The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members

Abstract Background Acute injuries are a burden on the Military Health System and degrade service members’ ability to train and deploy. Long-term injuries contribute to early attrition and increase disability costs. To properly quantify acute injuries and evaluate injury prevention programs, injurie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew C. Inscore, Katherine R. Gonzales, Christopher P. Rennix, Bruce H. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-08-01
Series:Injury Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-018-0162-y
_version_ 1819018639636955136
author Matthew C. Inscore
Katherine R. Gonzales
Christopher P. Rennix
Bruce H. Jones
author_facet Matthew C. Inscore
Katherine R. Gonzales
Christopher P. Rennix
Bruce H. Jones
author_sort Matthew C. Inscore
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Acute injuries are a burden on the Military Health System and degrade service members’ ability to train and deploy. Long-term injuries contribute to early attrition and increase disability costs. To properly quantify acute injuries and evaluate injury prevention programs, injuries must be accurately coded and documented. This analysis describes how the transition from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10-CM) impacted acute injury surveillance among active duty (AD) service members. Twelve months of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM coded ambulatory injury encounter records for Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps AD service members were analyzed to evaluate the effect of ICD-10-CM implementation on acute injury coding. Acute injuries coded with ICD-9-CM and categorized with the Barell matrix were compared to ICD-10-CM coded injuries classified by the proposed Injury Diagnosis Matrix (IDM). Both matrices categorize injuries by the nature of injury and into three levels of specificity for body region, although column and row headings are not identical. Results Acute injury distribution between the two matrices was generally similar in the broader body region categories but diverged substantially at the most granular cell level. The proportion of Level 1 Spine and back Body Region diagnoses was higher in the Barell than in the IDM (6.8% and 2.3%, respectively). Unspecified Level 3 Lower extremity injuries were markedly lower in the IDM compared to the Barell (0.1% and 12.1%, respectively). Conclusions This is the first large scale analysis evaluating the impacts of ICD-10-CM implementation on acute injury surveillance using ambulatory encounter data. Some injury diagnoses appeared to have shifted to a different chapter of the codebook. Also, it’s likely that the more detailed diagnostic descriptions and episode of care codes in ICD-10-CM discouraged re-coding of initial acute injury diagnoses. The proposed IDM did not result in a major disruption of acute injury surveillance. However, many acute injury diagnosis codes cannot be aligned between ICD versions. Overall, the increased specificity of ICD-10-CM and use of the IDM may lead to more precise acute injury surveillance and tailored prevention programs, which may result in less chronic injury, reduced morbidity, and lower health-care costs.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T03:22:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb556f61bf1d4173a25c8579b9b4ecb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1714
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T03:22:37Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Injury Epidemiology
spelling doaj.art-cb556f61bf1d4173a25c8579b9b4ecb52022-12-21T19:17:40ZengBMCInjury Epidemiology2197-17142018-08-01511910.1186/s40621-018-0162-yThe effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service membersMatthew C. Inscore0Katherine R. Gonzales1Christopher P. Rennix2Bruce H. Jones3Army Public Health CenterNavy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Naval Medical Center PortsmouthNavy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, Naval Medical Center PortsmouthArmy Public Health CenterAbstract Background Acute injuries are a burden on the Military Health System and degrade service members’ ability to train and deploy. Long-term injuries contribute to early attrition and increase disability costs. To properly quantify acute injuries and evaluate injury prevention programs, injuries must be accurately coded and documented. This analysis describes how the transition from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10-CM) impacted acute injury surveillance among active duty (AD) service members. Twelve months of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM coded ambulatory injury encounter records for Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps AD service members were analyzed to evaluate the effect of ICD-10-CM implementation on acute injury coding. Acute injuries coded with ICD-9-CM and categorized with the Barell matrix were compared to ICD-10-CM coded injuries classified by the proposed Injury Diagnosis Matrix (IDM). Both matrices categorize injuries by the nature of injury and into three levels of specificity for body region, although column and row headings are not identical. Results Acute injury distribution between the two matrices was generally similar in the broader body region categories but diverged substantially at the most granular cell level. The proportion of Level 1 Spine and back Body Region diagnoses was higher in the Barell than in the IDM (6.8% and 2.3%, respectively). Unspecified Level 3 Lower extremity injuries were markedly lower in the IDM compared to the Barell (0.1% and 12.1%, respectively). Conclusions This is the first large scale analysis evaluating the impacts of ICD-10-CM implementation on acute injury surveillance using ambulatory encounter data. Some injury diagnoses appeared to have shifted to a different chapter of the codebook. Also, it’s likely that the more detailed diagnostic descriptions and episode of care codes in ICD-10-CM discouraged re-coding of initial acute injury diagnoses. The proposed IDM did not result in a major disruption of acute injury surveillance. However, many acute injury diagnosis codes cannot be aligned between ICD versions. Overall, the increased specificity of ICD-10-CM and use of the IDM may lead to more precise acute injury surveillance and tailored prevention programs, which may result in less chronic injury, reduced morbidity, and lower health-care costs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-018-0162-yBarell matrixInjury diagnosis matrixICD-9-CMICD-10-CMImplementationSurveillance
spellingShingle Matthew C. Inscore
Katherine R. Gonzales
Christopher P. Rennix
Bruce H. Jones
The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
Injury Epidemiology
Barell matrix
Injury diagnosis matrix
ICD-9-CM
ICD-10-CM
Implementation
Surveillance
title The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
title_full The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
title_fullStr The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
title_full_unstemmed The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
title_short The effect of transitioning to ICD-10-CM on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
title_sort effect of transitioning to icd 10 cm on acute injury surveillance of active duty service members
topic Barell matrix
Injury diagnosis matrix
ICD-9-CM
ICD-10-CM
Implementation
Surveillance
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-018-0162-y
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewcinscore theeffectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT katherinergonzales theeffectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT christopherprennix theeffectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT brucehjones theeffectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT matthewcinscore effectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT katherinergonzales effectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT christopherprennix effectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers
AT brucehjones effectoftransitioningtoicd10cmonacuteinjurysurveillanceofactivedutyservicemembers