Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming

AbstractIn this study, we examine how to enhance the climate integrity of carbon credits from carbon farming practices. The key requirements for climate integrity include permanence, additionality, and measurement and verification. Farmers are typically willing to make carbon contracts for a finite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanna Lötjönen, Kati Kulovesi, Kristiina Lång, Markku Ollikainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-03-01
Series:Carbon Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17583004.2024.2329593
_version_ 1797229812751794176
author Sanna Lötjönen
Kati Kulovesi
Kristiina Lång
Markku Ollikainen
author_facet Sanna Lötjönen
Kati Kulovesi
Kristiina Lång
Markku Ollikainen
author_sort Sanna Lötjönen
collection DOAJ
description AbstractIn this study, we examine how to enhance the climate integrity of carbon credits from carbon farming practices. The key requirements for climate integrity include permanence, additionality, and measurement and verification. Farmers are typically willing to make carbon contracts for a finite time only in voluntary markets or with the government and receive carbon credits to sell as offsets. This contradicts the requirement of the permanence of carbon sequestered in soils. To solve this problem and to facilitate greater participation by farmers in carbon sequestration, we show how temporary contracts can be made to address the issue of permanence by using offset ratios. The notion of the offset ratio refers to the share of one emission unit that one unit of temporary sequestered carbon replaces. Thus, the offset ratio transforms temporary sequestration to permanent emissions reductions. We propose the use of a discounting method to calculate the offset ratio. The ratio varies with the carbon contract length, employed discount rate, and assumptions about the evolution of the soil carbon stock. We apply this approach to cultivating catch crops for carbon sequestration on a north‒south gradient in Finland, Denmark, and France. We show that the offset ratio approach works well for every selected country. Carbon farming contracts are profitable for farmers provided that revenue under the contract exceeds that in the baseline. Profitability is highly dependent on catch crop cost, annual increase in soil carbon, and the discount rate. We apply offset ratios to assess the climate integrity of some existing crediting programs and find that the discounting method yields a lower offset ratio in almost all cases yielding a lower number of credits than launched in these programs.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:18:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-caea2b9f2e8b4afa9934d7b36cbe5a7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1758-3004
1758-3012
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:18:33Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Carbon Management
spelling doaj.art-caea2b9f2e8b4afa9934d7b36cbe5a7e2024-04-02T08:49:19ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCarbon Management1758-30041758-30122024-03-0115110.1080/17583004.2024.2329593Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farmingSanna Lötjönen0Kati Kulovesi1Kristiina Lång2Markku Ollikainen3Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandUniversity of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, FinlandNatural Resources Institute Finland, Jokioinen, FinlandDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandAbstractIn this study, we examine how to enhance the climate integrity of carbon credits from carbon farming practices. The key requirements for climate integrity include permanence, additionality, and measurement and verification. Farmers are typically willing to make carbon contracts for a finite time only in voluntary markets or with the government and receive carbon credits to sell as offsets. This contradicts the requirement of the permanence of carbon sequestered in soils. To solve this problem and to facilitate greater participation by farmers in carbon sequestration, we show how temporary contracts can be made to address the issue of permanence by using offset ratios. The notion of the offset ratio refers to the share of one emission unit that one unit of temporary sequestered carbon replaces. Thus, the offset ratio transforms temporary sequestration to permanent emissions reductions. We propose the use of a discounting method to calculate the offset ratio. The ratio varies with the carbon contract length, employed discount rate, and assumptions about the evolution of the soil carbon stock. We apply this approach to cultivating catch crops for carbon sequestration on a north‒south gradient in Finland, Denmark, and France. We show that the offset ratio approach works well for every selected country. Carbon farming contracts are profitable for farmers provided that revenue under the contract exceeds that in the baseline. Profitability is highly dependent on catch crop cost, annual increase in soil carbon, and the discount rate. We apply offset ratios to assess the climate integrity of some existing crediting programs and find that the discounting method yields a lower offset ratio in almost all cases yielding a lower number of credits than launched in these programs.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17583004.2024.2329593Carbon farmingcarbon creditoffset ratiopermanencediscounting methodQ15
spellingShingle Sanna Lötjönen
Kati Kulovesi
Kristiina Lång
Markku Ollikainen
Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
Carbon Management
Carbon farming
carbon credit
offset ratio
permanence
discounting method
Q15
title Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
title_full Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
title_fullStr Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
title_full_unstemmed Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
title_short Offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
title_sort offset ratios and temporary contract designs for climate integrity in carbon farming
topic Carbon farming
carbon credit
offset ratio
permanence
discounting method
Q15
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17583004.2024.2329593
work_keys_str_mv AT sannalotjonen offsetratiosandtemporarycontractdesignsforclimateintegrityincarbonfarming
AT katikulovesi offsetratiosandtemporarycontractdesignsforclimateintegrityincarbonfarming
AT kristiinalang offsetratiosandtemporarycontractdesignsforclimateintegrityincarbonfarming
AT markkuollikainen offsetratiosandtemporarycontractdesignsforclimateintegrityincarbonfarming