Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea
University facilities have significant effects on education and research and should be systematically maintained and managed. The Performance Indicator (PI) implicitly discloses the range of work scope and helps facility managers to achieve the goals and objectives of an organization. Much has been...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.313 |
| _version_ | 1827878317322141696 |
|---|---|
| author | Yujin Kim Min Soo Kim Jun Ha Kim |
| author_facet | Yujin Kim Min Soo Kim Jun Ha Kim |
| author_sort | Yujin Kim |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | University facilities have significant effects on education and research and should be systematically maintained and managed. The Performance Indicator (PI) implicitly discloses the range of work scope and helps facility managers to achieve the goals and objectives of an organization. Much has been said about the importance of facility management (FM), however, there is no specific standard or guideline pertaining to FM services for campus facilities in Korea. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to provide facility managers with rigidly selected PIs for improving the quality of FM service of campus facilities. PIs are collected through intensive analysis of primary literature related to FM services and educational facilities. The 44 preselected PIs fell into four areas as classified in the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Delphi survey was conducted twice to identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Finally, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) and Kendall′s W are used to analyze the results. The priority on all the 44 PIs was set by considering four sections in the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and finalization of the total of 8 KPIs. This research will serve as a guideline for campus facility managers in making decisions for improving the quality of FM services. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:49:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cb303bdd22c1435193ce096312747bf4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1347-2852 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:49:53Z |
| publishDate | 2018-05-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering |
| spelling | doaj.art-cb303bdd22c1435193ce096312747bf42023-08-03T09:15:32ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering1347-28522018-05-0117231332010.3130/jaabe.17.31312029194Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in KoreaYujin Kim0Min Soo Kim1Jun Ha Kim2Georgia Institute of TechnologyKyung Hee UniversityKyung Hee UniversityUniversity facilities have significant effects on education and research and should be systematically maintained and managed. The Performance Indicator (PI) implicitly discloses the range of work scope and helps facility managers to achieve the goals and objectives of an organization. Much has been said about the importance of facility management (FM), however, there is no specific standard or guideline pertaining to FM services for campus facilities in Korea. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to provide facility managers with rigidly selected PIs for improving the quality of FM service of campus facilities. PIs are collected through intensive analysis of primary literature related to FM services and educational facilities. The 44 preselected PIs fell into four areas as classified in the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Delphi survey was conducted twice to identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Finally, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) and Kendall′s W are used to analyze the results. The priority on all the 44 PIs was set by considering four sections in the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and finalization of the total of 8 KPIs. This research will serve as a guideline for campus facility managers in making decisions for improving the quality of FM services.http://dx.doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.313university facilitiesfacility management (fm)balanced scorecard (bsc)key performance indicators (kpis)importance-performance analysis (ipa) |
| spellingShingle | Yujin Kim Min Soo Kim Jun Ha Kim Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering university facilities facility management (fm) balanced scorecard (bsc) key performance indicators (kpis) importance-performance analysis (ipa) |
| title | Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea |
| title_full | Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea |
| title_fullStr | Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea |
| title_full_unstemmed | Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea |
| title_short | Development of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of University Facility Management Services in Korea |
| title_sort | development of key performance indicators for the improvement of university facility management services in korea |
| topic | university facilities facility management (fm) balanced scorecard (bsc) key performance indicators (kpis) importance-performance analysis (ipa) |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.313 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yujinkim developmentofkeyperformanceindicatorsfortheimprovementofuniversityfacilitymanagementservicesinkorea AT minsookim developmentofkeyperformanceindicatorsfortheimprovementofuniversityfacilitymanagementservicesinkorea AT junhakim developmentofkeyperformanceindicatorsfortheimprovementofuniversityfacilitymanagementservicesinkorea |