An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens

ABSTRACT: Mitigating the negative effects of heat stress (HS) is a critical challenge for the global poultry industry. This study evaluated the thermoregulatory potential of 3 in ovo delivered bioactive substances using selected gut health parameters. Eggs were incubated and allotted to 5 groups, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samson Oladokun, Sami Dridi, Deborah Adewole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-05-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123001268
_version_ 1797837193052422144
author Samson Oladokun
Sami Dridi
Deborah Adewole
author_facet Samson Oladokun
Sami Dridi
Deborah Adewole
author_sort Samson Oladokun
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Mitigating the negative effects of heat stress (HS) is a critical challenge for the global poultry industry. This study evaluated the thermoregulatory potential of 3 in ovo delivered bioactive substances using selected gut health parameters. Eggs were incubated and allotted to 5 groups, and respective bioactive substances delivered. These groups included—the noninjected, in ovo saline, in ovo folic acid (FA), in ovo probiotics (P), and in ovo essential oil (EO). At hatch, chicks were assigned to 5 new posthatch treatment combinations, including A) Negative control (NC)—noninjected eggs offered a basal corn-wheat-soybean diet, B) Antibiotics—NC + 0.05% bacitracin methylene disalicylate, C) In ovo FA—eggs injected with FA + NC diet, D) In ovo probiotics—eggs injected with probiotics + NC diet, E) In ovo + in-water EO—eggs injected with EO and supplied EO via drinking water + NC diet. Birds were raised for 28 d in 8 replicate cages/treatment (6 birds/cage) and exposed to either a thermoneutral (24°C ± 0.2) or HS challenge (31°C) condition from d 21 to d 28. The in ovo delivered FA and EO treatments reduced (P < 0.001) hatchability by at least 26% compared to NC. Induced HS reduced (P < 0.001) total plasma protein, total antioxidant capacity, and villus width in the duodenum and jejunum. Independent of HS and compared to NC, the in ovo + in-water EO treatment resulted in (P < 0.05) at least a 15% increase in villus height: crypt depth across the 3 gut sections. The in ovo + in-water EO treatment also increased the relative mRNA expression of intestinal barrier-related genes (Claudin1,3,4, Occludin, Zona occludens-2, and Mucin 2). Under HS, the in ovo + in-water EO treatment recorded a 3.5-fold upregulation of amino acid transporter gene (SLC1A1), compared to NC. Subject to further hatchability optimization, the in ovo + in-water delivery of EO show potential to afford broiler chicken thermotolerance.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:21:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb6328184a9e4a019a3fb6d6140dfaac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0032-5791
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:21:25Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj.art-cb6328184a9e4a019a3fb6d6140dfaac2023-04-29T14:45:39ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912023-05-011025102602An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickensSamson Oladokun0Sami Dridi1Deborah Adewole2Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada; Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USADepartment of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada; Corresponding author:ABSTRACT: Mitigating the negative effects of heat stress (HS) is a critical challenge for the global poultry industry. This study evaluated the thermoregulatory potential of 3 in ovo delivered bioactive substances using selected gut health parameters. Eggs were incubated and allotted to 5 groups, and respective bioactive substances delivered. These groups included—the noninjected, in ovo saline, in ovo folic acid (FA), in ovo probiotics (P), and in ovo essential oil (EO). At hatch, chicks were assigned to 5 new posthatch treatment combinations, including A) Negative control (NC)—noninjected eggs offered a basal corn-wheat-soybean diet, B) Antibiotics—NC + 0.05% bacitracin methylene disalicylate, C) In ovo FA—eggs injected with FA + NC diet, D) In ovo probiotics—eggs injected with probiotics + NC diet, E) In ovo + in-water EO—eggs injected with EO and supplied EO via drinking water + NC diet. Birds were raised for 28 d in 8 replicate cages/treatment (6 birds/cage) and exposed to either a thermoneutral (24°C ± 0.2) or HS challenge (31°C) condition from d 21 to d 28. The in ovo delivered FA and EO treatments reduced (P < 0.001) hatchability by at least 26% compared to NC. Induced HS reduced (P < 0.001) total plasma protein, total antioxidant capacity, and villus width in the duodenum and jejunum. Independent of HS and compared to NC, the in ovo + in-water EO treatment resulted in (P < 0.05) at least a 15% increase in villus height: crypt depth across the 3 gut sections. The in ovo + in-water EO treatment also increased the relative mRNA expression of intestinal barrier-related genes (Claudin1,3,4, Occludin, Zona occludens-2, and Mucin 2). Under HS, the in ovo + in-water EO treatment recorded a 3.5-fold upregulation of amino acid transporter gene (SLC1A1), compared to NC. Subject to further hatchability optimization, the in ovo + in-water delivery of EO show potential to afford broiler chicken thermotolerance.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123001268in ovoprobioticsessential oilantibioticsheat stress
spellingShingle Samson Oladokun
Sami Dridi
Deborah Adewole
An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens
Poultry Science
in ovo
probiotics
essential oil
antibiotics
heat stress
title An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens
title_full An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens
title_fullStr An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens
title_short An evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances (probiotic, folic acid, and essential oil) in broiler chickens
title_sort evaluation of the thermoregulatory potential of in ovo delivered bioactive substances probiotic folic acid and essential oil in broiler chickens
topic in ovo
probiotics
essential oil
antibiotics
heat stress
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123001268
work_keys_str_mv AT samsonoladokun anevaluationofthethermoregulatorypotentialofinovodeliveredbioactivesubstancesprobioticfolicacidandessentialoilinbroilerchickens
AT samidridi anevaluationofthethermoregulatorypotentialofinovodeliveredbioactivesubstancesprobioticfolicacidandessentialoilinbroilerchickens
AT deborahadewole anevaluationofthethermoregulatorypotentialofinovodeliveredbioactivesubstancesprobioticfolicacidandessentialoilinbroilerchickens
AT samsonoladokun evaluationofthethermoregulatorypotentialofinovodeliveredbioactivesubstancesprobioticfolicacidandessentialoilinbroilerchickens
AT samidridi evaluationofthethermoregulatorypotentialofinovodeliveredbioactivesubstancesprobioticfolicacidandessentialoilinbroilerchickens
AT deborahadewole evaluationofthethermoregulatorypotentialofinovodeliveredbioactivesubstancesprobioticfolicacidandessentialoilinbroilerchickens