Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.

Access to facilities, services and socio-economic opportunities plays a critical role in the growth and decline of cities and human settlements. Previous attempts to explain changes in socio-economic indicators by differences in accessibility have not been convincing as countries with highly develop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samiul Hasan, Xiaoming Wang, Yong Bing Khoo, Greg Foliente
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5479555?pdf=render
_version_ 1811193660136488960
author Samiul Hasan
Xiaoming Wang
Yong Bing Khoo
Greg Foliente
author_facet Samiul Hasan
Xiaoming Wang
Yong Bing Khoo
Greg Foliente
author_sort Samiul Hasan
collection DOAJ
description Access to facilities, services and socio-economic opportunities plays a critical role in the growth and decline of cities and human settlements. Previous attempts to explain changes in socio-economic indicators by differences in accessibility have not been convincing as countries with highly developed transport infrastructure have only seen marginal benefits of infrastructure improvements. Australia offers an ideal case for investigating the effects of accessibility on development since it is seen as home to some of the most liveable cities in the world while, at the same time, it also has some of the most isolated settlements. We investigate herein the connectivity and accessibility of all 1814 human settlements (population centers exceeding 200 persons) in Australia, and how they relate to the socio-economic characteristics of, and opportunities in, each population center. Assuming population as a proxy indicator of available opportunities, we present a simple ranking metric for a settlement using the number of population and the distance required to access all other settlements (and the corresponding opportunities therein). We find a strikingly unequal distribution of access to opportunities in Australia, with a marked prominence of opportunities in capital cities in four of the eight states. The two largest cities of Sydney and Melbourne have a dominant position across all socio-economic indicators, compared to all the other cities. In general, we observe across all the settlements that a decrease in access to opportunities is associated with relatively greater socio-economic disadvantage including increased median age and unemployment rate and decreased median household income. Our methodology can be used to better understand the potential benefits of improved accessibility based on infrastructure development, especially for remote areas and for cities and towns with many socio-economically disadvantaged population.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:13:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb13024911964b6987c963acf38a66e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:13:01Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-cb13024911964b6987c963acf38a66e62022-12-22T03:55:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e017962010.1371/journal.pone.0179620Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.Samiul HasanXiaoming WangYong Bing KhooGreg FolienteAccess to facilities, services and socio-economic opportunities plays a critical role in the growth and decline of cities and human settlements. Previous attempts to explain changes in socio-economic indicators by differences in accessibility have not been convincing as countries with highly developed transport infrastructure have only seen marginal benefits of infrastructure improvements. Australia offers an ideal case for investigating the effects of accessibility on development since it is seen as home to some of the most liveable cities in the world while, at the same time, it also has some of the most isolated settlements. We investigate herein the connectivity and accessibility of all 1814 human settlements (population centers exceeding 200 persons) in Australia, and how they relate to the socio-economic characteristics of, and opportunities in, each population center. Assuming population as a proxy indicator of available opportunities, we present a simple ranking metric for a settlement using the number of population and the distance required to access all other settlements (and the corresponding opportunities therein). We find a strikingly unequal distribution of access to opportunities in Australia, with a marked prominence of opportunities in capital cities in four of the eight states. The two largest cities of Sydney and Melbourne have a dominant position across all socio-economic indicators, compared to all the other cities. In general, we observe across all the settlements that a decrease in access to opportunities is associated with relatively greater socio-economic disadvantage including increased median age and unemployment rate and decreased median household income. Our methodology can be used to better understand the potential benefits of improved accessibility based on infrastructure development, especially for remote areas and for cities and towns with many socio-economically disadvantaged population.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5479555?pdf=render
spellingShingle Samiul Hasan
Xiaoming Wang
Yong Bing Khoo
Greg Foliente
Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.
PLoS ONE
title Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.
title_full Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.
title_fullStr Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.
title_full_unstemmed Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.
title_short Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements.
title_sort accessibility and socio economic development of human settlements
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5479555?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT samiulhasan accessibilityandsocioeconomicdevelopmentofhumansettlements
AT xiaomingwang accessibilityandsocioeconomicdevelopmentofhumansettlements
AT yongbingkhoo accessibilityandsocioeconomicdevelopmentofhumansettlements
AT gregfoliente accessibilityandsocioeconomicdevelopmentofhumansettlements