Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke

Background: The evaluation of DWI/FLAIR mismatch in ischaemic stroke patients with unknown, time from onset can determine the treatment strategy. This approach is based on, visual assessment and may be subject to insufficient inter-rater agreement. Objective: To compare the inter-rater agreement of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Civrny, Z. Sedlackova, T. Malenak, P. Kucera, D. Machal, M. Kocher, D. Sanak, T. Furst, M. Cerna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:European Journal of Radiology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235204772300014X
_version_ 1797802198772482048
author J. Civrny
Z. Sedlackova
T. Malenak
P. Kucera
D. Machal
M. Kocher
D. Sanak
T. Furst
M. Cerna
author_facet J. Civrny
Z. Sedlackova
T. Malenak
P. Kucera
D. Machal
M. Kocher
D. Sanak
T. Furst
M. Cerna
author_sort J. Civrny
collection DOAJ
description Background: The evaluation of DWI/FLAIR mismatch in ischaemic stroke patients with unknown, time from onset can determine the treatment strategy. This approach is based on, visual assessment and may be subject to insufficient inter-rater agreement. Objective: To compare the inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR MRI and proposed region of interest (ROI) semiquantitative method in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. Methods: Five readers have analysed MRIs of 104 patients obtained within six hours of the onset of stroke symptoms resulting from LVO visually and semi-quantitatively. For the semiquantitative analysis, a ROI method was used to obtain relative signal intensity compared to the unaffected side. Cut-off values of 1.15 and 1.10 were tested. The analysis yielded FLAIR-positive (abnormal) and negative (normal) findings. Percentage agreement and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated. Results: The visual agreement of 5/5 readers and ≥ 4/5 readers occurred in 31% and 59% of cases respectively. Semi-quantitative evaluation using a cut-off value of 1.15 increased the agreements to 67% and 88% respectively. The agreement of visual evaluation was fair. The semi-quantitative method utilising the cut-off of 1.15 had moderate agreement although it increased the number of FLAIR-negative results compared to the visual evaluation. A low cut-off value of 1.10 didn’t improve the agreement significantly. Conclusion: The inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR in patients with short-duration large vessel occlusion stroke was fair. The high cut-off value of semiquantitative evaluation increased the agreement although it changed the proportion of FLAIR positive and negative results.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:02:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb50a41be87d4981ae54de3782da500a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-0477
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:02:41Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Journal of Radiology Open
spelling doaj.art-cb50a41be87d4981ae54de3782da500a2023-06-17T05:18:54ZengElsevierEuropean Journal of Radiology Open2352-04772023-01-0110100488Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic strokeJ. Civrny0Z. Sedlackova1T. Malenak2P. Kucera3D. Machal4M. Kocher5D. Sanak6T. Furst7M. Cerna8Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Correspondence to: University Hospital Olomouc, Department of Radiology, Krizkovskeho 511/8 185/6, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic.Department of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Neurology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Mathematical Analysis and Applications of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiology, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech RepublicBackground: The evaluation of DWI/FLAIR mismatch in ischaemic stroke patients with unknown, time from onset can determine the treatment strategy. This approach is based on, visual assessment and may be subject to insufficient inter-rater agreement. Objective: To compare the inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR MRI and proposed region of interest (ROI) semiquantitative method in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. Methods: Five readers have analysed MRIs of 104 patients obtained within six hours of the onset of stroke symptoms resulting from LVO visually and semi-quantitatively. For the semiquantitative analysis, a ROI method was used to obtain relative signal intensity compared to the unaffected side. Cut-off values of 1.15 and 1.10 were tested. The analysis yielded FLAIR-positive (abnormal) and negative (normal) findings. Percentage agreement and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated. Results: The visual agreement of 5/5 readers and ≥ 4/5 readers occurred in 31% and 59% of cases respectively. Semi-quantitative evaluation using a cut-off value of 1.15 increased the agreements to 67% and 88% respectively. The agreement of visual evaluation was fair. The semi-quantitative method utilising the cut-off of 1.15 had moderate agreement although it increased the number of FLAIR-negative results compared to the visual evaluation. A low cut-off value of 1.10 didn’t improve the agreement significantly. Conclusion: The inter-rater agreement of visual evaluation of FLAIR in patients with short-duration large vessel occlusion stroke was fair. The high cut-off value of semiquantitative evaluation increased the agreement although it changed the proportion of FLAIR positive and negative results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235204772300014XMagnetic resonance imagingIschemic strokeMismatch
spellingShingle J. Civrny
Z. Sedlackova
T. Malenak
P. Kucera
D. Machal
M. Kocher
D. Sanak
T. Furst
M. Cerna
Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
European Journal of Radiology Open
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ischemic stroke
Mismatch
title Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
title_full Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
title_fullStr Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
title_short Comparison of semi-quantitative and visual assessment of early MRI signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
title_sort comparison of semi quantitative and visual assessment of early mri signal evolution in acute ischaemic stroke
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
Ischemic stroke
Mismatch
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235204772300014X
work_keys_str_mv AT jcivrny comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT zsedlackova comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT tmalenak comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT pkucera comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT dmachal comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT mkocher comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT dsanak comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT tfurst comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke
AT mcerna comparisonofsemiquantitativeandvisualassessmentofearlymrisignalevolutioninacuteischaemicstroke