed2Zofia Mariak3Marek Rękas4Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Białystok, M. Sklodowska-Curie 24A STR, 15-276 Białystok, PolandDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Szaserów 128 STR, 04-141 Warszawa, PolandDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Białystok, M. Sklodowska-Curie 24A STR, 15-276 Białystok, PolandDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Białystok, M. Sklodowska-Curie 24A STR, 15-276 Białystok, PolandDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Szaserów 128 STR, 04-141 Warszawa, PolandThe aim of this study was to compare surgical and refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy (P-Trab) and phaco with Ex-PRESS (P-Ex-PRESS) for glaucoma at a 6-month follow-up. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 81 eyes; 43 eyes (53%) and 38 eyes (47%) were assigned to the P-Ex-PRESS and P-Trab groups, respectively. Refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), and best-corrected visual acuity were measured. Refractive change was analyzed using the cylinder’s magnitude, and polar analysis assessed the change in the trend of astigmatism [with-the-rule, against-the-rule (ATR), oblique (OBL)], evaluating mean astigmatism in centroid form. All patients showed a statistically significant postoperative decrease in IOP (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in terms of postoperative IOP and visual outcomes or in astigmatism preoperatively or postoperatively (<i>P</i> = 0.61, <i>P</i> = 0.74). In both groups, the mean preoperative and postoperative astigmatism were ATR and OBL, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative centroids in the P-Ex-PRESS group were 0.44 ± 1.32 D at 177° and 0.35 ± 1 D at 8°, respectively, (<i>P</i> = 0.5) and in the P-Trab group were 0.16 ± 1.5 D at 141° and 0.39 ± 1.38 D at 29°, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.38). Both P-Ex-PRESS and P-Trab showed comparable antihypertensive efficacy in treating open-angle glaucoma over 6 months. Preoperative and postoperative astigmatism did not differ between groups. The groups showed comparable results for final visual acuity.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/424astigmatismglaucomaintraocular pressurephacotrabeculectomyEx-PRESS device
spellingShingle Joanna Konopińska
Anna Byszewska
Emil Saeed
Zofia Mariak
Marek Rękas
Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Clinical Medicine
astigmatism
glaucoma
intraocular pressure
phacotrabeculectomy
Ex-PRESS device
title Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phaco with Implantation of the Ex-PRESS Device: Surgical and Refractive Outcomes—A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort phacotrabeculectomy versus phaco with implantation of the ex press device surgical and refractive outcomes a randomized controlled trial
topic astigmatism
glaucoma
intraocular pressure
phacotrabeculectomy
Ex-PRESS device
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/424
work_keys_str_mv AT joannakonopinska phacotrabeculectomyversusphacowithimplantationoftheexpressdevicesurgicalandrefractiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT annabyszewska phacotrabeculectomyversusphacowithimplantationoftheexpressdevicesurgicalandrefractiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT emilsaeed phacotrabeculectomyversusphacowithimplantationoftheexpressdevicesurgicalandrefractiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zofiamariak phacotrabeculectomyversusphacowithimplantationoftheexpressdevicesurgicalandrefractiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marekrekas phacotrabeculectomyversusphacowithimplantationoftheexpressdevicesurgicalandrefractiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial