GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?

It seems evident that an international body of law such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (hereinafter “ CISG” or “ Convention” )1 cannot be exhaustive2. As it is difficult to cover all necessary matters, there must be provisions to fill gaps when one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lucia Carvalhal Sica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Open Publishing 2006-01-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
Online Access:https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3044
_version_ 1797229073062166528
author Lucia Carvalhal Sica
author_facet Lucia Carvalhal Sica
author_sort Lucia Carvalhal Sica
collection DOAJ
description It seems evident that an international body of law such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (hereinafter “ CISG” or “ Convention” )1 cannot be exhaustive2. As it is difficult to cover all necessary matters, there must be provisions to fill gaps when one faces issues which are not dealt with by an instrument of law such as the Convention. Thus, it is essential that all treaties have a provision regarding gapfilling to guide in cases where there is an omission or lack of specific rules. The CISG, as other similar Conventions3, refers to general principles regarding gapfilling in its article 7(2). As shall be further discussed in this paper, recourse to general principles will be made whenever there is a gap, and, as ultima ratio one will reach to domestic law rules to fill gaps. On the other hand, if there are no gaps, there shall not be recourse to general principles, but solely to the specific provisions and rules set forth in the Convention. Under the CISG, due to the party autonomy principle, parties can stipulate in the contract which rules and/or principles will be taken into consideration to fill in any gaps. In fact, in practice, it is common that the parties do not specify how to fill gaps, notwithstanding their ability to do so under the party autonomy principle. This paper will, therefore, disregard parties’ provisions regarding gapfilling and consider possibilities as if there were no agreement in this respect. In cases that the parties of a contract under the CISG do not provide for filling of gaps, there is a discussion whether external principles, such as the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts4 (“UNIDROIT Principles” ) are able to fill those. The UNIDROIT Principles were first enacted in 1994 and stated in their preamble the idea of supplementing other international uniform law instruments. Hence, the main issue that will be analyzed in this paper is the possibility of filling CISG gaps with the UNIDROIT Principles.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:06:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb334a14d64f4b978d4441c4bcac2a24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:06:47Z
publishDate 2006-01-01
publisher Aalborg University Open Publishing
record_format Article
series Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
spelling doaj.art-cb334a14d64f4b978d4441c4bcac2a242024-04-02T13:02:25ZengAalborg University Open PublishingNordic Journal of Commercial Law1459-96862006-01-011GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?Lucia Carvalhal SicaIt seems evident that an international body of law such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (hereinafter “ CISG” or “ Convention” )1 cannot be exhaustive2. As it is difficult to cover all necessary matters, there must be provisions to fill gaps when one faces issues which are not dealt with by an instrument of law such as the Convention. Thus, it is essential that all treaties have a provision regarding gapfilling to guide in cases where there is an omission or lack of specific rules. The CISG, as other similar Conventions3, refers to general principles regarding gapfilling in its article 7(2). As shall be further discussed in this paper, recourse to general principles will be made whenever there is a gap, and, as ultima ratio one will reach to domestic law rules to fill gaps. On the other hand, if there are no gaps, there shall not be recourse to general principles, but solely to the specific provisions and rules set forth in the Convention. Under the CISG, due to the party autonomy principle, parties can stipulate in the contract which rules and/or principles will be taken into consideration to fill in any gaps. In fact, in practice, it is common that the parties do not specify how to fill gaps, notwithstanding their ability to do so under the party autonomy principle. This paper will, therefore, disregard parties’ provisions regarding gapfilling and consider possibilities as if there were no agreement in this respect. In cases that the parties of a contract under the CISG do not provide for filling of gaps, there is a discussion whether external principles, such as the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts4 (“UNIDROIT Principles” ) are able to fill those. The UNIDROIT Principles were first enacted in 1994 and stated in their preamble the idea of supplementing other international uniform law instruments. Hence, the main issue that will be analyzed in this paper is the possibility of filling CISG gaps with the UNIDROIT Principles.https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3044
spellingShingle Lucia Carvalhal Sica
GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?
Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
title GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?
title_full GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?
title_fullStr GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?
title_full_unstemmed GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?
title_short GAPFILLING IN THE CISG:MAY THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES SUPPLEMENT THE GAPS IN THE CONVENTION?
title_sort gapfilling in the cisg may the unidroit principles supplement the gaps in the convention
url https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3044
work_keys_str_mv AT luciacarvalhalsica gapfillinginthecisgmaytheunidroitprinciplessupplementthegapsintheconvention