Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Introduction: Calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) with calcium chloride (CaCl2) accelerator sets faster than the cement without accelerator. For endodontic microsurgery, CSC with the accelerator tends to be less soluble in tissue fluid that may improve clinical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuttida Tungsuksomboon, Supachai Sutimuntanakul, Danuchit Banomyong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Saudi Endodontic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=31;epage=37;aulast=Tungsuksomboon
_version_ 1798022138734575616
author Nuttida Tungsuksomboon
Supachai Sutimuntanakul
Danuchit Banomyong
author_facet Nuttida Tungsuksomboon
Supachai Sutimuntanakul
Danuchit Banomyong
author_sort Nuttida Tungsuksomboon
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) with calcium chloride (CaCl2) accelerator sets faster than the cement without accelerator. For endodontic microsurgery, CSC with the accelerator tends to be less soluble in tissue fluid that may improve clinical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of endodontic microsurgery by retrofilling with CSC containing accelerator (Bio-MA) compared to the original CSC (ProRoot® mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA]). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight teeth required surgical root canal retreatment was included according to the eligible criteria. Endodontic microsurgery with standardized protocol was performed under the dental operating microscope. Bio-MA or ProRoot® MTA was randomly selected for retrofilling. At recall visit, treatment outcomes were evaluated as “healed,” “healing” or “diseased,” based on clinical and radiographic assessments. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used in the statistical analysis of the outcome. Results: Seven teeth were excluded because of vertical root fracture detected in surgery (n = 5) and inadequate retrofilling depth (n = 2). Two cases were lost to follow-up. For thirty-nine teeth with 14.9 ± 5.2 months recall, “healed” rates were 85% in Bio-MA and 84.2% in ProRoot® MTA, and “healing” rates was 15% in Bio-MA and 15.8% in ProRoot® MTA. None of “disease” was observed. No significant difference in the clinical outcome was observed between groups of Bio-MA and ProRoot® MTA (P = 1.00). Conclusions: The endodontic microsurgery outcome of Bio-MA containing CaCl2 accelerator was similar to that of ProRoot® MTA without accelerator.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:24:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cb7097654fbd472aa7e4488d12ba634c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2320-1495
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:24:56Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Endodontic Journal
spelling doaj.art-cb7097654fbd472aa7e4488d12ba634c2022-12-22T04:12:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Endodontic Journal2320-14952022-01-01121313710.4103/sej.sej_152_21Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trialNuttida TungsuksomboonSupachai SutimuntanakulDanuchit BanomyongIntroduction: Calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) with calcium chloride (CaCl2) accelerator sets faster than the cement without accelerator. For endodontic microsurgery, CSC with the accelerator tends to be less soluble in tissue fluid that may improve clinical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of endodontic microsurgery by retrofilling with CSC containing accelerator (Bio-MA) compared to the original CSC (ProRoot® mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA]). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight teeth required surgical root canal retreatment was included according to the eligible criteria. Endodontic microsurgery with standardized protocol was performed under the dental operating microscope. Bio-MA or ProRoot® MTA was randomly selected for retrofilling. At recall visit, treatment outcomes were evaluated as “healed,” “healing” or “diseased,” based on clinical and radiographic assessments. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used in the statistical analysis of the outcome. Results: Seven teeth were excluded because of vertical root fracture detected in surgery (n = 5) and inadequate retrofilling depth (n = 2). Two cases were lost to follow-up. For thirty-nine teeth with 14.9 ± 5.2 months recall, “healed” rates were 85% in Bio-MA and 84.2% in ProRoot® MTA, and “healing” rates was 15% in Bio-MA and 15.8% in ProRoot® MTA. None of “disease” was observed. No significant difference in the clinical outcome was observed between groups of Bio-MA and ProRoot® MTA (P = 1.00). Conclusions: The endodontic microsurgery outcome of Bio-MA containing CaCl2 accelerator was similar to that of ProRoot® MTA without accelerator.http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=31;epage=37;aulast=Tungsuksombooncalcium silicate cementendodontic surgeryrandomized controlled trialretrofillingtreatment outcome
spellingShingle Nuttida Tungsuksomboon
Supachai Sutimuntanakul
Danuchit Banomyong
Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Saudi Endodontic Journal
calcium silicate cement
endodontic surgery
randomized controlled trial
retrofilling
treatment outcome
title Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort outcomes of endodontic microsurgery with retrofilling of calcium silicate cements with or without calcium chloride accelerator a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic calcium silicate cement
endodontic surgery
randomized controlled trial
retrofilling
treatment outcome
url http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=31;epage=37;aulast=Tungsuksomboon
work_keys_str_mv AT nuttidatungsuksomboon outcomesofendodonticmicrosurgerywithretrofillingofcalciumsilicatecementswithorwithoutcalciumchlorideacceleratorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT supachaisutimuntanakul outcomesofendodonticmicrosurgerywithretrofillingofcalciumsilicatecementswithorwithoutcalciumchlorideacceleratorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT danuchitbanomyong outcomesofendodonticmicrosurgerywithretrofillingofcalciumsilicatecementswithorwithoutcalciumchlorideacceleratorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial