CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?

<p>Fluctuations in atmospheric <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> can be measured with great precision and are used to identify human-driven sources as well as natural cycles of ocean and land carbon. One source of variability is the stratosphe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. J. Prather
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-04-01
Series:Earth System Dynamics
Online Access:https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/703/2022/esd-13-703-2022.pdf
_version_ 1818755586145124352
author M. J. Prather
author_facet M. J. Prather
author_sort M. J. Prather
collection DOAJ
description <p>Fluctuations in atmospheric <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> can be measured with great precision and are used to identify human-driven sources as well as natural cycles of ocean and land carbon. One source of variability is the stratosphere, where the influx of aged <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>-depleted air can produce fluctuations at the surface. This process has been speculated to be a potential source of interannual variability (IAV) in <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> that might obscure the quantification of other sources of IAV. Given the recent success in demonstrating that the stratospheric influx of <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span>- and chlorofluorocarbon-depleted air is a dominant source of their surface IAV in the Southern Hemisphere, I apply the same model and measurement analysis here to <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>. Using chemistry-transport modeling or scaling of the observed <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> variability, I find that the stratosphere-driven surface variability in <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> is at most 10 % of the observed IAV and is not an important source. Diagnosing the amplitude of the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> annual cycle and its increase from 1985 to 2021 through the annual variance gives rates similar to traditional methods in the Northern Hemisphere (BRW, MLO) but can identify the emergence of small trends (0.08 ppm per decade) in the Southern Hemisphere (SMO, CGO).</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T05:41:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb275d3c959842f3b36e0b087538d036
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2190-4979
2190-4987
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T05:41:30Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Earth System Dynamics
spelling doaj.art-cb275d3c959842f3b36e0b087538d0362022-12-21T21:19:10ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth System Dynamics2190-49792190-49872022-04-011370370910.5194/esd-13-703-2022CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?M. J. Prather<p>Fluctuations in atmospheric <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> can be measured with great precision and are used to identify human-driven sources as well as natural cycles of ocean and land carbon. One source of variability is the stratosphere, where the influx of aged <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>-depleted air can produce fluctuations at the surface. This process has been speculated to be a potential source of interannual variability (IAV) in <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> that might obscure the quantification of other sources of IAV. Given the recent success in demonstrating that the stratospheric influx of <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span>- and chlorofluorocarbon-depleted air is a dominant source of their surface IAV in the Southern Hemisphere, I apply the same model and measurement analysis here to <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>. Using chemistry-transport modeling or scaling of the observed <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span> variability, I find that the stratosphere-driven surface variability in <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> is at most 10 % of the observed IAV and is not an important source. Diagnosing the amplitude of the <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> annual cycle and its increase from 1985 to 2021 through the annual variance gives rates similar to traditional methods in the Northern Hemisphere (BRW, MLO) but can identify the emergence of small trends (0.08 ppm per decade) in the Southern Hemisphere (SMO, CGO).</p>https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/703/2022/esd-13-703-2022.pdf
spellingShingle M. J. Prather
CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
Earth System Dynamics
title CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
title_full CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
title_fullStr CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
title_full_unstemmed CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
title_short CO<sub>2</sub> surface variability: from the stratosphere or not?
title_sort co sub 2 sub surface variability from the stratosphere or not
url https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/13/703/2022/esd-13-703-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mjprather cosub2subsurfacevariabilityfromthestratosphereornot