Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations

During the winters of 2009/2010 and 2020/2021, observations were carried out at an eastern port of Liaodong Bay to examine the variations in sea ice thickness and atmospheric conditions. The daily ice thickness (DIT) and the cumulative ice thickness (CIT) are the two main observation items related t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuxian Ma, Dewen Ding, Ning Xu, Shuai Yuan, Wenqi Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/5/943
_version_ 1797614239997755392
author Yuxian Ma
Dewen Ding
Ning Xu
Shuai Yuan
Wenqi Shi
author_facet Yuxian Ma
Dewen Ding
Ning Xu
Shuai Yuan
Wenqi Shi
author_sort Yuxian Ma
collection DOAJ
description During the winters of 2009/2010 and 2020/2021, observations were carried out at an eastern port of Liaodong Bay to examine the variations in sea ice thickness and atmospheric conditions. The daily ice thickness (DIT) and the cumulative ice thickness (CIT) are the two main observation items related to the thickness of sea ice. For DIT, the sea ice thickness gradually decreases as the temperature increases, and the freezing rate <i>a</i> is 1.48 cm/(°C·d)<sup>1/2</sup>. For CIT, when the temperature is −12 °C, the maximum growth rate of ice thickness decreases from 3.5 cm/d to 1.5 cm/d as the ice thickness increases from 0 to 20 cm. The residual method was applied to calculate the oceanic heat flux, which is an important parameter of ice modeling, and both the analytic model (Stefan’s law) and numerical model (high-resolution thermodynamic snow-and-ice model) were utilized in this work. It was found that the accuracy of the simulation results was high when the growth coefficient of the analytic mode was 2.3 cm/(°C·d)<sup>1/2</sup>. With an oceanic heat flux of 2 W·m<sup>−2</sup>, the maximum error of the numerical model approached 60% in 2010 and 3.7% in 2021. However, using the oceanic heat flux calculated in this work, the maximum error can be significantly reduced to 4.2% in the winter of 2009/2010 and 1.5% in 2020/2021. Additionally, the oceanic heat flux in Liaodong Bay showed a decreasing trend with the increase in ice thickness and air temperature.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:06:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb6af03c043a4338a324d45f9d98dc82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:06:56Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-cb6af03c043a4338a324d45f9d98dc822023-11-17T08:55:13ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412023-03-0115594310.3390/w15050943Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and ObservationsYuxian Ma0Dewen Ding1Ning Xu2Shuai Yuan3Wenqi Shi4College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, ChinaCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, ChinaNational Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian 116023, ChinaNational Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian 116023, ChinaNational Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian 116023, ChinaDuring the winters of 2009/2010 and 2020/2021, observations were carried out at an eastern port of Liaodong Bay to examine the variations in sea ice thickness and atmospheric conditions. The daily ice thickness (DIT) and the cumulative ice thickness (CIT) are the two main observation items related to the thickness of sea ice. For DIT, the sea ice thickness gradually decreases as the temperature increases, and the freezing rate <i>a</i> is 1.48 cm/(°C·d)<sup>1/2</sup>. For CIT, when the temperature is −12 °C, the maximum growth rate of ice thickness decreases from 3.5 cm/d to 1.5 cm/d as the ice thickness increases from 0 to 20 cm. The residual method was applied to calculate the oceanic heat flux, which is an important parameter of ice modeling, and both the analytic model (Stefan’s law) and numerical model (high-resolution thermodynamic snow-and-ice model) were utilized in this work. It was found that the accuracy of the simulation results was high when the growth coefficient of the analytic mode was 2.3 cm/(°C·d)<sup>1/2</sup>. With an oceanic heat flux of 2 W·m<sup>−2</sup>, the maximum error of the numerical model approached 60% in 2010 and 3.7% in 2021. However, using the oceanic heat flux calculated in this work, the maximum error can be significantly reduced to 4.2% in the winter of 2009/2010 and 1.5% in 2020/2021. Additionally, the oceanic heat flux in Liaodong Bay showed a decreasing trend with the increase in ice thickness and air temperature.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/5/943Liaodong Baysea ice thicknessStefan’s lawHIGHTSIoceanic heat flux
spellingShingle Yuxian Ma
Dewen Ding
Ning Xu
Shuai Yuan
Wenqi Shi
Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations
Water
Liaodong Bay
sea ice thickness
Stefan’s law
HIGHTSI
oceanic heat flux
title Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations
title_full Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations
title_fullStr Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations
title_full_unstemmed Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations
title_short Ice Mass Balance in Liaodong Bay: Modeling and Observations
title_sort ice mass balance in liaodong bay modeling and observations
topic Liaodong Bay
sea ice thickness
Stefan’s law
HIGHTSI
oceanic heat flux
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/5/943
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxianma icemassbalanceinliaodongbaymodelingandobservations
AT dewending icemassbalanceinliaodongbaymodelingandobservations
AT ningxu icemassbalanceinliaodongbaymodelingandobservations
AT shuaiyuan icemassbalanceinliaodongbaymodelingandobservations
AT wenqishi icemassbalanceinliaodongbaymodelingandobservations