ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers
Abstract Medical imaging capable of generating imaging biomarkers, specifically radiology and nuclear medicine image acquisition and analysis processes, differs from frequently used comparators like blood or urine biomarkers. This difference arises from the sample acquisition methodology. While diff...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Insights into Imaging |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-020-00872-9 |
| _version_ | 1819296560336338944 |
|---|---|
| author | European Society of Radiology (ESR) |
| author_facet | European Society of Radiology (ESR) |
| author_sort | European Society of Radiology (ESR) |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Medical imaging capable of generating imaging biomarkers, specifically radiology and nuclear medicine image acquisition and analysis processes, differs from frequently used comparators like blood or urine biomarkers. This difference arises from the sample acquisition methodology. While different analysis methodologies and equipment provide slightly different results in any analytical domain, unlike blood or urine analysis where the samples are obtained by simple extraction or excretion, in radiology the acquisition of the sample is heterogeneous by design, since complex equipment from different vendors is used. Therefore, with this additional degree of freedom in medical imaging, there is still risk of persistent heterogeneity of image quality through time, due to different technological implementations across vendors and protocols used in different centres. Quantitative imaging biomarkers have yet to demonstrate an impact on clinical practice due to this lack of comprehensive standardisation in terms of technical aspects of image acquisition, analysis algorithms, processes and clinical validation. The aim is establishing a standard methodology based on metrology for the validation of image acquisition and analysis methods used in the extraction of biomarkers and radiomics data. The appropriate implementation of the guidelines herein proposed by radiology departments, research institutes and industry will allow for a significant reduction in inter-vendor & inter-centre variability in imaging biomarkers and determine the measurement error obtained, enabling them to be used in imaging-based criteria for diagnosis, prognosis or treatment response, ultimately improving clinical workflows and patient care. The validation of developed analytical methods must be based on a technical performance validation and clinical validation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T05:00:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cb4a0d6ef5d04f88bd6f98a622fda95d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1869-4101 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T05:00:03Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Insights into Imaging |
| spelling | doaj.art-cb4a0d6ef5d04f88bd6f98a622fda95d2022-12-21T17:14:14ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012020-06-011111510.1186/s13244-020-00872-9ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging BiomarkersEuropean Society of Radiology (ESR)Abstract Medical imaging capable of generating imaging biomarkers, specifically radiology and nuclear medicine image acquisition and analysis processes, differs from frequently used comparators like blood or urine biomarkers. This difference arises from the sample acquisition methodology. While different analysis methodologies and equipment provide slightly different results in any analytical domain, unlike blood or urine analysis where the samples are obtained by simple extraction or excretion, in radiology the acquisition of the sample is heterogeneous by design, since complex equipment from different vendors is used. Therefore, with this additional degree of freedom in medical imaging, there is still risk of persistent heterogeneity of image quality through time, due to different technological implementations across vendors and protocols used in different centres. Quantitative imaging biomarkers have yet to demonstrate an impact on clinical practice due to this lack of comprehensive standardisation in terms of technical aspects of image acquisition, analysis algorithms, processes and clinical validation. The aim is establishing a standard methodology based on metrology for the validation of image acquisition and analysis methods used in the extraction of biomarkers and radiomics data. The appropriate implementation of the guidelines herein proposed by radiology departments, research institutes and industry will allow for a significant reduction in inter-vendor & inter-centre variability in imaging biomarkers and determine the measurement error obtained, enabling them to be used in imaging-based criteria for diagnosis, prognosis or treatment response, ultimately improving clinical workflows and patient care. The validation of developed analytical methods must be based on a technical performance validation and clinical validation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-020-00872-9Imaging biomarkersMetrologyValidationAccuracyPrecision |
| spellingShingle | European Society of Radiology (ESR) ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers Insights into Imaging Imaging biomarkers Metrology Validation Accuracy Precision |
| title | ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers |
| title_full | ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers |
| title_fullStr | ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers |
| title_full_unstemmed | ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers |
| title_short | ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers |
| title_sort | esr statement on the validation of imaging biomarkers |
| topic | Imaging biomarkers Metrology Validation Accuracy Precision |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-020-00872-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT europeansocietyofradiologyesr esrstatementonthevalidationofimagingbiomarkers |