The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose

“Every portrait that is painted with feeling is a portrait of the artist, not of the sitter…It is not he who is revealed by the painter; it is rather the painter who, on the coloured canvas, reveals himself,” explains the painter who created the evolving portrait of Dorian Gray. Guillaume de Lorris...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barbara Peklar
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2017-07-01
Series:Ars & Humanitas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/7472
_version_ 1797950126476492800
author Barbara Peklar
author_facet Barbara Peklar
author_sort Barbara Peklar
collection DOAJ
description “Every portrait that is painted with feeling is a portrait of the artist, not of the sitter…It is not he who is revealed by the painter; it is rather the painter who, on the coloured canvas, reveals himself,” explains the painter who created the evolving portrait of Dorian Gray. Guillaume de Lorris, the author of the medieval poem Roman de la Rose, also presents his soul through the character of the ideal lover, so Amans is a kind of self-portrait. But unlike an ordinary self-portrait, this one does not present the author’s personality. It is painted with words, and such an ekphrastic image is universal or influences the reader in ways that can be explained by the Iser’s reader-response theory. The poem enables the reader to feel love, and transforms him into the ideal courtly lover. As distinct from a painting, the invisible ekphrastic image in this text surpasses appearances and presents the reader with a hidden side of his soul. The object represented by ekphrasis does not exist in the outer world, therefore in the example examined here the reader’s other self is brought into existence. In contrast to a painted self-portrait, which represents the identity of the author, since the picture and the pictured are identical, a word is a sign which refers to something else. A verbal self-portrait which expresses the author’s feelings opens itself up to the reader, who has to complete the image with his imagination. This imaginary image then differs from the external appearance, because it reveals the associated feelings, enables the reader to feel what the author feels, and presents the reader with his other self. The imaginary self-portrait thus does not represent the actual self, but the self that is transformed or improved by the art of love.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:10:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb3479799b8044489e7991af93fd6cd1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1854-9632
2350-4218
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:10:16Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Ars & Humanitas
spelling doaj.art-cb3479799b8044489e7991af93fd6cd12023-01-18T08:53:37ZdeuUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Ars & Humanitas1854-96322350-42182017-07-0111110.4312/ars.11.1.90-105The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la RoseBarbara Peklar “Every portrait that is painted with feeling is a portrait of the artist, not of the sitter…It is not he who is revealed by the painter; it is rather the painter who, on the coloured canvas, reveals himself,” explains the painter who created the evolving portrait of Dorian Gray. Guillaume de Lorris, the author of the medieval poem Roman de la Rose, also presents his soul through the character of the ideal lover, so Amans is a kind of self-portrait. But unlike an ordinary self-portrait, this one does not present the author’s personality. It is painted with words, and such an ekphrastic image is universal or influences the reader in ways that can be explained by the Iser’s reader-response theory. The poem enables the reader to feel love, and transforms him into the ideal courtly lover. As distinct from a painting, the invisible ekphrastic image in this text surpasses appearances and presents the reader with a hidden side of his soul. The object represented by ekphrasis does not exist in the outer world, therefore in the example examined here the reader’s other self is brought into existence. In contrast to a painted self-portrait, which represents the identity of the author, since the picture and the pictured are identical, a word is a sign which refers to something else. A verbal self-portrait which expresses the author’s feelings opens itself up to the reader, who has to complete the image with his imagination. This imaginary image then differs from the external appearance, because it reveals the associated feelings, enables the reader to feel what the author feels, and presents the reader with his other self. The imaginary self-portrait thus does not represent the actual self, but the self that is transformed or improved by the art of love. https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/7472ekphrasisRoman de la RoseGuillaume de Lorristhe Fountain of Narcissuspersonificationperformativity
spellingShingle Barbara Peklar
The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose
Ars & Humanitas
ekphrasis
Roman de la Rose
Guillaume de Lorris
the Fountain of Narcissus
personification
performativity
title The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose
title_full The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose
title_fullStr The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose
title_full_unstemmed The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose
title_short The Imaginary Self-portrait in the Poem Roman de la Rose
title_sort imaginary self portrait in the poem roman de la rose
topic ekphrasis
Roman de la Rose
Guillaume de Lorris
the Fountain of Narcissus
personification
performativity
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/7472
work_keys_str_mv AT barbarapeklar theimaginaryselfportraitinthepoemromandelarose
AT barbarapeklar imaginaryselfportraitinthepoemromandelarose