Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis
Abstract Background The role of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is controversial. CT cholangiography (CTC) provides a reliable assessment of biliary anatomy, potentially reducing operating times, open conversion, and complication rates. This study aims to a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02089-1 |
_version_ | 1827911045735251968 |
---|---|
author | Douglas Chung |
author_facet | Douglas Chung |
author_sort | Douglas Chung |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The role of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is controversial. CT cholangiography (CTC) provides a reliable assessment of biliary anatomy, potentially reducing operating times, open conversion, and complication rates. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of routine pre-operative CTC. Methods A single centre retrospective analysis was undertaken of all elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021. Information was obtained from a general surgical database alongside hospital electronic medical records. T-tests and Chi2 tests were used to assess statistical significance. Results Of 1079 patients, 129 (12.0%) underwent routine pre-operative CTC, 786 (72.8%) routine IOC, and 161 patients (14.9%) neither modality. Comparing CTC and IOC, the CTC group had higher rates of open conversion (3.1% vs. 0.6%, p 0.009), subtotal cholecystectomies (3.1% vs. 0.8%, p 0.018), and length of stay (1.47 vs. 1.18 nights, p 0.015). Comparing the prior groups together against those utilising neither modality, the latter had reduced operative time (66.29 vs. 72.47, p 0.011), but increased rate of bile leak (1.9% vs. 0.4%, p 0.037) and bile duct injury (1.2% vs. 0.2%, p 0.049). Co-dependence between operative complications was noted in linear regression. Conclusion Biliary imaging with either CTC or IOC is beneficial in reducing bile leak and bile duct injury, and its routine use LC is recommended. However, routine CTC is inferior to routine IOC in preventing conversions to open surgery and subtotal cholecystectomy. Further research may be undertaken to evaluate criteria for a selective CTC protocol. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T01:58:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cb48fd3dcc0a4f5b856027bc15540299 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2482 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T01:58:45Z |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-cb48fd3dcc0a4f5b856027bc155402992023-07-02T11:05:37ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822023-06-012311510.1186/s12893-023-02089-1Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysisDouglas Chung0Campbelltown HospitalAbstract Background The role of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is controversial. CT cholangiography (CTC) provides a reliable assessment of biliary anatomy, potentially reducing operating times, open conversion, and complication rates. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of routine pre-operative CTC. Methods A single centre retrospective analysis was undertaken of all elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021. Information was obtained from a general surgical database alongside hospital electronic medical records. T-tests and Chi2 tests were used to assess statistical significance. Results Of 1079 patients, 129 (12.0%) underwent routine pre-operative CTC, 786 (72.8%) routine IOC, and 161 patients (14.9%) neither modality. Comparing CTC and IOC, the CTC group had higher rates of open conversion (3.1% vs. 0.6%, p 0.009), subtotal cholecystectomies (3.1% vs. 0.8%, p 0.018), and length of stay (1.47 vs. 1.18 nights, p 0.015). Comparing the prior groups together against those utilising neither modality, the latter had reduced operative time (66.29 vs. 72.47, p 0.011), but increased rate of bile leak (1.9% vs. 0.4%, p 0.037) and bile duct injury (1.2% vs. 0.2%, p 0.049). Co-dependence between operative complications was noted in linear regression. Conclusion Biliary imaging with either CTC or IOC is beneficial in reducing bile leak and bile duct injury, and its routine use LC is recommended. However, routine CTC is inferior to routine IOC in preventing conversions to open surgery and subtotal cholecystectomy. Further research may be undertaken to evaluate criteria for a selective CTC protocol.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02089-1 |
spellingShingle | Douglas Chung Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis BMC Surgery |
title | Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | Comparison of pre-operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | comparison of pre operative computed tomography cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy a retrospective analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02089-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglaschung comparisonofpreoperativecomputedtomographycholangiographyandintraoperativecholangiographyinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyaretrospectiveanalysis |